The front line and the lac are literally the same thing in this context. Check Google Earth because it's pretty clear you have no idea where the lac even is yet you are trying to lecture me on it. I have also shown you multiple satellite images showing the lac in comparison to the Chinese pullback under disengagent.
You only further display your ignorance by claiming that the sources I presented are based on a post pangong to status quo, when none of them even mentioned pangong disengagent and were from 2020, months before China pulled back from pangong.
Again, check Google Earth. The "front line" is the same lac which has been in place since 1962. Nothing changed in 2020.
And which sources have I used which were biased towards Indians? Unless you think scmp, andalou, and al Jazeera are Indian biased sources lol. You're the one who consistently posts partisan and biased Indian sources and ignores all the satellite imagery I have posted showing no pla presence in Indian territory.
Final thing:
Front line and LAC are not the same thing in this context. The place where the Galwan valley clash occurred was centred in the buffer zone between India's LAC and China's LAC. Satellite imagery was given but you chose to ignore it.
"Check Google Earth because it's pretty clear you have no idea where the lac even is yet you are trying to lecture me on it."
Refrain from using an ad hominem as a point without structuring an argument to actually represent it
"You only further display your ignorance by claiming that the sources I presented are based on a post pangong to status quo, when none of them even mentioned pangong disengagent and were from 2020, months before China pulled back from pangong."
You legit gave me a twitter source that pertained to just "PangongTso" basic English comprehension has failed it appears.
"Again, check Google Earth. The "front line" is the same lac which has been in place since 1962. Nothing changed in 2020."
Frontline =/= LAC. By that logic what exactly happened in Galwan? Indian soldiers trying to swallow up buffer zone territory by constructing fortifications. That was the frontline.
"And which sources have I used which were biased towards Indians? Unless you think scmp, andalou, and al Jazeera are Indian biased sources lol."
Never said this, I said that the sources, some of which I have used were biased in favour of Indians. Which goes to show how even the Indian state media acknowledges territorial loss. See, you're just trying to use the red herring fallacy over and over and over again to defer the actual point of the argument. You can't even structure a coherent point so you resort to logical fallacies.
"You're the one who consistently posts partisan and biased Indian sources and ignores all the satellite imagery I have posted showing no pla presence in Indian territory."
You showed one drawing and one satellite image. Of which you ignored multiple of my own, including Bloomberg.
Your twitter source, under the main topic legit proves my point. Both sides withdrew but not to the LAC. This is a laughable cope.
And most importantly, it is Chinese territory. It is an integral part of Tibet which got siphoned over to India by the British.
I'm not going to bother with anymore petty disputes, because clearly you're arguing for the sake of your own ego, and not to find the truth.
