Turkey Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

wifi999

New Member
Registered Member
Only Gökhan-ER if you can even call it that, is officially known. What some still refer to Gökdogan-ER was a phase-II development to increase the range to 100+ km from the original 65+ km. Either that is still under development or it became the default Gökdogan. I'm leaning towards the latter.

And there are 3 different ramjet AAM under development: Gokhan (got its range increased), Gokhan-ER (an even longer ranged Gökhan) and Gökbora (solid-fuel).
It seems that the information I got was incorrect. The article I read said that the Gökdogan-ER is a dual pulse missile while the Gökhan is a ramjet missile.
 

CasualObserver

Junior Member
Registered Member
What some still refer to Gökdogan-ER was a phase-II development to increase the range to 100+ km from the original 65+ km.
We got that 65+ km range figure because the inception of the GÖKTUĞ project (Gökdoğan BVR/Bozdoğan VWRAAM) began with the TuAF's need to replace its AMRAAM-Bs, which were procured in relatively large quantities and were at the end of their service life. That's where the '65 km' figure comes from, because those missiles have a range of 65 km, whereas Gökdoğan's figure refers to its 'effective range (mind you, not the NEZ!). However, as Gökdoğan got developed, it became more of an AMRAAM-C5/C7 analogue and has been reported to have a similar range (the former head of the SSB once revealed on TV by mistake that its actual range was over 100+ km).

In the recent BVRAAM launch test of the Kızılelma, the missile shot down a target drone from 30 nmi away, which is roughly the same operational range as AMRAAM-Cs.

We have no recent updates on the fate of the Gökdoğan-ER, which is an AMRAAM-D equivalent. But logic dictates that it must be under development to bridge the gap between the C5-equivalent Gökdoğan and the ramjet-propelled Gökbora (as well as the even longer-ranged, inherently larger ramjet Gökhan).
 

CasualObserver

Junior Member
Registered Member
T Link is a tactical data link. Even though it is much better than Link-16 it isn't suitable for in-arm links. Maybe it is the new name of Aselsan IVDL, which is for Kaan
Isn't it exclusively for in-wing Kaans, since we haven't heard about usage on any other platforms from Aselsan? Though a similar conformal LPI datalink specialized for general use by any platform based off of IVDL could be "swiftly" developed...
 

Radonislav

Junior Member
Registered Member
Isn't it exclusively for in-wing Kaans, since we haven't heard about usage on any other platforms from Aselsan? Though a similar conformal LPI datalink specialized for general use by any platform based off of IVDL could be "swiftly" developed...
It isn't (or shouldn't be) hard to integrate it to Anka-3 and Kızılelma
 
Top