Mr T
Senior Member
Why should the airline industry have been given special treatment? Its employees were given the same access to Covid-19 support that other industries were. British Airways weren't the only company that lost money.
Virgin didn't get a government bailout either.
So here's the key point, how would things have been better if the Conservatives passed a law making them the only legal party in the UK, with a few "loyal" other parties being allowed to participate in elections in a token fashion? Presumably having Boris Johnson as Prime Minister For Life wouldn't have made you any happier with your lot, would it? Democracy isn't the path to a great government, it's a method of holding it accountable.
I'm sorry to break it to you, but the media in democratic countries frequently focuses on the negative rather than the positive. That's often the same for their home government. Even the Chinese media tends to only report positive stuff about other countries if they're a close ally of China or it's related to them doing something involving a deal with China. Otherwise it's pretty negative or filler.
Until recently when I asked people very conerned with human rights why they tended to focus on the US and had no problems buying Chinese-made items, the most common comment I heard was that China shouldn't be held to the same high standard as countries like the US.
Also, there certainly used to be a lot of praise for China's accomplishments under Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao. If there has been a rise of criticism since then it's because of Xi's ham-fisted approach to diplomatic relations and domestic crackdown (Hong Kong especially).
I'm not sure that Xi has accomplished anything other than using his power to suppress his opponents, use resources that were generated under previous governments and tell diplomats to start getting angry. That's more akin to what Donald Trump did after inheriting his father's money.
His engagement policy with Taiwan has been a failure - he's overseen Taiwan electing a DPP President twice and with a legislative majority (something they never had).
He's also managed to annoy countries that were previously fairly well disposed towards him thanks to trying to cover up the Covid-19 situation until it had spread internationally.
Xi isn't the emodiment of every CCP politician that has gone before him. He shouldn't be given any praise for the leadership of his predecessors.
IT professionals, medical staff, vetenarians - they were pretty ordinary and didn't have anything to hide (I saw how they lived).
Your doctor friends want to work in a state-run hospital in mainland China where doctors get paid peanuts? Your lawyer friends want to work in a country where cases can be decided on the basis of which plaintiff is most connected to local/central government? No idea about the investment bankers, but they'll be making money wherever their companies have offices, so I can see if they wanted to move back home.
Unless you live a country like China or Russia where the state can take your money away and throw you in jail, because you said something bad about its leader.
The Affordable Care Act remains generally popular in the US, and the largest majority is for the poorest Americans (select income under $40,000).
That's drivel. Trump has lost cases just recently when ordinary citizens got injunctions against his bans against Wechat and Tiktok. They might not win their cases eventually, but it goes to show that the US state doesn't always win. If it was just about money then the US government would have pre-booked "the best" lawyers and then automatically won.
Last edited:
