Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

silentlurker

Junior Member
Registered Member
As I understand it the difference of the MK1A and MK1 is primarily in the internal systems, so the current production line can be leveraged with minimal changes, so long as all the testing have been done and verified.

The number of fighters needed isn’t dependent on what the rest of the world has but what the requirements of the IAF says and according to them even with the additional 83 there is still the shortfall of an additional 114, furthermore, there will be other older aircraft slated for decommissioning and will require replacements in the coming 5-10 years on top of the MIG 21s and MIG 27s that the order is meant to replace...

Finally MWF is still on the drawing board... with the expected first flight of 2023... after that who knows when production will actually begin, there is also the consideration of the Su-30MK1’s production coming to an end, while the Tejas is not the same class/role of aircraft, the situation that India is in right now, any additional combat aircraft is a plus... MWF represent much greater changes... there are also not-so-minor airframe changes in addition to internal system changes... with the track record of the Tejas program so far we might not see the MWF anytime soon after the first flight and thus the plugging will still need to be done anyway... at the very least the MK1A is currently considered an acceptable aircraft...
I'd say that the MWF and Tejas are different enough to be put in seperate plane classes and roles. Look at the planned empty weights of both, MK1 6500 kg, MWF 7800kg.

MWF is also aiming to be significantly faster and longer range VS MK1 which is basically a point-defense fighter.
 

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'd say that the MWF and Tejas are different enough to be put in seperate plane classes and roles. Look at the planned empty weights of both, MK1 6500 kg, MWF 7800kg.

MWF is also aiming to be significantly faster and longer range VS MK1 which is basically a point-defense fighter.
Even with the additional weight it’s not significant enough, so it should still remain with a similar, if not the same role and class but if the MWF is as advertised then there will be more variety of missions the MWF can take on... but since it’s still on the drawing board it’s difficult to say for sure...
 

silentlurker

Junior Member
Registered Member
Even with the additional weight it’s not significant enough, so it should still remain with a similar, if not the same role and class but if the MWF is as advertised then there will be more variety of missions the MWF can take on... but since it’s still on the drawing board it’s difficult to say for sure...
Yeah I am looking at the predicted stats, but when you consider its range is supposedly 1500km instead of 500km I would consider that enough of a difference that the plane is doctrinally used in different ways, hence different class. We'll see in 2023 I guess
 

silentlurker

Junior Member
Registered Member
Just the Tejas itself is pretty simple, Mk1 -> mk1A -> Mk2(medium weight fighter MWF).

But then you bring in all the naval variants and then the twin-engine ones then the two-seater trainers and it does get real confusing, not to even mention the cancelled/delayed variants...
 
Top