Miscellaneous News

P

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
AssassinsMace said:
Great Britain is the US's number one ally. So is a pro-US far right nationalist Argentinian for getting back the Falklands or letting the British have it? Now you know why the US wants everyone to be a democracy because those countries are easier to influence.
Click to expand...
how is Great Britain number one . Obama told them they will be at the back of que of trade deal if they did brexit and US not endorsed there person for Nato top job. There is also US support for northern Ireland protocol. infact Ireland has higher per capita GDP than Great Britain and US firms have big role in it.
US has great ability to transform countries that no one else have. Look at that Gulf Monarchies or some of US Asian allies. I can bet if Argentina show same competency as Mexico US will look more favorably at it. there is plenty of articles about near shoring to South America. These countries need to take the opportunity.
 
A

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
pmc said:
how is Great Britain number one . Obama told them they will be at the back of que of trade deal if they did brexit and US not endorsed there person for Nato top job. There is also US support for northern Ireland protocol. infact Ireland has higher per capita GDP than Great Britain and US firms have big role in it.
US has great ability to transform countries that no one else have. Look at that Gulf Monarchies or some of US Asian allies. I can bet if Argentina show same competency as Mexico US will look more favorably at it. there is plenty of articles about near shoring to South America. These countries need to take the opportunity.
Click to expand...
Not to mention the American position on the Falklands itself, Americans worded the NATO charter specifically to exclude it and other British overseas territories (while including France's). When Argentina invaded, the American response wasn't unconditional support for Britain, but they told them it was impossible to retake and to accept it for what it is.
 
james smith esq

james smith esq

Senior Member
Registered Member
Abominable said:
Plenty of Republican candidates say the racist part out loud, hasn't stopped them from becoming more popular. Against the right groups it is seen as a positive.

There are many reasons why the deep state hates Trump, if I were to guess the number one it that he is totally incompetent.
Click to expand...
1) Yes, they’ve been stuck on “The Southern Strategy“ for my whole life!

2) And would, on a capricious whim, advocate for policies that could undermine their plans! Policies, which, if they seemed to be gaining traction, would require them to “undermine” him!
 
A

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
AssassinsMace said:
Hence why the US wants everyone to be Christians also. The guy said he wanted to break relations with China because they were communists.
Click to expand...
Sir the Faith and the sword, a deadly combination now with the inclusion of democracy, a three pillar of colonialism had been formed, a solid foundation to stand on like that of an sacrificial urn.

Liding' Ritual Food Vessel with 'Taotie' Decor | Harvard Art Museums
 
james smith esq

james smith esq

Senior Member
Registered Member
ansy1968 said:
Sir the Faith and the sword, a deadly combination now with the inclusion of democracy, a three pillar of colonialism had been formed, a solid foundation to stand on like that of an sacrificial urn.

Liding' Ritual Food Vessel with 'Taotie' Decor | Harvard Art Museums' Ritual Food Vessel with 'Taotie' Decor | Harvard Art Museums
Click to expand...
Don’t leave out the market, the means by which uneven exchange was conducted.
Although, I think the faith component factors more into imperialism!
 
james smith esq

james smith esq

Senior Member
Registered Member
Abominable said:
Not to mention the American position on the Falklands itself, Americans worded the NATO charter specifically to exclude it and other British overseas territories (while including France's). When Argentina invaded, the American response wasn't unconditional support for Britain, but they told them it was impossible to retake and to accept it for what it is.
Click to expand...
But, they sure sided-with their NATO partner, and kicked their OAS partner to the curb, during the conflict!
 
A

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
james smith esq said:
Don’t leave out the market, the means by which uneven exchange was conducted.
Although, I think the faith component factors more into imperialism!
Click to expand...
That makes it more worrisome instead of a tripod it become a square, it will need a chainsaw to break it down and in this age a major upheaval is hard to do unless the American top dog is destroyed.

I'm seeing it, of the four pillars, three had shown serious crack that need major repair. Only the arm component is solid but if the 3 pillars gave way then its useless especially if the weight of the problem is to heavy to bear.
 
P

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
Abominable said:
Not to mention the American position on the Falklands itself, Americans worded the NATO charter specifically to exclude it and other British overseas territories (while including France's). When Argentina invaded, the American response wasn't unconditional support for Britain, but they told them it was impossible to retake and to accept it for what it is.
Click to expand...
This part permanently lowered the status of Europe. and i dont think France can stay in Africa even with neutral US.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
In response, the Eisenhower administration, concerned about dissociating the United States from European colonialism—especially in light of its strident condemnation of the Soviet intervention in Hungary the same week—as well as the possibility that the Soviets would intervene to assist Nasser, pressured Britain and France to accept a United Nations ceasefire on November 6. Moreover, the United States voted for U.N. resolutions publicly condemning the invasion and approving the creation of a U.N. peacekeeping force. Washington’s public censure of two of its most important allies temporarily soured relations with London and Paris and helped contribute to the resignation of British Prime Minister Anthony Eden in January 1957.
Click to expand...
 
james smith esq

james smith esq

Senior Member
Registered Member
pmc said:
This part permanently lowered the status of Europe. and i dont think France can stay in Africa even with neutral US.
Click to expand...
However, Eisenhower was simultaneously supporting French Colonialism is “Indo-China” and cooperating with British Colonial projects (Operation Ajax) in Iran.
So, don’t ever think that U. S. foreign policy is either not-duplicitous, or not pro-colonialist. In fact, the whole “democracy vs communism” (a false dichotomy) ploy, was a cover for colonialism vs independence.
 
P

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
james smith esq said:
However, Eisenhower was simultaneously supporting French Colonialism is “Indo-China” and cooperating with British Colonial projects (Operation Ajax) in Iran.
So, don’t ever think that U. S. foreign policy is either not-duplicitous, or not pro-colonialist. In fact, the whole “democracy vs communism” (a false dichotomy) ploy, was a cover for colonialism vs independence.
Click to expand...
The point i am making is if US find more useful allies it will support them. Even Arabs will support US colonialism in Africa and Indo China.
Iran and Turkiye are nobody the matters i am referring too. and you never know who is behind US policies toward Iran as Saudi American company have deals since 1930s. Arabs are dominant forces when it comes to religion and wealth. dont confuse Palestine/ Lebanese/Syrian Arabs with Arabs of Nejd and Hejaz.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top