New Energy Vehicles (NEVs) in China

Tyler

Captain
Registered Member
Chinese can focus on some international markets but certain markets will still be outside reach. Like the US, EU, UK, Australia and possibly Japan. Maybe even a few others. Those markets have already hiked up tariffs on Chinese cars. I don't see that policy reversing. Only getting more active. The better the foreign cars are, the more competitive they become, the bigger tariffs there will be. It's just the way the game is played.

It's not just cars. Here's an example of E-bikes.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Just hike tariffs on foreign gasoline cars in China.
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
Australia's second best selling EV is the MG ZS. Yup, that's made in China.

Australia's top best selling EV is the Tesla Model 3---made in China.
That may be. But point is that tariffs are changed over time, due to politics. So when politics decide for whatever reason that tariffs go up by another 50 or 100%, then certain products will cease to be competitive.

And tariffs will lead to other tariffs and soon it will end in two blocs. Chinese/Other bloc and US/EU/Other bloc. And no side will have competitively priced products being sold in the other side's market. Now whether that's good or bad is completely different discussion in which i will not partake.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Nokia, Blackberry and Xerox faced new and different technology disruptors that made them obsolete. But Toyota, Honda et al are just being late in the game. They will still make and sell EVs. Their competition will be Chinese brands that are nearly as good in quality and reliability, but cheaper and probably have more features and good after-sales service.

The best way to describe corporations is that they are like steering massive cruise ships. When you see the icebergs ahead, you need to make those steering inputs early, not late, because late is often too late.

One problem with Toyota and Honda is that they do not control the supply chain, but of course, none does completely, unlike BYD, who makes its own batteries and designs its own chips (fabless chipmaker). This is where the monster analogy comes in. If you want to be a force in the field five years from now, now is the time you better start creating your supply chain.

Car wars is all about margin wars. If you are only making a profit out of a few hundred dollars a car, margin control is essential and for that to happen, you need a tight grip of your supply chain. If you make your own batteries for example, your cost would be lower than if you have to buy it from someone else.

With CATL dominating Lithium Iron Phosphate for example, and LIP batteries is becoming increasingly the cost for the low end EV for its low costs and safety, how is Toyota and Honda going to source them? I don't think Panasonic makes LIP. Look at GM, which sourced batteries from LG Chem, and what a flaming wreck the Chevy Volt has become. Fact is EV batteries is a very safety sensitive issue and requires multiple levels of testing. I have yet to see anyone claiming that ramming a nail through their battery won't make it explode unlike the BYD Blade battery, which I believe is a major game changer. I also see the Chinese battery makers, CATL and BYD especially, leading the charge for cobalt free battery already tested and ready to deploy them, when others like Panasonic and LG Chem, are still using nickel and cobalt. We're talking about an advantage that is in years.


 

broadsword

Brigadier
The best way to describe corporations is that they are like steering massive cruise ships. When you see the icebergs ahead, you need to make those steering inputs early, not late, because late is often too late.

One problem with Toyota and Honda is that they do not control the supply chain, but of course, none does completely, unlike BYD, who makes its own batteries and designs its own chips (fabless chipmaker). This is where the monster analogy comes in. If you want to be a force in the field five years from now, now is the time you better start creating your supply chain.

Car wars is all about margin wars. If you are only making a profit out of a few hundred dollars a car, margin control is essential and for that to happen, you need a tight grip of your supply chain. If you make your own batteries for example, your cost would be lower than if you have to buy it from someone else.

With CATL dominating Lithium Iron Phosphate for example, and LIP batteries is becoming increasingly the cost for the low end EV for its low costs and safety, how is Toyota and Honda going to source them? I don't think Panasonic makes LIP. Look at GM, which sourced batteries from LG Chem, and what a flaming wreck the Chevy Volt has become. Fact is EV batteries is a very safety sensitive issue and requires multiple levels of testing. I have yet to see anyone claiming that ramming a nail through their battery won't make it explode unlike the BYD Blade battery, which I believe is a major game changer. I also see the Chinese battery makers, CATL and BYD especially, leading the charge for cobalt free battery already tested and ready to deploy them, when others like Panasonic and LG Chem, are still using nickel and cobalt. We're talking about an advantage that is in years.



Toyota is developing the next generation battery which is solid-state. Honda will source from CATL like Merc, BMW and other Chinese EV makers.

It is not the source or type of batteries that will be the deciding factor. Battery fires will be sorted in this young industry. The main thing about the battery the consumer cares about is the range, safety and life-span, not the materials used. Mitsubishi and Nissan's EVs have so far been the compacts, unlike the bigger sizes of their competitors which serve a bigger market.

One heavy stress factor for the current ICE makers will be the entry of Apple. When you have Apple, you will find Xiaomi, Oppo, etc.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Toyota is developing the next generation battery which is solid-state. Honda will source from CATL like Merc, BMW and other Chinese EV makers.

It is not the source or type of batteries that will be the deciding factor. Battery fires will be sorted in this young industry. The main thing about the battery the consumer cares about is the range, safety and life-span, not the materials used. Mitsubishi and Nissan's EVs have so far been the compacts, unlike the bigger sizes of their competitors which serve a bigger market.

One heavy stress factor for the current ICE makers will be the entry of Apple. When you have Apple, you will find Xiaomi, Oppo, etc.

According to Sandy Munro, the Toyota solid state battery project is phase zero. It means its still a lab project. That means all the hurdles are still ahead of you, such as real life, abuse and safety testing.

Range, safety and life span, not to mention cost and sustainability is where CATL and BYD are hitting it out of the park. That's why even Tesla is buying BYD blade batteries. Nicket Metal Hydride, which is used on earlier and now high end EVs, uses cobalt, and we know there is sustainability issues from where these minerals are derived. Lithium Ion Phosphate is a very safe battery chemistry, albeit with lower energy density. BYD Blade alleviates energy density by clever physical packaging. CATL can turn the market around as Sodium Ion is a game changer as it doesn't use Lithium, Nicket and Cobalt. By the way, the Chevy Volt recall? They are changing the batteries over to LiP.

China is clearly leading the way to low cost EVs, which is where the disruption factor against ICEs would be located. In this context, the US$5000 Wuling car is a historical game changer. When EVs are starting to appear from the $5000 to $25000 segment, they will begin to eat the ICE market's lunch. That's why Akio Toyoda is panicing. He's smart enough to see where its going and realize that Toyota isn't agile enough to make this change in time.
 

Tyler

Captain
Registered Member
There are already significant tariffs on foreign cars in China. I believe most Toyota's and Honda's etc in China are manufactured in China with local partners, so if you ban those brands your only hurting yourself.
Just ban Japanese brands locally. The people will then buy local brands, which will make more money. The factories will still crank out Chinese brands.
 

Nutrient

Junior Member
Registered Member
That may be. But point is that tariffs are changed over time, due to politics. So when politics decide for whatever reason that tariffs go up by another 50 or 100%, then certain products will cease to be competitive.

And tariffs will lead to other tariffs and soon it will end in two blocs. Chinese/Other bloc and US/EU/Other bloc. And no side will have competitively priced products being sold in the other side's market. Now whether that's good or bad is completely different discussion in which i will not partake.

If by "blocs" you mean isolated areas, with almost no inter-area trade, then that may not happen.

In 2017,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

As for the EU, I wrote earlier about Volkswagen, by far the largest carmaker in Europe:
Trump-like tariffs and embargos would hurt Europe.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, in 2019 Volkswagen sold twice as many cars in China as in all of Europe. The company sold five times more cars in China than in Germany.

The sales are probably reckoned by number of vehicles. By revenue, we would expect the gap to narrow somewhat: Europeans probably buy more expensive vehicles. But if China's market were suddenly cut off, there's little doubt that Volkswagen would take a serious hit. And many other European companies would also suffer.

Of course, Europe's political system is almost totally enslaved to the US, so who knows what will happen. Europe's sanctions on the Russian Federation prove that they are willing to hurt themselves to please America.

But if the Euros sanctioned China, they would really hurt themselves. They know it, and there is probably a lot of resistance to American diktats. This may explain why Germany's warship, sailing down the Pacific in a show of Western solidarity, neverthethess asked to visit Shanghai.

As for Japan, in 2019
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
($141 billion); the US was a distant second ($119 billion).

And I haven't even mentioned the $trillions that Boeing and Airbus stand to lose if rigid trading blocs formed, and China stopped buying airplanes from abroad. So a world of blocs is not by any means a guaranteed thing.
 
Last edited:

OppositeDay

Senior Member
Registered Member
China should bar state-owned carmakers from making EVs in their joint-ventures with overseas carmakers. Those SOEs are basically subsiding foreigners.
 

broadsword

Brigadier
According to Sandy Munro, the Toyota solid state battery project is phase zero. It means its still a lab project. That means all the hurdles are still ahead of you, such as real life, abuse and safety testing.

Range, safety and life span, not to mention cost and sustainability is where CATL and BYD are hitting it out of the park. That's why even Tesla is buying BYD blade batteries. Nicket Metal Hydride, which is used on earlier and now high end EVs, uses cobalt, and we know there is sustainability issues from where these minerals are derived. Lithium Ion Phosphate is a very safe battery chemistry, albeit with lower energy density. BYD Blade alleviates energy density by clever physical packaging. CATL can turn the market around as Sodium Ion is a game changer as it doesn't use Lithium, Nicket and Cobalt. By the way, the Chevy Volt recall? They are changing the batteries over to LiP.

China is clearly leading the way to low cost EVs, which is where the disruption factor against ICEs would be located. In this context, the US$5000 Wuling car is a historical game changer. When EVs are starting to appear from the $5000 to $25000 segment, they will begin to eat the ICE market's lunch. That's why Akio Toyoda is panicing. He's smart enough to see where its going and realize that Toyota isn't agile enough to make this change in time.

Then Toyota will have to source from somebody else if they want to enter the EV business.
 
Top