Ladakh Flash Point


twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
No wonder people say your evidence is garbage. Your first link is a picture with an arrow that says "Google told a lie" and your second image is a Google map picture with a marker on the clash site. It's so meaningless and stupid there's nothing to debunk.

Where is the evidence connecting what China did with the dotted line drawn in the second photo? Why does your first picture call Google a liar and then the second one use Google as a reference to trust? Your arguments and your logic are complete trash just like India's attempts to steal territory from China.
That picture was posted by a Chinese user. It is matched by China's historic claim.
 

Xsizor

Senior Member
Registered Member
before 1962, there was no lac. Isn't that clear?
That question is to you.

Aren't you clear? Before or since then LAC wasn't mutually agreed upon or dilineated.

What we have are either country's their own interpretation of LAC.
 
That picture was posted by a Chinese user.
LOLOL What does it claim? Google is a liar? LOLOL So then you used Google maps asking us to trust its line and that its line means something that you claim, not even something that Google claims? "A Chinese user" is your citation?? Is it a media source? And official government source? Or just a random internet guy named "leegun hamlet" which you say is Chinese for some reason? That is actually worth laughing out loud at.

I'm a PhD, kid. Bullcrap evidence doesn't fly. I've refuted and rejected evidence that could fool itself into peer-reviewed scientific publications so don't gimme this garbage that could get you laughed at by a MacDonald's employee and tell me it's "evidence."
It is matched by China's historic claim.
This doesn't answer any of my questions and a historic claim does not equal what China tried to take this time. This is why people who know what they are talking about answer every question in a point to point and people who don't try to BS through with short nonsense like you.
 
Last edited:

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
Interesting how a PhD doesn't know basic satellite imagery interpretation, since any literate person can see the available satellite imagery from third party sources like Maxar and Planet labs shows India did not lose territory.
 
Interesting how you still cannot make a point-to-point response, because you need to avoid the real questions.
Then I guess they don't teach satellite imagery interpretation in PhD programs,
No, they don't teach you to draw an arrow on a map saying "Google is a liar" then make claims about what lines mean according to whatever you wish them to represent. That will get you kicked out of the program for basic lack of logical reasoning if you were to ever present something like that to a committee. They would consider such a person unteachable due to poor foundation.
since any literate person can see the available satellite imagery from third party sources like Maxar and Planet labs shows India did not lose territory.
Well show them here. I only went with what you showed. Any literate person would know that you don't show a modified Google image and then refer to Maxar and Planet Labs as your evidence LOL. By the way, do those sources claim to provide live updated control lines for conflict zones or do they just show what is historically accepted?

PS. Moving on to other evidence does not exonerate you from your previous attempts to use nonsensical, indefensible evidence.
 
Last edited:

Xsizor

Senior Member
Registered Member
Interesting how a PhD doesn't know basic satellite imagery interpretation, since any literate person can see the available satellite imagery from third party sources like Maxar and Planet labs shows India did not lose territory.
Interesting how you invalidate the words of a Patrol Troop Commander for Phds or think tank shills.

(Galwan)
 

Mohsin77

Junior Member
Registered Member
Funny how you go back to that Thousand years stuff.
So when I do it, that's unfair? But when your Prime Minister and his BJP/RSS make up an entire imaginary history of "India" which never existed, that's okay? lolz

Which country was Pakistan a part of then?
The same one that conquered and ruled you for centuries and brought some actual culture to your land... Your welcome.

p.s. Please clean the Taj Mahal, you've literally turned it yellow.

It is also telling you have not even addressed any of my points.
You don't have any "points", just random attempts at distraction which I don't fall for.

Simple question. When since 1947 has Pakistan gained territory?

"Since"? You still haven't dealt with what we gained in '47. We conquered and liberated 1/3rd of Kashmir which we still hold. On the other hand, the only territory which India holds which it captured from Pakistan by force are some barren frozen rocks in Siachin.
 
Last edited:

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
So now the people who were actually ruled and conquered for centuries are now having fantasies of ruling others lol. Finest example of Stockholm syndrome.
 
So now the people who were actually ruled and conquered for centuries are now having fantasies of ruling others lol. Finest example of Stockholm syndrome.
Woowwwww You are uneducated. Stockholm Syndrome is falling in love with your captors and embracing your captivity. Indians are supposed to be at least good at English; must you degenerate to become incompetent at absolutely everything??
 

Top