Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Clango

New Member
Registered Member
I

I have a feeling Zhao Dashuai is right, India will purchase the Su-57. You can't only love arms race when you're winning. Dropping the six gen fighters last Dec was a brilliant strategic move.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Russia offers India its most advanced Su-57 stealth fighter jet​

I honestly do not understand this complete obsession with ToT, what good will it do if they so hopelessly lack the institutions to the point that now they still can't get something that's at best an analogue to the Jeff in actual mass production? And what kind of pipe dream do they keep having that someone somehow is going to be stupid enough to give them 100% ToT?
 
Last edited:

Ajatshatru089

Just Hatched
Registered Member
What qualifications does India have to attack its neighbor's territory? Does India consider itself the United States or Israel?
Did they announce their combat targets before the airstrikes? They just launch missiles and inform everyone that whatever is hit is their intended target. It's like if I shoot an arrow at random and then draw a target where the arrow lands, I can claim I've always hit the target.
I'm also highly skeptical of India's claims of success. The only clear case of significant damage was to an air force hangar. The damage from the other attacks might not even be worth the cost of the BrahMos missiles!
Conducting military operations to eliminate terrorist hideouts in Pakistan is a declared policy of India. Pakistan is the only country in South Asia into which India has carried out military interventions.

Not every target was struck with BrahMos, Storm Shadow, SCALP, kamikaze drones, and GPS-guided artillery; were also used.

To evaluate the effectiveness of the operations, the Indian Army and Air Force have released satellite imagery and drone footage of the targeted infrastructure, which independent analysts around the world have used for damage assessment.

MAXAR and Mizar have also released very-high-resolution satellite images of the targeted infrastructure in Pakistan.
 

Puss in Boots

New Member
Registered Member
Conducting military operations to eliminate terrorist hideouts in Pakistan is a declared policy of India. Pakistan is the only country in South Asia into which India has carried out military interventions.

Not every target was struck with BrahMos, Storm Shadow, SCALP, kamikaze drones, and GPS-guided artillery; were also used.

To evaluate the effectiveness of the operations, the Indian Army and Air Force have released satellite imagery and drone footage of the targeted infrastructure, which independent analysts around the world have used for damage assessment.

MAXAR and Mizar have also released very-high-resolution satellite images of the targeted infrastructure in Pakistan.
In return, will India accept Pakistan's military intervention?
Don't these videos and photos confirm my conclusion? Aside from that hangar being a high-value target, the others are either runways or empty areas. I don't see any significant value in them. I'm not denying that Pakistan was harmed in the airstrike, but rather refuting India's exaggeration of its own airstrike results.
 
Top