AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
The flip side of the coin Brazil will be obligated to abide by US rules through NATO like what technology it can purchase and from who. What country is Brazil under threat that it needs NATO protection?
News on China's scientific and technological development.
- Thread starter Quickie
- Start date
The flip side of the coin Brazil will be obligated to abide by US rules through NATO like what technology it can purchase and from who. What country is Brazil under threat that it needs NATO protection?
It is probably is fake or someone misread what was said. They could have said that Brazil can become a ''junior partner'' of NATO if they drop Huawei. Like something with a meaningless label like a ''global partner''. None of those labels mean much considering close allies of China like Pakistan and Mongolia have those labels too.
Likely they meant Kilowatt. Science aware editors hard to come by for English department of GT, perhaps.
China Pakistan alliance is not one of hollow labels.
It's not the case for now atleast. Not with India getting new badges from New partners.
No, I mean Pakistan being a supposed member or a ''close ally'' of NATO with a meaningless label.
I am guessing it is 100Kwr, which stands for kw refrigeration. This is the metric unit equivalent of refrigeration ton per hour. If it is, it is not a very large capacity machine but then again we are talking about a cryogenic chiller which I don’t have experience on.
Security and military come before economic gain. If they don't join NATO, they might have to fight against NATO, and China doesn't provide any protection to its allies against US-conspired coups and following invasions on the pretext of humanitarian intervention.
The US forces and co-ops are everywhere. What most countries need first is security that they wouldn't get bombed or ousted by the US. Economy is a next matter. People often think "security with the US and economy with China but security is always more important" because if you don't have security, you don't have economy either. There is no point getting Chinese investment and then get "regime-changed" or bombed by the US. Works the same for China too. There is no point investing all the money in other countries only to be destroyed/sabotaged by the US military intervention and the new US puppet cancels all contracts with China and debts to China. That's why China's economy-driven diplomacy has limits.
Brazil is a very schizophrenic country politically due to its demographics. An elite whose wants that joins the western elites and underclass that is very left wing. So, Brazil will be one of those countries that is always moving back and forth. They will be anti China, pro China, anti US and pro US all at once. Look at all of the antics that happened over the Chinese vaccines as an example.
But that is exactly what China is trying to do.
It started with Chairman Mao. The idea is to overthrow the old order.
What is described as security and military comes before the economy, that clearly is the old order. That goes all the way back to the age of Imperialism.
China is going to defeat that by doing it different.
The catchphrase the CCP uses is what the level of development a country is at.
China is all about development, and what level of development an independent country would be at. China is willing to do business.
America is all about the old order, where someone has to be number #1 and everyone else must have their place in their heirachy.
The CCP is trying to defeat the old order by doing better.
China is still growing at 5% or more, dragging the entire region with it.
What is America doing? Not much.
Tencent censors article on China’s widening tech gap with US, written by its own researcher
Chinese tech giant censored an article by one of its own staff researchers published on Friday that discussed the country’s widening gap in the digital economy with the US and stressed the importance of the tech sector amid Beijing’s ongoing crackdown on related industries.The article, titled “Warning of the widening gap in the digital economy between China and the US”, said that domestic Big Tech companies, which saw rapid growth from 2016 to 2018, are now slowing down and falling behind those in the US in terms of both revenue and market capitalisation.
China’s tech industry is at a low point, the article said, and the country must “tightly grasp the historical opportunity of information development and digital revolution” to avoid repeating the mistake of missing out on previous industrial revolutions.