Talk about twisting someone's words to suit it's own narratives. This is just mind gymnastics at work again.
Either he doesn't know the difference between the police and judges. Or he's deliberately distorting the facts.
The police is a public employee like no other. It's there to uphold the law. So if the lawmakers decided that it is an offence to burn the national flag. Then the police will need to stop that offence and arrest everyone involved in committing that offence.
The judges, on the other hand, interpret the law. And since the judicial system is subservient to the British law. And all judges have to be a barrister first that swore allegiances to the crown. The two can not be reconciĺled.
It is true that the chef executive select the judges. But he/she can only select the ones from a pool of practicing barristers who had already swore their allegiances to the crown.
Could you imagine if the chief executive appoint judges from China, not only is this unworkable and impractical. The likes of you know who would have a field day claiming further "errosion" of Hong Kong's freedom. Blah blah blah.
So it is just another crazy fantasy world our member is living in in his head to try to put the blame on the selection of judges on the chief executive. Instead on the system that was rigged in favour of the British from day one.
Either he doesn't know the difference between the police and judges. Or he's deliberately distorting the facts.
The police is a public employee like no other. It's there to uphold the law. So if the lawmakers decided that it is an offence to burn the national flag. Then the police will need to stop that offence and arrest everyone involved in committing that offence.
The judges, on the other hand, interpret the law. And since the judicial system is subservient to the British law. And all judges have to be a barrister first that swore allegiances to the crown. The two can not be reconciĺled.
It is true that the chef executive select the judges. But he/she can only select the ones from a pool of practicing barristers who had already swore their allegiances to the crown.
Could you imagine if the chief executive appoint judges from China, not only is this unworkable and impractical. The likes of you know who would have a field day claiming further "errosion" of Hong Kong's freedom. Blah blah blah.
So it is just another crazy fantasy world our member is living in in his head to try to put the blame on the selection of judges on the chief executive. Instead on the system that was rigged in favour of the British from day one.
Last edited: