Miscellaneous News

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
It is not as dramatic as the headline suggests but merely committee urging. Definitely more of a PR push to create illusion of international support for TW. It is still dangerous because it warps the public's mind .
The EU Parliament is basically a CIA-run operation now. Kinda ironic when you hear all the time how democratic the Parliament is...

Anyway, the real power comes from the member-states
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
I dont know why you guys keep bothering with Taiwan politics. Current Taiwanese Gov is a US puppet. Why would you expect a US puppet to take into account China's feelings?

Traitors are traitors, no need to bother with them. Eventually they will get what they deserve

@Overbom

Calm down. Just as you have your rights to post above. We have the rights to post about Taiwan. Taiwan is dear to us Chinese hearts, and if we feel we should post to keepbother members informed. That's our right. Please respect that.
Xiaoying, Xiaoying [Tsai Ing-wen]], you are not who you were twenty years ago. Twenty years ago, you kept saying that you were a Chinese and grew up studying Chinese books. Now you don't even want to say a word of Chinese.



It took her twenty years to go from being Chinese to being Japanese stooge.

Well it took her only two weeks going from:

We can defend Taiwan from China's "aggression" to please help us, we are defenceless.

Honestly, just how did our English Vegetable obtained her Phd?
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Look at the size of the population centres on any route.
I highly doubt even 2 high-speed trains could be supported on a section between Urumqi - Nur Sultan

Hence it's all still about freight movements.

So the land sections from Xinjiang are a useful diversification, but the transport volumes are very low in comparison to the seaports.
100,000 containers per month from Xinjiang works out as approximately 5 container ship loads.
The passenger part is probably not for now, but in the future. Just compare China in the 1980s with Central Asians today, in the near future, when economy boost, there will be increased demand. Even the population could increase in these centers, not necessarily because of birth but because of urbanization naturally following industrialization. Example, about half of Beijing's population is not Beijing residents today, the figure was even higher 5 years ago, but in the 1980s the figure is near zero.

The freight part. Even though you acknowledge the land route as useful, but you are still arguing in favor for seaport. I think you missed the key point. How would you transport goods manufactured in Urumqi to Almaty (for example)? Are you suggesting to go first to the nearest seaport in Tianjin 2500km (straight) away, then to Karachi port 10000km by sea, then through railroad for another 2500km? You are taking almost 5000km railroad plus 10000km sea route for 100,000 containers to travel instead of the same containers going about 900km on railroad to save money? The bottom line is that sea route is not cheap for inland countries.
 

Laviduce

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Seems like the US assets in the EU are working hard to turn EU against China.
This is a very dangerous game that these US agents/collaborators/ Quislings are playing. This could lead to a serious miscalculation on part of an emboldened and reckless Neocon/Neolib US that thinks it can just get away with its malign activities (e.g.: coups of aggression) in Europe and Asia.
 

Laviduce

Junior Member
Registered Member
Wow they are going to use the name "Taiwan".

US propaganda is unparalleled inside the EU. Dumb Europeans dont even realise that they are being played around.
The EU and many other European institutions have been infiltrated by de-facto US agents. It should surprise no one anymore that the EU and many European nations act as extension of the Neocon/Neolib US.
 
Top