You just countered your own bloody statement with that last sentence. The population is important but it's not the most important. You seem to defect a lot of issues onto China and at this time I'm begging to wonder if you are trolling us. A large population doesn't mean jack if there is nothing to support it. Look at China in the last 40 years and see how it got itself to today.The nationalists in Taiwan do not seem to be
actually, go forth an multiply is much of the key. the best predictor of Long term economic power tends to be population, provided the population can be supported. population is the fundamental reason is why Germany surpassed france and britain, why the united states surpassed britain and germany, and population really is the only reason why china will surpass the united states. So long as the population does not exceed the carrying capacity of the land, and the development is not artificially suppressed, and relatively free commerce in capital, product snd raw material is available, ratio of economic output in the long run trends towards ratio of population.
As to why India economic output remain below that of some of G7 for 70 years despite having popukation larger than all of G7, hmmmm, good question. China’s population has also always been greater than that of the g7 combined, yet Chinese economic output remain less than that of some of the G7 for 150 years. maybe you should ask the chinese why.