Miscellaneous News

siegecrossbow said:

I expect more of European countries to make non-binding rulings. They want to look like human rights warriors but at the same time don’t want to upset China to the extent that trade relations suffer.

Click to expand...

Thanks for emphasizing that.

That is a point about warfare, IIRC.

There should be unity among the troops, and all fighting for the same cause.

In this fuzzy type of warfare between China and the west ...

UNITY!

Who has it, and who does not.

How would that might translate into the events of this fuzzy warfare?

I know I have made my determination.

How the west will undeniably win and China undeniably lose, is for all events and moves to all work for one side only. The side with disunity will make all the right moves, and have everything go their way.

Impossible.

That is the not the real world.



Impossible, because wars are fought in the real world, not theoretical world. Theoretically, anything is possible, USA winning all the time during President Trump reign, of pandemic and money printing. Sure, the white countries can still win against China, but the odds are long.

And we keep fighting.

Chinese government doesn't answer to the West, it answers to the Chinese people (which includes Uyghurs). The goal of bringing South Xinjiang from an agrarian to an industrial society is noble, regardless of what postmodern cultural relativists say. But it must also be recognized that Uyghurs have a separate cultural tradition. The type of modernity China should create in South Xinjiang therefore must be both Chinese and Uyghur.

I'm worried that the Chinese government has gone from one extreme (when Mandarin was barely taught in South Xinjiang) to another extreme (where Uyghur is not taught at schools at all). I understand the benefits of having an unified national curriculum and that Chinese dialects are not taught in school either. But none of the Chinese dialect have their own separate literary tradition as rich as Uyghurs. At the minimal there should be dedicated TV channel and web courses that teach Uyghur language and literature. Secular Uyghur culture and traditions too. Put those resources on YouTube. Some overseas Uyghurs might benefit, and it's going to be difficult to argue China is committing cultural genocide when Uyghur seperatists overseas are using Chinese government resources to teach their children Uyghur language and culture.

Indeed, there are many existing Uyghur language TV channels in Xinjiang. Why ain't them on YouTube already?

Next step should be not to recognize any diplomas coming out of australia
Many Chinese students comes to australia to study accounting and finance, with the promise of getting permanent residency after they graduate
But after they graduate what happens is few of them actually got the job employers always use the excuse of "not enough experience" but actually they prefer whites to do the job
There is no reason why Chinese students can't study accounting or finance in China they are not high tech stem subjects

bajingan said:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Next step should be not to recognize any diplomas coming out of australia
Many Chinese students comes to australia to study accounting and finance, with the promise of getting permanent residency after they graduate
But after they graduate what happens is few of them actually got the job employers always use the excuse of "not enough experience" but actually they prefer whites to do the job
There is no reason why Chinese students can't study accounting or finance in China they are not high tech stem subjects

Click to expand...

Not that long ago one can give one's company books to five separate accountants and end up with 5 different financial statements which all could be creditable under the guidelines they are using. To reduce the incidence of this occurring, I believe a standard has been set to which most countries now use. Does anyone know if China uses this standard?

B.I.B. said:

Not that long ago one can give one's company books to five separate accountants and end up with 5 different financial statements which all could be creditable under the guidelines they are using. To reduce the incidence of this occurring, I believe a standard has been set to which most countries now use. Does anyone know if China uses this standard?

Click to expand...

China accounting standards is over 90% based upon International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) since 2006.

KYli said:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Click to expand...

horse said:

This is very surprising.

What is surprising to me, is there is no end game here. What comes next, for the anti-China people, is the same old lobbying.

After playing the China evil genocide card, there really are not many more explosive cards left to play, other than military invasion imminent card, which is not existent.

For example, the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment, which is a treaty between China and the EU. This is a done deal. It amalgamates all of the individual treaties of EU member states into one big treaty. For whatever reasons if the CAI is not passed, then China and some European nations like Germany, will cut their own improved investment treaty, bypassing the EU entirely.

I think China is in a no lose position with this.

What seems to be going on here, is the battle inside Europe, for what EU-China relations should be like.

China should make them eat it, the losing side this battle. I am pretty sure which side is going to win this debate in Europe. What we are seeing is not a movement, but a protesting vote at the changing of the guard. China should make them eat it.

How funny that will be.

Click to expand...

siegecrossbow said:

I expect more of European countries to make non-binding rulings. They want to look like human rights warriors but at the same time don’t want to upset China to the extent that trade relations suffer.

Click to expand...

Such cowardly act by both the Canadians and Netherlands. I mean if you really believe your own BS. Then put your money where your mouth is. And if you're really concerned with the welfare of the uyghurs then cut off all diplomatic and trade with China.

No. Alas, all they are doing us taking snidey shots hidding behind "non-binding" non-government approve. Etc BS.

This crappy mud slinging really must stop! The west is just so pitiful. Anything to make China look bad. It's smack of desperation.


More lying BS from the BBC. That SOB. John sudworth using China covid exercise footage as another example of big bad China being draconian.

This is a follow up to the video was posted last year. Interestingly, the article just posted by @KYli was highly negative and critical of the efforts made by the government. However, if you have time to see this whole video, it gives a much deeper insight. I don’t think anyone can call this propaganda. It is acknowledged here by CGTN itself that the announcement is basically a paper target, everyone knows it. So who is really producing the propaganda?