military Shipbuilding in general and the question: carrier or not a carrier?


Bltizo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I make observations about the ship, and Tam every time try to say that is not a civilian ship.

Trouble is I haven't said that, only few hundred post ago : )
The fact that all those posts had to be sent into its own thread is a testament to how convoluted this discussion has become.


Let's make it clear for everyone -- do you believe the ship under construction at JNCX in Shanghai is an aircraft carrier, or do you think it is something else, like a civilian ship?
 

Anlsvrthng

Senior Member
Registered Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #52
Very low chance to see a civilian ship there , the support structure visible there only seen before on destroyers.
The shipyard capable to make civilian ships without the need of jigs.

That is more likely warship, and this size leave only the carriers as candidate, and with very low probability oversized Amphibious assault ship .

The whole civilian ship discussion was a straw man argument from Tam.
 

Intrepid

Captain
Let's make it clear for everyone -- do you believe the ship under construction at JNCX in Shanghai is an aircraft carrier, or do you think it is something else, like a civilian ship?
Interessting for me: who thinks, it is something else? To assess their judgement.
 

Anlsvrthng

Senior Member
Registered Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #54
The fact that all those posts had to be sent into its own thread is a testament to how convoluted this discussion has become.


Let's make it clear for everyone -- do you believe the ship under construction at JNCX in Shanghai is an aircraft carrier, or do you think it is something else, like a civilian ship?
And it is not a ship, it is dozen of short , half assembled modules of a big, 40m wide ship.
 

Bltizo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
And it is not a ship, it is dozen of short , half assembled modules of a big, 40m wide ship.
Don't try to be cute. The poor phrasing of your posts over the last few weeks is one of the main reasons for why all of those posts had to be moved into this thread in the first place.


If you do agree and believe it is a carrier then just say "I believe it is a carrier under construction". If you believe it is a civilian ship just say "I believe it is a civilian ship under construction".

You can't blame other people for misinterpreting your arguments when it's hard to make head or tails of what your actual position is.
 

Anlsvrthng

Senior Member
Registered Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #56
Don't try to be cute. The poor phrasing of your posts over the last few weeks is one of the main reasons for why all of those posts had to be moved into this thread in the first place.


If you do agree and believe it is a carrier then just say "I believe it is a carrier under construction". If you believe it is a civilian ship just say "I believe it is a civilian ship under construction".

You can't blame other people for misinterpreting your arguments when it's hard to make head or tails of what your actual position is.
At Least One
There are three men on a train. One of them is an economist and one of them is a logician and one of them is a mathematician. And they have just crossed the border into Scotland (I don't know why they are going to Scotland) and they see a brown cow standing in a field from the window of the train (and the cow is standing parallel to the train). And the economist says, 'Look, the cows in Scotland are brown.' And the logician says, 'No. There are cows in Scotland of which at least one is brown.' And the mathematician says, 'No. There is at least one cow in Scotland, of which one side appears to be brown.' And this is funny because economists are not real scientists and because logicians think more clearly, but mathematicians are best."
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

PiSigma

"the engineer"
Don't try to be cute. The poor phrasing of your posts over the last few weeks is one of the main reasons for why all of those posts had to be moved into this thread in the first place.


If you do agree and believe it is a carrier then just say "I believe it is a carrier under construction". If you believe it is a civilian ship just say "I believe it is a civilian ship under construction".

You can't blame other people for misinterpreting your arguments when it's hard to make head or tails of what your actual position is.
He doesn't have a position, this he is answering a question with a joke.

It is a carrier is my opinion
 

Bltizo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
It doesn't matter if you do not believe it is a carrier, however your posts on this last page and in the previous five pages are all over the place as to what your position is.

Seeing as questions were asked to you this entire discussion has arisen due to the inability of other people to pin down what your actual position is and your strange unwillingness to express your position, then c
onsider this a moderator warning for flirting with the rule of "do not make nonsensical claims or points".
 

Top