You obviously have trouble reading, because I clearly stated that the lines used in the satellite imagery is the same lac used since 1962, as confirmed by Google Earth's lines.
And the map clearly shows sectors other than just pangong, including galwan, gogra, and hot springs. In all of those areas, pla is behind the Indian perception of the lac. Are you even able to read at this point?
All the articles I presented about the disengagent at Galwan were written well before the pangong disengagement was completed
That Bloomberg article was written before disengagent was completed, hence is useless in this discussion.
You're the one who's using logical fallacies here. You are claiming that some Indian media reporting is proof of India admitting it lost territory. However, you are ignorant of the fact that India doesn't have state run media in the same sense that China does, and all the Indian sources you posted are partisan in nature and clearly biased against the current Indian government. There are countless Indian media sources showing that India did not lose territory, but I have chosen not to use them in favor of more unbiased and neutral sources such as andalou and al Jazeera which debunk your sources.
As for your "front line" claims, China's initial incursion was 400 meters from the lac. After the disengagent it withdrew over 2 kilometers. You do the math as to where that puts pla relative to the lac. So in a way, you are actually right. China didn't withdraw to the lac, it withdrew behind the lac. In case you haven't realized, the lac is the red line used in the satellite images posted.
You have still failed to provide any concrete evidence which shows India lost territory. Just sources spreading politically motivated lies and here say from Indian opposition politicians. I have already provided unbiased sources from various international media sources and satellite images debunking them.
Last edited:
