I think it was in my post about the Tomahawk Weapon System, but I remember outlining regions in which US CSGs are likely to operate due to permissive bathymetry, sufficient standoff from the mainland, sufficient proximity to Taiwan, and topographic "depth" provided by landmasses. CSG5 is right about on the inner (meaning closer to the mainland) edge of that zone, and the ARGs are just west of that edge.
I'm not saying that war is going to break out, but I again want to remind folks here that this is what force protection and preparation for a potential onset of hostilities looks like.
Sorry for interupting your recovery, but I have two quick questions for you.
1. What do the intelligence community surrounding DC and the Pentagon think of the situation in the Western Pacific thus far, with Pelosi's visit to Taiwan being confirmed? Related to this, are they generally viewing China's expected response as the same as what Kirby said, i.e. China would only be merely bluffing; or that they are expecting China to respond for real this time, (primarily) militarily or otherwise?
2. Say, if China proceed to attack and invade Taiwan militarily in response to Pelosi's visit, would the US and her allies directly intervene (as in sending troops and ships to fight China directly), or just providing assistance from the sidelines, like what they are doing with Ukraine right now? Assuming that Pelosi is able to leave Taiwan safely, whether ot not she can meet English Vegetable.