The PLAN LCAC Type 726 Yuyi Class
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
WTH are you even talking about with your perspective nonsense? I am talking about the width of the ramp, the presence of the air vents, and the presence of the tracks on the decks, all indicating the intent of the designers to load this ACV in single-column fashion only.
NO, genius. The axial line is the midline of the deck to guide the vehicles down the middle of the deck. the perpendicular line marks the center of weight of the 726. For example if a tank is to be parked, it will be parked directly over where the two lines cross.
I'm not here to convince you. My motivation is merely to point out your absurdity for the benefit of others. Speaking of brick wall, you are the ultimate example of Brick Wall. You are Brick Wall Incarnate.
Yes, the 726 is about 15% longer than the LCAC, but not nearly as much as the 29% longer that you are laughably claiming with your ludicrous CGI that you love to pull out as "proof" of your claims. In truth if the 726 were even 1m longer than the LCAC you would be vomiting paroxysms of pomposity claiming some kind of victory.
Hendrik and a few of his buddies here are Pure Fanboi, always so easily butthurt if a piece of Chinese technology or hardware is not glowingly presented or reviewed. It's like somehow their personal sense of self-worth is intimately tied together with the Chinese military.
Last edited:
Hendrik_2000
Lieutenant General
SHow me where do I post a fake photo don't just blurt comment from you rear
NO KNOWN PHOTO OF TYPE 71 WITH 4 LCAC GENIUS
Last edited:
Hendrik_2000
Lieutenant General
NO NEED FOR LONG WINDING WORD PROOF IT TO ME "THAT YUYI CAN ONLY HOLD 1/3 VOLUME OF LCAC"
IF IT 20% LONGER AND 10 % WIDER HOW CAN IT BE 30% OF VOLUME? ANSWER ME!
USE YOUR BRAIN AND NOT YOUR MOUTH! YOU DON'T EVEN PASS ELEMENTARY MATH!
YOU ARE THE ONE THAT HAS DISEASE OF SUPERIORITY COMPLEX
asif iqbal
Lieutenant General
You are a troll
Go to pages 175-180 of Type 071 thread and look at the 4 traffic lights inside the well deck
Each LCAC parks infront of those traffics
4 lights = 4 LCAC
Go to pages 175-180 of Type 071 thread and look at the 4 traffic lights inside the well deck
Each LCAC parks infront of those traffics
4 lights = 4 LCAC
Are you now screaming on the internet with your all-caps nonsense? LOL
It's simple really, one lane vs three lanes. That extra 4m of length gets you what, exactly? Not even a single HMMWV, which is 4.6m long. That extra 1.Xm of beam gets you what, exactly? Still only a single column of vehicles. The problem is that the 726 does not maximally use the space available to the greatest efficiency compared to the LCAC. The other problem is your fanboism, which prevents you from recognizing this, or if you do recognize it, prevents you from acknowledging it in public. Now let's hear you scream some more.
Hendrik_2000
Lieutenant General
word and word doesn't mean anything Lets do the calc will you following you reasoning
Let assume 50% of the surface area for LCAC is taken by the machinery and the other 50% for the load
Now you are saying that the Yuyi only carry 1/3rd load of LCAC ok now lets calculate 0.3 X 0.5= 0.15
We know that Yuyi = 1.3 X LCAC
Now using your argument the surface area taken by machinery in yuyi is 1.3 - 0.15 = 1.15
Now ratio that to 1.3 So 1.15/1.3 X 100% = 88% of the surface area is taken by the machinery(turbine, fan etc)
Now who is absurd here!
Now for any one that has clear eyesight does this look like 90% of the area taken by machinery?
Last edited:
Why would I allow ANY of your idiotic assumptions to pass, like 50% vs 50%, 1.3 X LCAC, and all the other nonsense you have tried "assume" so that your fakeass numbers can work with your fakeass CGI?
I don't want to bait anyone, nor to get into needless fight. Simply show me a genuine photo, video clip even better, that 726 is uploading and downloading heavy vehicles. That's all I deem righteous and justifiable. Before that, I'm truly fed up with assumptions.