Two T-62's for 6 or 7 Ukr loaded BMP/M113 and T-64's seems like a pretty good exchange to me.
They both were hit, but doesnt fit the narrative being pushed by the squad
The War in the Ukraine
- Thread starter SampanViking
- Start date
They both were hit, but doesnt fit the narrative being pushed by the squad
Broccoli
Senior Member
They have lost a lot more than just two T-62MV's in Kherson.
I'm still waiting that Kharkiv trap I was told about few weeks ago.
Sure, but so have been the Ukranians losses you are pretending are not happening in Kherson. So, we have images of two disabled T-62's while past few days we keep seeing videos of ukranian BMP, APC and MBT pushing just to get hit by artillery, running over their own crews while fleeng, and so on.
So, more than a fair trade.
Last time I checked, the war isnt over. We might even get a repeat of the Continuation War with just as much nazi denialism
Last edited:
Lol this is basic stuff, if Russia didn't have it by themselves and still failed to get it from China... Yeah... For the future of Russia's viability as an ally, large parts of the current leadership needs to go.
Then again, much misinfo circulating right now, safer to wait a week and see what the gains, losses and casualties look like.
That’s a serious accusation. Deceptive use of military insignia is a war crime according to the Hague Convention:
“Article 23(f) of the 1899 Hague Regulations provides: “It is especially prohibited … to make improper use of … the national flag or military ensigns and uniform of the enemy.”
Similarly according to the ICC statute:
“Pursuant to Article 8(2)(b)(vii) of the 1998 ICC Statute, “[m]aking improper use … of the flag or of the military insignia and uniform of the enemy … resulting in death or serious personal injury” is a war crime in international armed conflicts.”
“Article 23(f) of the 1899 Hague Regulations provides: “It is especially prohibited … to make improper use of … the national flag or military ensigns and uniform of the enemy.”
Similarly according to the ICC statute:
“Pursuant to Article 8(2)(b)(vii) of the 1998 ICC Statute, “[m]aking improper use … of the flag or of the military insignia and uniform of the enemy … resulting in death or serious personal injury” is a war crime in international armed conflicts.”
Well, it looks like the Russians are retreating/another frontline collapsing right now (pick what you like) in the northern part of East of the Dnieper river in the Kherson oblast. I thought that they're going to keep it at all cost but the Russians proved me wrong (again).
Agree. And it’s pretty much what most experts have stated since the beginning of this war. Russia can’t enforce a no fly zone in strategic areas of Ukraine because they don’t have the trainings, tactics and experience. Even worse, their ground troops are badly trained as well.
Last edited:
Tha most likelly missile sponge.
Nothing else just a bait.
I don't understand this, how the HARM know the GPS coordinate of the radar ?
Could you explain it please ?
Good news, means with simple jammers the enemy will hit they own armor.
Will be interesting.
Last edited by a moderator:
This counts as a war crime, if true. Thought the Ukranians would haver learnt how to be more discrete after figuring out they could get away with executing civilians and blaming them on the Russians
plawolf
Lieutenant General
Oh sweet summer child, it’s only a war crime when it’s the side the west is against doing it.
The Ukrainians have been shelling city centres for 8 years. That’s a crime no matter how you cut it, and what has the west done about that?!