What are you talking about?
What am i talking about?
Do you have any sources saying that Jainism is older than Hinduism?
Yes. I have talked to a lot of them, argued with them in different platform.
No, Do your own job and find yourself out. Don't ask other to do your work.
Both Jainism and Buddhism are originated from Hinduism.
What?!!
Hinduism can't even figure out what it is. In southern part of india people
don't even recognize veda to be a religious book. Hindus are still poking around indus valley script.
The problem with hindus are, as soon as some big mouth stone is found they will claim it is hindu symbol. There were/are lot of folk religions that have those rituals that includes worshiping statues, earth elements, far far older than even sub continent religion. Gobe tepe found in turkey is 12k years old. Hinduism simply stole & copied it from them.
Hinduism is mishmash of jainism & other folk religion. In fact the concept of worshiping fire is from local zoroas in Iran.
Remember that time when you hindus were about to launch yourself to space when you found something you thought to be lost city of that bluish looking pide piper? Eventually only to fall on earth upside down.
Buddhism originated from Hinduism?
Gautam Buddha exclusively rejected anything that was of Hinduism.
Only religion that has some form of root in Hinduism is Sikhism. Modern form of hindusm was invented by Vivekananda
Chandragupta Maurya was a Hindu when he ruled South Asia. What he practiced after abdicating the throne is irrelevant to this discussion.
No. Chandragupta Maurya never followed hinduism. If you follow the logic that his conversion doesn't matter after abdicating throne, then you have to show he ever followed Hinduism. He born as one doesn't make the cut. Chandragupta was never a hindu. Hindus are desperate to wash away their all time losing streak super natural azz whopping by every major power who did set foot in that direction. A person's faith is what he chooses it to be. What he was due to birth is irrelevant to this discussion.
And Brahmagupta and Arybhata were Indian Hindus living in an Empire run by Indian Hindus. What does that have to do with your Silicon Valley example?
That your mathematician discovered zero.
And they will always be zero until they start working there.
Aren't you so proud to tell others how many Indians working there instead in your own country?
What did you not understand there?
There is no such thing as Indian hindus,as clearly stated by Dr. Ambedkar.
Hindus opposed independent india & eagerly served as servant of their British masters as part of British Raj. Even throughout Bengal their history as agent of British is well known.
As long as that part of history isn't set straight, India will continue to be what it is.
We will settle the score, but first, let's see how you do serve your British rebranded as american masters this time.
But rest assured, we will not allow 51st state of The United States here among us.
Btw, you aren't trying to get me banned with your circus, are you? Concentrate on this
India’s chief economic advisor Krishnamurthy Subramanian hit back at the International Monetary Fund for downgrading the country’s growth projection, saying it’s “significantly off the mark.”
Ain't this cute?
