The War in the Ukraine

defenceman

Junior Member
Registered Member
Maybe SU-25 could be a good aerial platform for these types of targets?
Hi,
but can they keep themselves on specific height to get away from these missile range
but why can’t Su 30s can use some less expensive ALCM kind of ground missile or like
wise Ukrainian sea drones Russian can pitch their own kamikaze drones may be
thank you
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
Hi,
but can they keep themselves on specific height to get away from these missile range
but why can’t Su 30s can use some less expensive ALCM kind of ground missile or like
wise Ukrainian sea drones Russian can pitch their own kamikaze drones may be
thank you
S-25L laser guided rocket would not work against these ? Compatible with Su-25 and flankers. Need a targeting pod to tag the target.
 

Soldier30

Senior Member
Registered Member
Ukrainian media published footage of the destruction of a Russian Su-30SM aircraft using an AIM-9M Sidewinder missile launched from new Magura V7 naval drones. The video was filmed on May 2 near Crimea, on that day the Ukrainian army carried out a large-scale attack of naval drones and cruise missiles on Crimea and the city of Novorossiysk. The Su-30 aircraft carried out the destruction of Ukrainian cruise missiles. Despite the fact that Russian FPV drones destroyed Ukrainian naval drones. Apparently, they also decided to use the Su-30 to destroy Magura V7 naval drones. To destroy the naval drones, the Su-30 presumably descended to a low altitude using a 30-mm GSh-301 aircraft cannon. After that, the Su-30 fell within the range of the AIM-9M missile. AIM-9M Sidewinder air-to-air missiles have been produced in the United States since 1983, their range of hitting targets when launched from the ground is up to 7-8 km, the altitude of hitting targets is up to 3-4 kilometers. It is worth noting this is the first hit by the Ukrainian Magura V7 naval drone of a Su-30 aircraft. The pilots were reportedly rescued. The use of the Su-30SM to hit naval drones indicates that the defense of the Crimean coast is insufficiently developed.

 

Soldier30

Senior Member
Registered Member
Footage of the attack of Russian FPV drones on a Ukrainian military column in the Sumy region of Ukraine. Ukrainian military equipment was moving to repel an attack by Russian troops, units of the 83rd Airborne Brigade of Russia in the village of Belovody. As we previously reported, the Russian army entered the territory of the Sumy region of Ukraine. FPV drones "Prince Vandal Novgorodsky" were used by the Russian "Tigers" unit. The Ukrainian military column consists of a Stryker and M113 armored personnel carrier, an American-made HMMWV armored vehicle, a Turkish-made Kirpi armored personnel carrier, and a Soviet-made BTR-80.

 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Helicopter gunships like the Kamov Ka-50 and the Mi series can do the job better.

MALE UCAVs are the perfect tools for this job. High endurance, positive ID capacity, instant strike capability, lower IR signature, high flight ceiling and zero human crew even if they are shot down.

The problem is that Russia doesn’t have such drones in remotely the numbers needed. And ultimately, both sides knows that these sea drone attacks are just harassment and diversionary attacks by Ukraine designed precisely to pull Russian assets from elsewhere and relieve the pressure the Ukrainians are feeling all across the frontlines.
 

sheogorath

Major
Registered Member
So apparently Ukraine managed to lure Su-30SM into a trap. The plane was shot down by Magura sea drone. Armed with R-73.

It obviously call into question on why it has to fly that low in the first place (Well AAM used as SAM's is kinda losing alot of its kinematic performance, e.g Chaparral). Does it need Visual ID the target ? Or it attempt to gun the drone down as They dont really have small weapon in class of Brimestone.

The version keeps changing so I'm going to take it with a grain of salt since now they are claiming it was drones fitted with AIM-9 that shot down two Su-30's as has been mentioned in the thread. They keep changing the version and the evidence provided isn't particularly clear so far.

It wouldn't be the first time either, just like how they recently admited that the "A-50" they shot down was actually the Il-76 with Ukranian POW's
 
Last edited:
Top