I'm sorry, there is actually a way to increase array size even if the cross sectional area is reduced.
Quickie, here is the way using an analogy.
You get a sausage. Slice the sausage in the vertical. Now you get a sliced area that is round. That will be your array face.
Want to increase the array area with a limited diameter? Now try slicing starting from the middle, the cutting it forward to create a slanted cut. Or just to make it simple, cut it in a canted way.
Now if you look at the cut area, its bigger, though the shape is oval and the face is canted.
The drawbacks is that the canted array face cannot be moved. Its fixed. So it requires a PESA or an AESA to do any form of scanning.
So its possible with such a nose that you can retain the same array area, with a slight length increase, though I'm not that happy with the sacrifices in the lack of mechanical flexibility.
Quickie, here is the way using an analogy.
You get a sausage. Slice the sausage in the vertical. Now you get a sliced area that is round. That will be your array face.
Want to increase the array area with a limited diameter? Now try slicing starting from the middle, the cutting it forward to create a slanted cut. Or just to make it simple, cut it in a canted way.
Now if you look at the cut area, its bigger, though the shape is oval and the face is canted.
The drawbacks is that the canted array face cannot be moved. Its fixed. So it requires a PESA or an AESA to do any form of scanning.
So its possible with such a nose that you can retain the same array area, with a slight length increase, though I'm not that happy with the sacrifices in the lack of mechanical flexibility.