Ladakh Flash Point


hkky

New Member
Registered Member
Why do you guys keep on responding to these trolls? Their irrational response may give you an emotional surge, but you know they will never concede no matter how logical your arguments are. Not only do you waste your time in writing responses but our time as well in scanning through these less than informative posts.
 
It's China who capitulate every time. We saw videos of drone making food delivery to Chinese claiming Indian army can't sustain in mountain.
So is the food delivery the capitulation part or the part where they killed 20 Indians and scattered 600 with 70 PLA?
After all this China decides to withdraw.
Well, you signed the agreement to be good again and China has an actual rivalry with America to tend to. What's the other option? Finish off your whole country? No matter where we leave you off at, you're gonna call it a withdrawal anyway LOL
 
Last edited:

siegecrossbow

Brigadier
Staff member
Super Moderator
@twineedle Ok OK OK, serious question, real talk: I understand how 600 armed Indians can lose in melee to 70 minutemen Chinese soldiers despite starting in an ambush. I get that; Indians are terrible at fighting, have no composure or strategy and are cowardly to boot so they had no chance against any real fighting force. Fine. But what I do not understand is how in Satan's rectum did they end up with awards for it?? As far as I know, that's a little extra retardation even for India, or am I giving India too much credit? So, did they lie and basically tell the story in reverse (like Chinese ambushed Indians with a 10X numeric advantage and were armed and Indians got a 5:1 kill ratio) all the way up so that the guys on top thought that it was actually true and thus awarded them medals for the bravery they exhibited in their alternate reality, or were they honest to their superiors and the Indian officials decided to award them the medals to make the Indian people think that their soldiers acted like heroes? Basically, when the Chinese video went public proving India had lied about everything, did everyone in New Delhi just bury their heads like the jig is up or did everyone give the death stare to their subordinate for lying and try to find out who it stemmed from? Do you know or can you find out? That'd be really interesting; thanks.

Let’s not act like the Jai Hinds here. Reliable sources indicate that the PLA had slight numeric advantage after reinforcements have arrived.
 

Sardaukar20

Junior Member
Registered Member
Let's hope this can lead to release more pictures or video from China
So Capt Soiba Maningba Rangnamei survived the battle of Galwan then? Lucky b*stard! He was one of the first Jawans who was involved in the cowardly ambush of a PLA negotiation party. When the PLA finally put up a fight. He and his fellow Jawans fled the battlefield like roaches. Leaving his other injured Jawans behind. And he gets an award?

Its simple, because he appeared in the now famous 9-minute Chinese Galwan video. So he must actually thank China, not India for the award. Because for 8-months after Galwan, he was nothing to India. This award is a sh*tshow, because Capt Soiba Maningba Rangnamei had nothing to show for it but failure and cowardice. The most shameful achievement for any soldier.

This is an India that we are familiar with now. A nation that awards failures. That is why the BJP with all their disastrous policies continues to secure high approval rating. This is why India continues to miss 'Superpower' goals. This is why India continues to lose ground behind China and the rest of Asia. This is why India will never become a peer competitor to China, no matter how much favours it curries with the West.
 
Last edited:
Let’s not act like the Jai Hinds here. Reliable sources indicate that the PLA had slight numeric advantage after reinforcements have arrived.
Oh, my bad; was it a different fight or unreliable? Someone here said 600 vs 70 and I thought it was that fight. There's so much false information coming out of India it's really hard to keep track.
 

siegecrossbow

Brigadier
Staff member
Super Moderator
Oh, my bad; was it a different fight or unreliable? Someone here said 600 vs 70 and I thought it was that fight. There's so much false information coming out of India it's really hard to keep track.

PLA was initially heavily outnumbered, but I don’t think that Indian troops ever numbered over 200. Initial contingent of PLA troops (armed) were around twenty as seen in video but we don’t know if there are more. The 600 vs 70 claim is pretty much bogus.
 
PLA was initially heavily outnumbered, but I don’t think that Indian troops ever numbered over 200. Initial contingent of PLA troops (armed) were around twenty as seen in video but we don’t know if there are more. The 600 vs 70 claim is pretty much bogus.
Wait, so if we don't know there are more, this could have been a 200 vs 20 fight? That's worse for the Indians than 600 vs 70.
 

Sardaukar20

Junior Member
Registered Member

This Chinese Youtuber's opinion and analysis of the recent 9-minute Galwan video by China. Its an interesting video. He analyzes where exactly is the location of the clash, the 'Chinese-looking' Jawan, what Indian transgressions were observed, and finally him paying his own tributes to the fallen PLA soldiers. I prefer to watch this over any of the utter BS coming out of India.
 

Top