Indian carrier does not have bulbous bow to stabilize the front of the carrier.@Temstar bro if you ask any Indian their responds are it was part of design and the performance is impressive but from an expert point of view that is a wobbly ship.
Indian carrier does not have bulbous bow to stabilize the front of the carrier.@Temstar bro if you ask any Indian their responds are it was part of design and the performance is impressive but from an expert point of view that is a wobbly ship.
@FairAndUnbiased I know bro, I've been browsing PDF and the conversation there had been AMUSING...lolIndian carrier does not have bulbous bow to stabilize the front of the carrier.
If that's the problem could you fix it by adding one retrospectively to the hull?Indian carrier does not have bulbous bow to stabilize the front of the carrier.
And they say China cuts corners.
"The real reason why Vikrant did not install the bulbous bow lies in its manufacturer. Because the manufacture of the bulbous bow is extremely complicated, you need to bend a few centimeters of high-strength steel plate into the required three-dimensional curved surface and then weld it into a sphere. There can be no mistakes in the process, otherwise it will cause serious consequences. The Cochin Shipyard lacks the necessary manufacturing equipment and technical personnel, and the designers are happy to save trouble. After all, the blade-shaped bow is a steel plate welded to the end, which saves money and everyone has less trouble."
If true that is dumb AF.
Here's the photo.If that's the problem could you fix it by adding one retrospectively to the hull?
Is that wake normal? The bow of the ship seems to be bobbing up and down to an unusual degree?