US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Incredible the same day !!!

View attachment 28147
View attachment 28148
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Engines matter or takeoff or landing are a delicate phase ? o_O

Anytime you change power settings on a turbine or a recip you could run into trouble, strange occurance to have both incidents on the same day, Air Force driver could have ridden his bird in for a belly landing, LOL, parts of that bird will fly again likely.

For the Marine pilot killed with the Blues, I'm having thoughts of the dirty roll on take-off that one of the two solo's do???? this just keeps popping into my mind as I try to imagine what could cause a catastrophic accident on departure, in a twin engine aircraft, where you couldn't eject???

Anyway, modern turbines are very reliable, but the aircraft flown by the Blues and T-Birds are often high time birds, but they receive very superior maintenance, in the case of the Blues, these F-18s may have passed their life limited number of traps on board a carrier?

The dirty roll on take-off is performed with the gear and flaps extended at a relatively low airspeed, around 175-200 knts I would guess? Losing an engine or becoming dis-oriented could cause such an accident??? very sorrowful to lose a hero, but the Blues and T-Birds do some seriously crazy things in very close proximity to the ground and other aircraft???
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Thanks Buddy :)

Anyway, modern turbines are very reliable, but the aircraft flown by the Blues and T-Birds are often high time birds, but they receive very superior maintenance, in the case of the Blues, these F-18s may have passed their life limited number of traps on board a carrier?
How many flight hours ? old ? but surely well maintained and a really possible to rotate fihgters coz
Blue Angels have 21 F-18 ! in more "Fat Albert" :) and Boeing have begin modified for them Super Hornet.

Thunderbirds have 10 F-16C/D Block 52 the more recent in service not old
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
... In this case while Boeing is eating the cost overrun, it nevertheless put timeline risk onto the USAF.
well, let's see about "eating the cost overrun":
Since Boeing plans to sell at least 179 tankers to the Air Force that $1.3 billion becomes easily absorbable, over the long term.
according to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


related:
Boeing’s Penalty For Latest KC-46 Delay Still Unclear
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Replace Helfire, Maverick and Tow

JAGM beats Hellfire capability in early live-fire test

The US Army has proven in a recent live-fire test that a MQ-1 Gray Eagle with a Lockheed Martin joint air to ground missile (JAGM) can beat the capability offered today by the AGM-114 Hellfire against moving targets.

The General Atomics Aeronautics Systems (GAAS)-build unmanned air system (UAS) successfully tracked and engaged a pick-up truck moving at 20mph on Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, using the dual-mode seeker on the JAGM, says Col James Romero, Joint Tactical Munitions project manager.
An MQ-1 platform, which includes the US Air Force’s Predator, requires an operator with great skill to a hit a moving target with a Hellfire missile, Romero says. But the latest live fire test at Dugway shows the JAGM should be far more reliable as a weapon against mobile targets.

“For Hellfire to hit a moving target from a Predator platform is highly dependent on the skill of the operator and manoeuvrability of that moving target and the latency of Predator platform itself,” Robero says. “[The JAGM] will essentially give an assured strike or hit on a moving target every time.”

The test also marked the first airborne launch of a JAGM missile during the 10-month old engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) phase of the $1.5 billion programme. The army also has performed six more ground-launch tests of the JAGM, with all seven shots so far hitting the target, Romero says.

Although involved in early testing, the Gray Eagle is still years away from full integration with JAGM. The army’s priority is to qualify the missile first on the Boeing AH-64 Apache and US Marine Corps Bell Helicopter AH-1Z Viper helicopters. A series of 48 live fire tests on both platforms is scheduled to begin by the end of the year, Romero says. The MQ-1C integration would come after both helicopters are declared operations, which is now scheduled in September 2018, according to the US Government Accountability Office.

The army awarded the EMD contract to Lockheed last August after receiving only one bid. Raytheon had declined to offer a competing missile with a tri-mode seeker, saying the army’s evaluation offered no credit for the additional capability offered by integrating a third seeker.

In the recent Dugway test, the Lockheed JAGM’s dual-mode seeker performed “perfectly,” Romero says. The test was conducted on a clear day with no atmospheric distortions or countermeasures used, he adds.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

USA JAGM.jpg
 

Bernard

Junior Member
1*0oAwNBg24xGZQDV2JC-AWg.jpeg

M-1 Abrams tanks at a firing range in Latvia on Nov. 6, 2014. U.S. Army photo
The U.S. Army’s Upgraded Abrams Tank Has Several Surprises
What’s important is on the inside
by DAVE MAJUMDAR

General Dynamics Land Systems will start to deliver the first production M-1A2 SEP V3 Abrams to the U.S. Army starting in 2017. Out of a total of nine prototypes built, the company has delivered seven prototype tanks for field-testing at the Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona and the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland.

“Testing commenced in Jan. 2015 and ends in Mar. FY2020,” said Donald Kotchman, General Dynamics Land Systems’ vice president for tracked combat vehicles in a statement to The National Interest. “Prototypes are currently in reliability tests and performing well.”

According to Kotchman, the Army will start to field the new Abrams model starting in the third quarter of fiscal year 2020.


1*sM5KaHIm9YBzwgMbVv8RNg.png

However, unlike most Pentagon acquisitions programs, the upgraded Abrams will not enter “low rate initial production” or “full-rate production.” Instead, the Army is developing the SEP V3 as an Engineering Change Proposal.

“Instead of LRIP/FRP these are ECP vehicles and initial production deliveries commence in 2017,” Kotchman said. “Fielding is expected to begin in Q3 FY2020.”

Right now, GDLS is on contract to build six initial upgraded tanks, but eventually the Army hopes to remanufacture its entire M-1A2 SEP fleet into the new configuration. “We have a contract for six pilot vehicles and are working follow on orders. The Army currently plans to put the V3 capability into all of its M-1A2SEP vehicles,” Kotchman said.

Though the M-1A2 SEP V3 was developed as an ECP, the upgrade adds significant new capabilities to the Abrams. GDLS was originally awarded the contract for the Abrams ECP1a Program in September 2012. At its core, the program was an engineering development program to improve the Abrams’ “Size Weight and Power-Cooling” capacity as the tank was running out of room to grow.

“The ECP1a program is characterized as the ‘Power Package’ to include improvements to various systems to aid the soldier in future fights,” Kotchman said.

According to General Dynamics, some of the major improvements within the ECP1a program include increased power generation and distribution capacity. “Soldiers have a requirement for additional electrical power in order to use advanced technologies and improved capability in the future,” Kotchman said.

The new Abrams variant includes improved connectivity — allowing for better communications with advanced network capabilities. Tank crews are afforded vastly improved displays and man-machine interfaces that should enhance their situational awareness.

The SEP V3 also has improved survivability and lethality compared to older Abrams models. Kotchman said that the vehicle has advanced abilities to defeat improvised explosive devices and has an upgraded armor package. The addition of a new Ammunition Data Link supports use of advanced new ammunition types that are either already fielded or will be fielded in the near future.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Meanwhile, life for maintenance crews gets easier with the addition of a new vehicle health management system that supports off-vehicle reporting of maintenance status. “New Line Replaceable Modules” help to improve diagnostics and repair, which should greatly improve vehicle availability due to decreased downtime.

The addition of a new under-armor auxiliary power unit helps to reduce fuel consumption and should lessen the wear and tear on the tank’s Honeywell AGT1500C gas turbine engine.

Kotchman deferred comment about whether the Army needs to develop new tank to defeat the new
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
as the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Berlin is clearly concerned by the Armata and is hoping to develop an entirely new main battle tank to counter it.

However, Kotchman did say that the M-1A2 SEP V3 is just one of the upgrades in the pipeline for the Abrams. He deferred comment to the U.S. Army about the nature of those potential additions. “The Army is considering additional engineering changes that would add capability to the Abrams tank,” Kotchman said.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

You think that with widespread usage of the Abrams tank around the world, especially ones dumped in Iraq. Russia for sure has gotten their hands on many of them and learned a lot about them.
 
Last edited:

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
You think that with widespread usage of the Abrams tank around the world, especially ones dumped in Iraq. Russia for sure has gotten their hands on many of them and learned a lot about them.
The ones given to Iraq were downgraded from SEP2, and Although it's likely the Russians gained access the nation I am more worried gained close access was and is Iran.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Record number of countries to take part in RIMPAC 2016

With four new participants, the number of countries taking part in RIMPAC, the world’s largest international maritime exercise, rose to 27.

45 ships, five submarines, more than 200 aircraft and 25,000 personnel will participate in the biennial Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise scheduled June 30 to August 4, in and around the Hawaiian Islands and Southern California.

This is the first time that Brazil, Denmark, Germany, and Italy are participating in RIMPAC. Additional firsts will involve flexing the command and control structure for various at sea events and incorporating a submarine rescue exercise.

Other participants will be forces from Australia, Brazil, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, People’s Republic of China, Peru, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga, the United Kingdom and the United States.

This year will see amphibious operations in the Southern California operating area, feature a harpoon missile shoot from a U.S. Navy littoral combat ship and highlight fleet innovation during the Trident Warrior experimentation series.

RIMPAC 2016 is the 25th exercise in the series that began in 1971. Hosted by U.S. Pacific Fleet, RIMPAC 2016 will be led by U.S. Vice Adm. Nora Tyson, commander of the U.S. 3rd Fleet (C3F), who will serve as the Combined Task Force (CTF) Commander.

Royal Canadian Navy Rear Adm. Scott Bishop will serve as deputy commander of the CTF, and Japan Maritime Self Defense Force Rear Adm. Koji Manabe as the vice commander.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Unusual and interesting

"Stealthy Blackhawk"

A couple of years ago a top secret US helicopter emerged. It is commonly referred as Stealthy Blackhawk, however it is not its original name. This helicopter was first observed in 2011 during a raid in Pakistan, that took down Osama Bin Laden. At least two helicopters were used during that raid and carried US Navy SEALs. During the operation one of these helicopters was damaged, became inoperable and made a hard landing. After the operation the SEALs blew it up with explosives. However tail section of the stealthy helicopter survived. There were absolutely no official comments regarding this helicopter. The whole development program and any official details on this stealthy helicopters are kept in high secrecy.

It is believed that these stealthy helicopters have been used by elite special operation forces for years without the public's knowledge. And it seems that all of their missions were successful, or at least all secret helicopters managed to return to their bases. Black paint of this helicopter, as well as other design features, such as reduced radar cross-section and low noise levels indicate, that these special forces helicopters are intended to operate at night, when it is difficult to spot them. These helicopters operate fast and at very low altitude in order to avoid detection by radars. It seems that these stealthy helicopters used only on highest priority missions.

Some say that the ghost helicopter is a heavily modified version of the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. However the wreckage of the tail section bears no resemblance to that of the the MH-60 Blackhawk, that is typically used by the US special forces. So likely that this stealthy helicopter has an entirely different design.

It is possible that this stealthy helicopter evolved form the cancelled
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. The Comanche was a stealthy reconnaissance and light attack helicopter, developed since the early 1990s. It had a stealthy airframe built largely of composite materials and a number of other advanced features. A couple of working prototypes were built, that demonstrated exceptional performance. At the time the Comanche was a revolutionary step in stealth technology. However the program was cancelled in 2004. The US Department of Defense promised to use its technology for future projects. However an official program for a stealthy transport helicopter was never publicized.

This secret helicopter has special rotor design that significantly reduces noise levels. Wreckage of the tail rotor shows, that this helicopter uses smaller blades. Also the tail rotor is shielded by disk. It looks like noise of this helicopter easily blends into any background noise. The helicopter is so silent, that adversaries might not even react, until it is too late. Neighbors of the Bin Laden told that they didn't hear the helicopters approaching until they were directly overhead.

The general shape of what was left on the crash site indicates, that the helicopter has harsh angles and flat surfaces. Looks like it is made of special high-tech materials similar to that used in stealthy aircraft. This secret helicopter was obviously designed to have reduced radar cross-section. Its shape and coating absorb and distort radar beams. It is likely that the rotor blades also some kind of radar absorbing or distortion features. Radars of the Pakistani defense forces did not see these helicopters coming in.

This helicopter is operated by a crew of two or three men, including two pilots, and possibly gunner. It can transport around 10-12 fully equipped passengers. Such stealthy transport helicopters allow commandos to sneak up on their target.

Most likely that this helicopter carries some sort of armament to support dismounted troops. It is likely that it has provision for door-mounted machine guns. Also it is possible that it can be fitted with pods with unoperated rockets, as well as and air-to-ground and air-to-air missiles, such as
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Rockets and missiles can be carried inside special weapon bays, or on stub wings.

It is possible that this special forces helicopter has an in-flight refueling probe. This feature is present on many American special forces helicopters, such as the MH-60.

It is likely that some parts of the wreckage form the crash site ended up in China or Russia. It is known that both of these countries are trying to make stealth aircraft.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top