The War in the Ukraine

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
That’s a conclusion based on a lot of unsubstantiated assumptions.

Firstly, you are assuming that all crashed drones will be found. That’s clearly not going to be the case here, especially when we are talking about small commercial stuff that both sides are using in large numbers.

Also, it’s noteworthy to stress that in the overwhelming majority of cases, crashes stuff are first discovered by local civilians who both know the area well and have the luxury of time and freedom of movement to come across them. In the Ukraine case, with the lion share of small drones being used on the frontlines, the likelihood of them being discovered is much reduced since most of the civilian population would have fled and those who haven’t wouldn’t be wondering an active battlefield; and because soldiers are probably too busy fighting or taking cover to notice or care about falling UAVs. Even if they did notice one falling, getting to it is potentially going to be difficult and dangerous.
The point that Ukraine/Russia need to actually find crashed drones is true. Whether there are Russian MALE drones in the Ukrainian countryside waiting to be discovered is another thing.

As for civilian finds that benefits the Ukraine more as most of Ukraine is still controlled by them. Crashed TB-2s get hidden, any Russian drone gets photographed.
Most commercial drones have a return home feature when contact is lost with the controller, and it’s a feature Orlan-10 also have.
True and I was aware of that. My point was that for whatever reason, these systems fail. It happens on a scale far higher than on manned aircraft.
You are also making the assumption that the Russians and Ukrainians are using their drones in the same way, which they are not.

The Russians are showing strike footage from missiles because that’s what they are using for most of the big strategic strikes, for tactical strikes, they use artillery. The Ukrainians don’t have that option, which is why they are reduced to releasing drone footage of tactical strikes against individual vehicles or soldiers.

There is going to be a vast difference in failure and attrition rates of drones from using them for stand-off recon compared to jury-rigging release mechanisms and strapping external loads they were never designed to carry to do poor man UCAV strikes.

You also have to consider the very different detection and AA assets both sides are using.

The Russians are publishing detailed breakdowns of their shootdowns of drones because they are using SAM and other air defence radars to track and engage these drones. The Ukrainians are almost certainly limited to MK1 eyeball for the most case. That means that their ability to detect Russian drones is going to be massively weaker compared to the Russians.

Rather than the Russians not conduction lots of drone operations, it’s more likely that a combination of the Russians using their drones primarily for observation rather than strike, and the lack of effective detection means on the Ukrainian side is creating the false illusion of safety, where the Ukrainians are not even aware that drones are being used against them most of the time.
It's evident that Russia is using lots of Orlan-10 type drones very effectively. Lots of footage has been posted, and a large number of them have been shot down/crashed.

The point I was replying to was Russian use of HALE/MALE combat drones. As I said in the last thread, they are two completely different platforms. There's no reason to limit yourself to one. If Russia was smart they would have realised that their Orion platform wasn't mature enough and before the war bought a large number of Wing Loong drones. If they had done that they could have been unleashing a lot more destruction on Ukraine than Ukrainian TB-2s because of the disparity in air defence. In the end it may not make a difference but it certainly would be handy to have right now.

Alternatively you can believe that Russia are operating Orion in high numbers, but have stopped posting footage of them and they are somehow not losing any over Ukraine.

As for Russia shooting down Ukrainian TB-2, I don't doubt it. Look at the multiple military flights between Turkey and Ukraine and big production surge by the Turkish makers of the TB-2. Most of them are crashing in territory controlled by Ukraine so we don't hear about it and Ukrainians can't paint "Z" on them like they do with their tanks.
 

gelgoog

Brigadier
Registered Member
With the capture of Staryi Saltiv, the Ukrainians are now within artillery range (from the west) of the rail line from Belgorod to Izyum. If that is cut off, the Russian troops in Izyum risk being cut off and encircled from their flank to the north. Ironically despite all the talk of the Ukrainians being encircled, it may be the Russians who find themselves suddenly encircled. I made reference to this when the Russians originally withdrew from the north. I said they needed to defend three fronts- Kherson, Donbas, and Kharkov.
I doubt the Russians would allow that to happen. If necessary they will move troops from Belarus or the troops they are holding back in Russia to counter attack.

They did ok with Kherson and Donbas so far but have been getting massacred near Kharkov. To save their position they probably need to halt their Donbas offensive to reinforce the Kharkov front.
Actually from what I understand the Russians are basically not trying to capture Kharkov at this moment. It is just too large to capture easily with the amount of troops they have in that sector. But yes that is an area where difficult combat is occurring. Kharkov, Izium, and Chernigov were the main areas of Ukrainian resistance in the initial stages of the attack. And we do know Ukraine has some of its best mechanized combat units in the Kharkov region. I expect the Russians to refocus their effort on the larger cities after the pockets in the East around Donbass are taken care of.

It's 70 days into the war. Russia hasn't taken the Donbas, Kiev or even finished rooting out the last holdouts in Mauripol (tomorrow? maybe?)
The active fighting of the Second Chechen War lasted around a year. And Chechnya is much smaller in comparison. The area where Russia is fighting right now in Donbass is largely constituted of urban areas and has been fortified for 8 years. So progress here will not be fast.

Their Blitzkrieg attack at the start proved to be a disaster. Modern technology might have rendered such means obsolete against a well equipped opponent. Now their strategy appears to be grinding their opponent down.
No, I think it worked as reasonably as it could be expected. But the Russians simply did not commit enough troops to do that and secure and capture the fortified and built up areas. So they overextended and were getting their supply columns hit by irregular forces in the north. Since that sector was not critical to the main objectives of the operation at the time, they decided to pull those troops back and refocus the effort around the Donbass to avoid equipment and possibly manpower losses. The fact those armored columns probably did one of the quickest advances in history is going unnoticed by a lot of people. The armored movement all the way from Sumy to the outskirts of Kiev counters claims you hear in Western aligned media that Russia cannot supply their troops at over 100km distance.
 

pmc

Major
Registered Member
It's evident that Russia is using lots of Orlan-10 type drones very effectively. Lots of footage has been posted, and a large number of them have been shot down/crashed.
Orlon-10 drone is much older and mass produced. when word mass produced is it need proper context. it could be 10 times rate of Orion. for example Turkish made automobiles are most expensive relative to features, with imported components and they are relatively mass produced.
TB-2 Drones are not mass produced at all and everything are pre-covid prices unless hidden subsidy.
The point I was replying to was Russian use of HALE/MALE combat drones. As I said in the last thread, they are two completely different platforms. There's no reason to limit yourself to one. If Russia was smart they would have realised that their Orion platform wasn't mature enough and before the war bought a large number of Wing Loong drones. If they had done that they could have been unleashing a lot more destruction on Ukraine than Ukrainian TB-2s because of the disparity in air defence. In the end it may not make a difference but it certainly would be handy to have right now.
there are few video published relative to sorties. There are Fropost-R taking off with two missiles from runway. strike drone impact is too low category to advertize when cruise bang every one hear in the city. I dont think current turbo prop drones have capable radars to track other drones or find emissions, images deep hundreds of kms. it still need fighter to track and direct other drones to zoom in for persistence and than strike. look double tap syria. As i mentioned it is not worth to fly a turbo prop drones from an airfield as every vehicle and storage in that field can become a target..
these are detail improvement to Su-34
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

daifo

Captain
Registered Member
Supposedly the first footage of the Wagner group operating in Ukraine. The scary part for future combatants is the amt of possible smaller recon or offensive drones that may also be on the battlefield.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

anzha

Senior Member
Registered Member
The Ukrainians are saying the Russians are storming the Azovstal steel plant. There are claims the Russians found themselves an Ephialtes in the form of an electrician. Nice story, at least.

While the bunkers are extensive, I expect we'll see them fall pretty soon. Finally.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
The Ukrainians are saying the Russians are storming the Azovstal steel plant. There are claims the Russians found themselves an Ephialtes in the form of an electrician. Nice story, at least.

While the bunkers are extensive, I expect we'll see them fall pretty soon. Finally.
Is there any reason a storming is necessary and just flooding it or sealing the air intakes is not possible?
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Honestly, I don't know. I suspect the Soviets who built it made it pretty tough to take out those ways. I have no proof though.

The Ukrainians stated they also lost communication with the bunkers as well. Sounds like the end.
Interesting. From my understanding any low lying structure can be flooded if there's ingress of water from above, hence why there's always drainage systems on flat roofs and otherwise there's sloped roofs made of waterproof materials.

Given that Azovstal has stair access to the underground complex, and hinged doors are not waterproof (they have no seal on either the hinges side or the lock side) pumping water in seems super easy. If nothing else, dirty water makes their life miserable, increases likelihood of disease for wounded and makes surrender more likely.

The only explanation is if Russia wants to keep using Azovstal later.
 

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
The Ukrainians are saying the Russians are storming the Azovstal steel plant. There are claims the Russians found themselves an Ephialtes in the form of an electrician. Nice story, at least.

While the bunkers are extensive, I expect we'll see them fall pretty soon. Finally.

Russia responded that they aren’t after the Ukrainians claimed they are. Unfortunately, there isn’t really any info to say if did or didn’t storm the steel plant. Russia saying Ukrainians tried to set up firing positions but was repelled.
 
Top