It could be to maintain certain distance from the armor, allowing the shaped charge more space to form in case of slat or spaced armor.Are you sure of this? That doesn't sound like the safest contraption to build.
Basically a very rudimentary probe
It could be to maintain certain distance from the armor, allowing the shaped charge more space to form in case of slat or spaced armor.Are you sure of this? That doesn't sound like the safest contraption to build.
HiI totally agree, but - quite understandable - this is something Ukraine will never accept.
Leopard 2's performance has been consistently underwhelming everytime it has been used in combat. It's an overhyped weapon, plain and simple. Everytime Leopard 2 has seen combat it was crewed by NATO members or crew that has actual combat experience AND trained by NATO. Stop blaming the crew and tactics. We have already seen from competitions and actual combat that Ukrainian tankers should be considered satisfactory at the very least. Put German crews in the same situation and we will most likely see far worse disaster than what we have here already. Perhaps if we evaluate it on the same level of T-80BV(M) and T-72B(3) we will get a more balanced understanding of its actual performance. Having more realistic expectation is key.Seems like Germany's worst fears came through, the Leopard 2's reputation is tarnished (even though it has more to do with failure in tactics than the tank itself)
Would Russia recover those abandoned Leopard 2 and send back home for reverse engineer?
Nato tanks and soviet ones are acting the same way... it's not surprising. Would have been way better for Ukraine and Europe to settle things with Minsk 2. What a mess.
Russian troops inspect captured Leopard 2A6.
And here is the video of that other Leopard 2A6 being hit with a Lancet.