No no, there isnt any lack of understanding on my part. Intent has always been what the Chinese stress on.
Look, you were the one that brought in how other countries have dealt with independence movements using classic whatabout-tactics. It's not my fault that you didn't understand the reality of the situation in the country you first mentioned - Spain - given that it hasn't banned the independence movement, just stopped it unilaterally declaring independence. You then tried to complain that China was being asked to do something that no one else would do, and I again pointed out that there are various countries that not just live with independence movements but have given them legal referenda that (if they had been successful) would have given them independence.
If you want to say "China is doing what it thinks is best", fine. But don't try to pretend it's acting as everyone else would.
All the so called independence movements you mentioned from the western hemisphere has no foreign backing and thus its all talk with no eventual result.
You honestly think that Quebec and Scotland having three legal referenda between them, which would have been respected by the national governments
and therefore led to independence, is just "talk with no eventual result"? The 1995 Quebec referendum only just failed with over 49% of people voting for independence. About 50,000 votes made the difference.
The hongkong independence movement, on the other hand, is openly backed by US Congress funded NGOS to destabilise China
Funding given to the independence movement wasn't necessarily about mainland China. But even if it was, independence political parties are now banned. There's no need to criminalise private citizens making statements about independence if they have no pro-independence parties to vote for.
with dissidents being summoned to Congress hearing implying US has more juridical power over HK than PRC
If they're US residents, then yes they can be summoned to Congress. The same would be the case in the UK for Westminster and probably any country where the legislative can call witnesses.
As for people resident outside of the US, it's up to them if they attend or not. China isn't going to allow the FBI to pick up local residents if they don't want to travel to Washington. If any HK residents have testified in Congress it's because they want to draw attention to an issue like whether the CCP has been interfering in HK's autonomy. That seems understandable.
Are you sure you're not sore about the fact that HK/Chinese citizens
wanted to go to testify in Congress?
JW and fellow movement members flown to taiwan island for training on how to stage riots
You don't need training on how to riot. Chinese people have rioted on the mainland in the past, such as due to Japanese foreign policy. Did they need to be trained by the PLA first, or did they just start smashing stuff up? It was the latter.
Equally, if some HK protesters got training on ways they can protest more effectively (including disrupting HK's infrastructure), that has nothing to do with censoring the views of private HK citizens. It might be a reason to ban travel to Taiwan, but not censoring verbal arguments.
NGOs funding bails for rioters caught setting shops on fire, littering hazardous objects on rail of hsr.
I'm not sure I understand. Are you suggesting bail should be set at a rate the accused is unable to pay? In that case bail might as well be refused.