Last time i checked, USN was getting "harassed" by iranians in gulf or protesting unprofessional entanglement by Chinese & Russians
Hi ansy1968, I actually had a hidden point to my silly story!Hi horse,
hahaha I admired your confidence , well IF the purpose of your loan is to help, then you had done a good thing. If not then you had a valid reason to never loan him again. It's how you value your friendship, I hope my advise may suffice, you know the Asian way, charge it to experience....
Hi TD739,US economic sanction is no joke. Countries won't able to access dollar institutions. Why they risk that by buying China tech goods?
Even China solved the semiconductor issue it still will be boxed in by US.Hi TD739,
Yup, it's like a Damocles sword hanging over your head, which country would want to be under that situation. Guess what only China had the ability to undo that. The US should thread carefully, if push come to shove and China produce an alternative, it will be an avalanche with the US being the victim.
Italy, India join belt road only to get cheap loan from China, and now they showed their true colors. A lot of countries in Belt and Road will do like them, just see in 1-2 years ahead
Yinhe Incident was 1993; China was an insect compared to today. While nuclear power doesn't mean that there will be a nuclear strike in retaliation to a ship check, it does mean that future ships can be escorted and incidents can quickly escalate into military confrontation with a nuclear power.US had intercepted China ship before like milkyway to Iran. China minimal nuke stance doesn't mean much. It's only retaliatory strike on home land. Even India willing to challenge China at border. At highsea forget it. Its nuke power status is not much.
Other countries are scared being intercepted by US Navy at highsea.
Almost all countries scared by US sanction. Just look at foreigb companies stop supplying Huawei.
Can't take the easy way out. Countries won't just accept China eventually. It's an order being imposed upon.
You don't change geopolitically not much will changed. And it doesn't have to be WWIII.
Even China solved the semiconductor issue it still will be boxed in by US.
In order to trigger the avalanche it will need to change things geopolitically. Highsea controlled by US therefore land route to west has to be established.
The current belt and road is too shaky.
Personally I feel it needs to dismember India.
Forming military alliance with russia and collectively force many countries into their sphere of influence. Allies are formed by hard military power. Only after that I can see Chinese tech can spread to those countries.
The day China can compete against US militarily across the globe that's the time Chinese tech can spread.
Even China solved the semiconductor issue it still will be boxed in by US.
In order to trigger the avalanche it will need to change things geopolitically. Highsea controlled by US therefore land route to west has to be established.
The current belt and road is too shaky.
Personally I feel it needs to dismember India.
Forming military alliance with russia and collectively force many countries into their sphere of influence. Allies are formed by hard military power. Only after that I can see Chinese tech can spread to those countries.
The day China can compete against US militarily across the globe that's the time Chinese tech can spread.
To be honest, western consumer markets have been decimated since 2008. This is mainly why China's growth rates pre-2008 are less than their growth rates post-2008; can't rely on export-oriented growth if your main export markets in the West have collapsed.
Is this article an example of ...
A) fake news
A) butt hurts
B) sour grapes
C) all of the above
I need feedback before I read the article. Thanks.