Ladakh Flash Point

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xizor

Captain
Registered Member
I hate to dissapoint you, but no notable international media outlets have media outlets have published tgose images. And despite your trolling, it is a fact that China retreated fron the la c in multiple locations. Those "irrelevant satellite images" show that quite clearly.
Hate to disappoint you but "mutual disengagement" was what you yourself were repeating so often few months back.

And in many locations, if you consider China as the advancer (encroacher) it'd mean the buffer zones are majorly in what was previously thought to be Indian controlled regions.

The multiple satellite images, if at all they show anything substantial in the rare cases, also show that clearly.
 

Xizor

Captain
Registered Member
By now it is clear you must be visually impaired, because you cannot even understand basic satellite imagery. You probably think Maxar, Sentinel, ESA, Google, etc. are all controlled by Indians lol. Whatever makes you feel better I guess
And what do these satellite imagery show? It's apparent that behind your attempts to somehow wrest out a narrative favorable to India, there is the fact that unilateral disengagement of China wasn't what that happened.

Any imagery to prove that? If not, then what exactly is your point? Isn't it India which is pushing for the disengagement talks?
And a China that refuses to fully disengage isn't what the weaker party would do.
 

jfy1155

Junior Member
Registered Member
.
I hate to dissapoint you, but no notable international media outlets have media outlets have published tgose images. And despite your trolling, it is a fact that China retreated fron the la c in multiple locations. Those "irrelevant satellite images" show that quite clearly.

Congratulations on no international media outlets reporting the embarrassing viral pictures and videos. Indians should feel safer now.
 

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
And what do these satellite imagery show? It's apparent that behind your attempts to somehow wrest out a narrative favorable to India, there is the fact that unilateral disengagement of China wasn't what that happened.
Mps
Any imagery to prove that? If not, then what exactly is your point? Isn't it India which is pushing for the disengagement talks?
And a China that refuses to fully disengage isn't what the weaker party would do.
When did I claim unilateral disengagement ocured? And what makes you think India pushed for unilateral disengagement?
Obviously it would be beneficial for India to remove many of the forward camps it set up in disputed areas it recently occupied. Bit this can only happen if full disengagrment AND deescalation is mutually carried out. General Naravane was quite clear about this.
 

FishWings

Junior Member
Registered Member
You communists enjoy this small win. You can not expect to win against full might of indian army armed with real weapons ;)
Which 'real weapons' exactly? The real rifles that PLA confiscated from surrendered IA soldiers? Or the BMP that flipped over and crushed that captain to a pulp? What about the helicopter that they crashed (again)? If not that, how about their helicopter which they shot down on their own after panicking in the face of PAF?

Please be more specific!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top