Miscellaneous News

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
Why waste energy with her when she will be booted soon enough when the Japanese economy implodes in the next few months. They are teetering on the edge of the abyss right now.

View attachment 165610View attachment 165611
Russia debt to GDP is 13.3% at end of 2024 which is big difference from 19.7%.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Russia's external debt-to-GDP ratio falls to a record low
Mon, 17 Nov 2025 14:49:02 +0300]
Moscow – Saba

Russia's external debt-to-GDP ratio fell to 14% in the third quarter of this year, an unprecedented low in recent history, according to calculations by the Russian news agency Sputnik, published on Monday.

Based on calculations using data from the Central Bank and the Russian Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat), the figure decreased by 0.7 percentage points during the quarter.

The debt-to-GDP ratio has only fallen once before, in the fourth quarter of 2024, when it reached its all-time low of 13.3%.
 

Xiongmao

Junior Member
Registered Member
Why waste energy with her when she will be booted soon enough when the Japanese economy implodes in the next few months. They are teetering on the edge of the abyss right now.

View attachment 165610View attachment 165611
Anybody with more economic knowledge please correct my thinking here. That bubble chart shows government debt levels, but what about government assets on the other side of the ledger? China's 130% debt must be seen in the light that that the Chinese state owns all of the 10 million sqkm land, about 50% of the enterprise value of Chinese industry, foreign reserves and all the hidden reserves that it has control over. Do the other governents in that chart have comparable assets? What would the net assets bubble chart look like?
 

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
The article you posted is talking specifically about external debt to gdp. Domestic debt isn’t included.
you can add it to Ministry of finance and still not reach 20% gdp and this ruble has appreciated while debt static.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Russia's national debt in 2025

The Ministry of Finance discloses current information on Russia's public debt; the latest data can be found at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. As of May 1, 2025, the Russian Federation's domestic public debt amounted to 24.99 trillion rubles, while its external debt amounted to $53.91 billion.
Moreover, according to the Central Bank's estimates [
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
], Russia's external debt as of April 1, 2025, amounted to USD 312.4 billion, having increased by USD 22.1 billion, or 7.6%, since the beginning of 2025. The indicator's dynamics were determined mainly by a positive revaluation of liabilities in other sectors, the regulator points out.
The difference in estimates is due to the fact that the Central Bank includes in its external debt not only the debt of government agencies, but also the debt of the Central Bank itself, as well as that of commercial banks, companies, individuals, and non-profit organizations. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Finance only considers the debt of government agencies in its external debt structure.
 

supersnoop

Colonel
Registered Member
Inaction also has consequences, and red lines keep getting pushed back by adversaries. Remember when China said 九二共识 was the red line, and was disregarded by Tsai Ingwen. Nothing happened.

"The Japanese comments are an unprecedented provocation, but they are still too minor to justify significant economic retaliation by China."

Disagree. This is just allowing adversaries to further chip away at China's credibility. If 台湾有事日本有事 said by a Japanese PM is still too minor, then...dunno what to say.

Also, I doubt other countries "care" about who's in the right and who's in the wrong. They cares about who is "mightier" in the literal sense of word. You show might, other countries will come around. What China is putting out now is a circus.
Remember when Taiwan still had control over their airspace and EEZ?

Tsai Ing Wen talked a good game, but essentially lost any territorial control they had. Due to low number of F-16Vs and age of Mirage-2000, ROCAF no longer conducts any intercepts.

Similarly, JASDF is in a similar situation. The only aircraft they have for interception is the F-15J, they are 40 years old and the age was considered a factor in a fatal 2022 crash.

Today there was a standoff at Diaoyu Islands. There is a dispute on how everything went down, but the hard reality is that Japan has difficulty patrolling the islands.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In June, Japan said it had observed Chinese vessels operating near the disputed islands for a record 216 consecutive days.

20 years ago, PLAN probably could not undertake this let alone the Coast Guard.
 

AntiDK

New Member
Registered Member

Taiwan opposition blocks US$40 billion defence budget, prompting protests from ruling DPP​

KMT and TPP say William Lai’s government is seeking a ‘blank cheque’ and demand details of procurement plans before proposal can be reviewed

kmtg.jpg

Taiwan’s opposition lawmakers have blocked a proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$40 billion) special defence budget from being placed on the agenda for review this week.

The suspension on Tuesday prompted angry protests from the ruling independence-leaning Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), injecting fresh uncertainty into Taiwanese leader William Lai Ching-te’s ambitious military modernisation plan.

The legislature’s procedure committee voted down Lai’s government’s request to schedule the bill for a plenary session on Friday after the main opposition party, the Kuomintang (KMT), and the smaller Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) joined forces to suspend its inclusion.

The move means the eight-year spending package – approved by the cabinet last week after initial consultations with the United States – cannot yet be forwarded to the relevant committees for review.

DPP lawmakers accused the opposition of helping Beijing by blocking a major air-defence investment at a time of mounting pressure from mainland China.

They surrounded the podium and shouted: “Taiwan needs security, not another Wu Sangui!”

Wu Sangui was a Ming dynasty (1368-1644) general who defected to the Manchus, allowing them to conquer Beijing. He is seen as a symbol of betrayal, which led to the downfall of the Ming dynasty and the founding of the Qing dynasty (1644-1911).

The KMT and TPP insisted Lai’s government was seeking a “blank cheque” and must first disclose full details of its procurement plans and strategic rationale.

The Lai administration proposed placing the NT$1.25 trillion special act on procurement for improving defence, resilience and asymmetric capabilities on Friday’s agenda. The bill would fund a suite of programmes from 2026 to 2033, including precision artillery, long-range missiles, drone systems, counter-drone platforms and advanced command-and-control technologies.

Opposition lawmakers argued that the cabinet had not explained what it intended to buy, how the funds would be used or how the new systems would integrate into Taiwan’s existing defence posture.

KMT caucus convenor Fu Kun-chi said Lai’s government was “asking the public to approve a massive defence budget without knowing what weapons are being purchased”.

He said the island’s leader must brief lawmakers before any vote could proceed.

“We support defending Taiwan,” Fu said. “But not extravagant or opaque arms deals, and not policies that risk turning Taiwan into the next Ukraine.”

Lai last week used an opinion piece in The Washington Post and a press conference in Taipei to unveil what he called a historic supplementary defence budget intended to “underscore our commitment to defending Taiwan’s democracy”.

TPP chairman Huang Kuo-chang said the Lai administration had been “completely non-transparent”, with details surfacing only through media reports.

Local media said the military and the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT), the de facto American embassy, were preparing nine letters of request to be submitted to Washington, including one for the procurement of a fourth Patriot PAC-3 air-defence unit equipped with the US Army’s Integrated Battle Command System (IBCS).

Taiwan’s nine existing Patriot battalions would also be upgraded to the US configuration as part of Lai’s plan to develop a “Taiwan Shield” or “T-Dome” – a multilayered air- and missile-defence network supported by artificial intelligence (AI) tools and strengthened command-and-control infrastructure.

Beijing sees Taiwan as part of China, to be reunited by force if necessary. It has ramped up pressure on Taiwan since Lai took office last year.

Most countries, including the US, its main international partner, do not recognise Taiwan as an independent state. However, Washington is opposed to any attempt to take the island by force and is legally bound to supply it with weapons to defend itself.

Taiwanese Defence Minister Wellington Koo Li-hsiung said on Monday that Taipei had already held initial consultations with the United States about the NT$1.2 trillion spending plan, though he declined to elaborate before the Pentagon formally notified the US Congress.

The sweeping budget has drawn criticism from opposition lawmakers, who argue that the process lacks transparency and that Taiwan is relying too heavily on US guidance.

KMT lawmaker Ma Wen-chun accused Lai’s government of allowing US officials to dictate procurement priorities.

“This is not cooperation; this is taking orders,” she said. “Taiwan’s defence needs should be determined by Taiwan. We cannot become a procurement window that buys whatever the US tells us to buy.”

She pointed to comments from Lieutenant General Huang Wen-chi, head of the defence ministry’s strategic planning department, who recently told lawmakers that Taiwan’s drone purchases were “all planned by the US according to Taiwan’s battlefield environment”.

KMT legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin also questioned why the government had yet to explain how locally developed missile systems would integrate with US platforms under the “Taiwan Shield”.

“There is still no answer,” she said. “Raising the budget is necessary, but it must have a limit.”

TPP chairman Huang said the AIT had approached his caucus a month ago to ask whether they supported the special budget for arms procurements, yet the government had disclosed “nothing at all”.

“How can anyone answer responsibly when we don’t even know how much the plan costs or what is being bought?” he said.

Military experts said the special budget marked a needed shift towards joint operations, but that Taiwan’s air-defence structure – a patchwork of US and indigenous systems – remained insufficiently integrated.

“Taiwan may possess many missiles but lacks unified command structures across high-, medium- and low-altitude layers,” said Ying-yu Lin, a professor of international relations and strategic studies at Tamkang University in New Taipei City.

However, Su Tzu-yun, a senior analyst at the government-funded Institute for National Defence and Security Research in Taipei, said Lai’s “Taiwan Shield” was designed to build an AI-enabled “T-Dome” linking all radars and firing units.

“It gives Taiwan far-seeing eyes and many hands – able to detect and engage every incoming threat,” he said.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

FUTURE GENERATIONS - TAIWAN NEEDS PROSPERITY, NOT ANOTHER LAI CHING-TE!
 
Last edited:

tokenanalyst

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
The PLAN modernisation of the last generation if not more has been primarily about gearing up to take the war to the Japanese homeland.

As I have said before, it was a forgone conclusion that Japan will directly fight alongside the Americans in any war over Taiwan. China has concluded that merely annihilating their expeditionary forces to take Taiwan won’t be enough at that point.

If Japan is involved in yet another war of aggression against China, then China will make sure it is their last, and will counterattack to eliminate the threat from Japan once and for all.

China isn’t so much as gearing up as it has already geared up and is only now tipping its hand as a final explicit warning to Japan that if they start this fight, then China will not be treating this like a limited war, but a full restart of WWII.
Well, in reality China has been building their military in the case they need to fight a war with the US, that alone means that everyone else come second or third. Anyone interfering it will get crushed. That is the reality.
 
Top