Ladakh Flash Point


ZeEa5KPul

Senior Member
Registered Member
If you actually knew how to read
I wouldn't make any jokes about reading if I were you:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
yoy would know the poster of that thread was comparing 2020 imagery with 2021
I don't waste my time with your silly hair-splitting, why would I care to go through some Twitter copium thread you linked? You have no point to make. I give your sophistry all the attention it merits: none.
But I guess it is easy to deny facts when they conflict with your narrative.
I have nowhere near the talent bhakts have for denying facts. That truly is on another level.
 

Xsizor

Captain
Registered Member
I hate to dissapoint you, but no notable international media outlets have media outlets have published tgose images. And despite your trolling, it is a fact that China retreated fron the la c in multiple locations. Those "irrelevant satellite images" show that quite clearly.
Hate to disappoint you but "mutual disengagement" was what you yourself were repeating so often few months back.

And in many locations, if you consider China as the advancer (encroacher) it'd mean the buffer zones are majorly in what was previously thought to be Indian controlled regions.

The multiple satellite images, if at all they show anything substantial in the rare cases, also show that clearly.
 

Xsizor

Captain
Registered Member
By now it is clear you must be visually impaired, because you cannot even understand basic satellite imagery. You probably think Maxar, Sentinel, ESA, Google, etc. are all controlled by Indians lol. Whatever makes you feel better I guess
And what do these satellite imagery show? It's apparent that behind your attempts to somehow wrest out a narrative favorable to India, there is the fact that unilateral disengagement of China wasn't what that happened.

Any imagery to prove that? If not, then what exactly is your point? Isn't it India which is pushing for the disengagement talks?
And a China that refuses to fully disengage isn't what the weaker party would do.
 

jfy1155

Junior Member
Registered Member
.
I hate to dissapoint you, but no notable international media outlets have media outlets have published tgose images. And despite your trolling, it is a fact that China retreated fron the la c in multiple locations. Those "irrelevant satellite images" show that quite clearly.

Congratulations on no international media outlets reporting the embarrassing viral pictures and videos. Indians should feel safer now.
 

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
And what do these satellite imagery show? It's apparent that behind your attempts to somehow wrest out a narrative favorable to India, there is the fact that unilateral disengagement of China wasn't what that happened.
Mps
Any imagery to prove that? If not, then what exactly is your point? Isn't it India which is pushing for the disengagement talks?
And a China that refuses to fully disengage isn't what the weaker party would do.
When did I claim unilateral disengagement ocured? And what makes you think India pushed for unilateral disengagement?
Obviously it would be beneficial for India to remove many of the forward camps it set up in disputed areas it recently occupied. Bit this can only happen if full disengagrment AND deescalation is mutually carried out. General Naravane was quite clear about this.
 

Top