The War in the Ukraine

MortyandRick

Junior Member
Registered Member
With all the attention focused on Donbas and Kherson, the Ukrainians have made a dramatic blitz advance on the Kharkov front in the past 48 hours (advance is 32km in that time).

With the capture of Staryi Saltiv, the Ukrainians are now within artillery range (from the west) of the rail line from Belgorod to Izyum. If that is cut off, the Russian troops in Izyum risk being cut off and encircled from their flank to the north. Ironically despite all the talk of the Ukrainians being encircled, it may be the Russians who find themselves suddenly encircled. I made reference to this when the Russians originally withdrew from the north. I said they needed to defend three fronts- Kherson, Donbas, and Kharkov.

They did ok with Kherson and Donbas so far but have been getting massacred near Kharkov. To save their position they probably need to halt their Donbas offensive to reinforce the Kharkov front.

update from southfront.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

apparently the attack by Ukrainians at north of izyum was repelled.
 

pmc

Major
Registered Member
Russia has suffered significant lost in Ukraine to drones
the word significant you need to put in context. we are now now over 2.5 months into it. we have few videos of drone excluding any Moskova video. drones are for videos and most of them not even colored.. it will be like Pilot making video of every sortie.

second i have vey low opinion about these turbo prop drones that need runway and carry such light load /slow speed.
what if Russian deliberately not wanted to shot down these drones to see where these drones are going back and than send cruise missiles at them and do much much higher damage to human lives that support airforce.
Oniks is high energy weopon so it can go through fortification.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The statement said: “High-precision Onyx missiles hit a logistics center at a military airport in the Odessa area through which foreign weapons were being transported.
The unmanned Bayraktar TB2 drone, as well as missile and ammunition hangers from the United States and European countries, were destroyed.
 

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
what if Russian deliberately not wanted to shot down these drones to see where these drones are going back and than send cruise missiles at them and do much much higher damage to human lives that support airforce.
This already goes towards conspiracy theories.
Simply even slow drones can execute all the same methods to evade detection and intercept "big" aircraft can. And do it with success.

long-neglected loitering aircraft(not only unmanned, by the way!) just made a loud return, for those who thought that 3rd world conflicts weren't indicative enough.
 

pmc

Major
Registered Member
This already goes towards conspiracy theories.
Simply even slow drones can execute all the same methods to evade detection and intercept "big" aircraft can. And do it with success.

long-neglected loitering aircraft(not only unmanned, by the way!) just made a loud return, for those who thought that 3rd world conflicts weren't indicative enough.
its logical thinking not conspiracy theory to find out hideouts of drones and destroy much higher skilled human capital.
hand held and strategic drones are use full.
the problem with these drones i they very lightly loaded, they are very slow (time consuming loading, travel time to target) and they need runways. it hardly give you flexbility to deal with all the targets in one pass. it does not carry rockets, machines guns and bunker busting strike weopons. it will take some time for people to realize that speed of action very important.
 

anzha

Senior Member
Registered Member
It's 70 days into the war. Russia hasn't taken the Donbas, Kiev or even finished rooting out the last holdouts in Mauripol (tomorrow? maybe?)

Russia's down at least 32 BTG: Russia went into the conflict with 130 BTG and now only has 98 BTG in Ukraine. We know Russia has reinforced with Chechens, troops from Ossetia and the far east. That makes the probability Russia has more than lost more than 32 BTG highly likely, imo.

Russia is starting to strike infrastructure it steered away from for a long time. The Russians are conducting over 200 air sorties per day in Ukraine. Missile strikes are a daily occurrence all over Ukraine.

Ukraine has been conducting raids into Russia, not occasionally, but fairly frequently. Several nights in a row Belgorod had its air defenses firing. Other locales within 100 km of the border have been hit. The Ukrainian air force has been seen more recently as well.

The Raputitsa is drying out. General Mud is retiring from the field. Much hangs in the balance.

I'm in "Let's wait and see" mode, but I am very certain I am not going to convince anyone here of much of anything. ;)
 

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
it will take some time for people to realize that speed of action very important.
There are many thousands "speed of action" craft in the world. There are no less than a thousand in action over Ukraine right now.
Yet the ones that are lacking are precisely those that can see from high up for tens of hours. And those that can wait for their chance for the same tens of hours.

Russia, for example, does probably lack fixed-wing aircraft, as VKS have really proven themselves to be just too small(at least their flying part). But it lacks MALE and HALE drones much, MUCH more, as there are literally just a few dozens of them.
it does not carry rockets, machines guns and bunker busting strike weopons.
You're asking too much from a <700kg plane.
Other drones can, there is no written rule that prohibits drones from having more payload.
 

pmc

Major
Registered Member
There are many thousands "speed of action" craft in the world. There are no less than a thousand in action over Ukraine right now.
Yet the ones that are lacking are precisely those that can see from high up for tens of hours. And those that can wait for their chance for the same tens of hours.
any small drone can loiter over the area that will not draw attention.
Russia, for example, does probably lack fixed-wing aircraft, as VKS have really proven themselves to be just too small(at least their flying part). But it lacks MALE and HALE drones much, MUCH more, as there are literally just a few dozens of them.
there more fixed wing aircraft than needed. what can MALE/ HALE drone do that so many other high speed deep penetrating weopons cannot do?.
its war of destroying fortifications and creating meat grinders. so there will be back and forth to force a mistake.
You're asking too much from a <700kg plane.
Other drones can, there is no written rule that prohibits drones from having more payload.
the problem is that maintaining, operating, loading (fuel/weopons) this 700KG plane can draw attention to activity.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Russia has suffered significant lost in Ukraine to drones; however, the recent lost of two patrol boats proves that they haven't learnt. I just wonder it is so difficult to defend against attacks from drones?

If you follow the Russian reports, they allegedly claimed having shot down and destroyed many dozens, if not a hundred or two hundred of drones. They are very specific in the numbers that were shot down or destroyed in the ground, as well as the type of drone, and there are photographs of Russia air defense units with numerous kill markings on them. That the Russians are specific about the numbers suggest to me there is a basis of truth to them, along with Zelensky constantly begging for more drones although I still think there is a bit of exaggeration. Also, there are more drone kills reported in the last few weeks or even days, suggest that the Russian air defenses have gotten past their learning curve in dealing with them, and now frequently killing them. Not only are drones getting shot down, but also Tochka-U and Smerch rockets.
 
Last edited:

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Glad to see the thread back.

Over the last two weeks or so I keep seeing on pro-Russia social media that there are instances of Ukrainian forces selling their western equipment to DNR/LNR militia for cash. A particular instance says the price for a whole armour vehicle was negotiated on USD basis but then militia handed over a stack of rubles for payment. When the Ukrainians complained that rubles is not legal tender here the militias replied "oh don't worry, it will be soon" and then the deal was made.

Is there any basis for such rumour? It would go somewhat to explain the extreme amount of gear Ukrainians are apparently going through.

It's also curious if people are welling to accept rubles outside of Donbas and Kherson currently under Russian control. Surely if you show people a big stash of rubles you are liable to be arrested by SBU for suspected treason.

There are also many retreats by Ukrainian forces and abandoning their weapons. There are also reports that these weapons are not reliable, not easy to use, don't even work.
 
Top