I bet they will try to get Kazakhs in China to secede from China and join Kazakhstan. Or promote the idea of greater Kazakhstan
Kazakhs in China are seen are more Chinese than Kazakh. They don't even use the same writing (Arabic/Persian script for Chinese Kazakh, Cyrillic for Kazakhstan as imposed by the USSR), plus they don't know Russian which is important to know in Kazakhstan. Conversely knowing Mandarin means they are better off staying in China (in terms of economic opportunity).
However, in the context of US interference, definitely would try to promote this. We saw it recently saw it in Mongolia where RFA claimed "widespread protests" against the educational changes where some additional courses would be taught in Mandarin rather than Mongolian. Then you realize these protests were actually in Outer Mongolia...
Then if you know history, after the fall of the USSR, the revival of the traditional Mongolian script required teachers from China since Outer Mongolia replaced Mongol script with Cyrillic...
Cultural genociding of something you preserved, it can only be conceived of by American media/think tanks
It's mixed, there's a part of Ukraine that have better economic relation with Russia and wishes for more trade with Russia (Eastern part) and then there's the other part that have such a relation with EU (Western part), including probably lots of people that wishes to have an easier time to migrate to EU (or if not, at least an easier time to get to work in EU countries).
Can say there's a pro-west part and pro-Russia part, with the pro-west part winning in 2014 (with help and meddling from the west, and ofc, Russia did also meddle and interfere).
Well, that goes without saying that not everyone in the country necessarily supported the pro-west orientation. However, was it possible to have it both ways? Allegedly Russian sources say negotiations on the table were open to EU membership as long as NATO was off the table.
And the reason is as he said, it takes hard power dominance to build "soft power" (or as I call it, non-violent extensions of hard power) against the wishes of the current dominant "soft power." "Soft power" is the prize you win for dominating in hard power; it is the fighter's title belt, the NFL/NBA's Championship ring. You might be number 2-3 for decades, competitive every time, but you will never have that championship ring/belt until you are number one. That's why China's "soft power" seems to be its weakest domain, not because Chinese culture is not being well-represented, but because displacing hostile "soft power" with your own "soft power" is the trophy and the trophy is the last step in total victory.
No relation to anything you said, but since you mention NBA Championsips...
Michael Jordan is an amazing basketball player, terrible NBA executive, amazing businessman. Paying $300 mil for the Hornets and selling for $3b, well done.