Ladakh Flash Point

Status
Not open for further replies.

lgnxz

Junior Member
Registered Member
I apologize for posting evidence that runs contrary to the preferred narrative here.
Your best evidences are quotations from your retired generals lmao; this by itself is already a fallacy in the form of appealing to authority, nevermind the classic behavior of your kind's bollywood-like exaggeration as a form of copium overdose. To add insult to this, your next best argument are a bunch of sketchy satellite images that have been disproven months ago during the galwan discussion. What are the chance that this time, oh this time for sure right, that the indians after months getting battered both in the battlefield and on information warfare wouldn't lie again and bring something meaningful, right? RIGHT?

Oh nevermind, it's another repeat of parroting your retired generals and sketchy sat images. wowow very exciting and ground-breaking indeed.. :rolleyes:
 

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
Your best evidences are quotations from your retired generals lmao; this by itself is already a fallacy in the form of appealing to authority, nevermind the classic behavior of your kind's bollywood-like exaggeration as a form of copium overdose. To add insult to this, your next best argument are a bunch of sketchy satellite images that have been disproven months ago during the galwan discussion. What are the chance that this time, oh this time for sure right, that the indians after months getting battered both in the battlefield and on information warfare wouldn't lie again and bring something meaningful, right? RIGHT?

Oh nevermind, it's another repeat of parroting your retired generals and sketchy sat images. wowow very exciting and ground-breaking indeed.. :rolleyes:
So satellite imagery by third party sources like maxar and ESA isn't reliable, but claims by Indian media outlets like the Hindu and certain Indian "analysts" like Shukla are reliable because they happen to support the Chinese narrative, even though non Indian media contradicts them. Makes sense.


Keep taking copium, you'll need it since most third-party sources debunk your narrative.
Is chanakyaforum a neutral evidence?
It's better than anything else you've posted.
 

jfy1155

Junior Member
Registered Member
So satellite imagery by third party sources like maxar and ESA isn't reliable, but claims by Indian media outlets like the Hindu and certain Indian "analysts" like Shukla are reliable because they happen to support the Chinese narrative, even though non Indian media contradicts them. Makes sense.


Keep taking copium, you'll need it since most third-party sources debunk your narrative.

It's better than anything else you've posted.

So is this better?

"One outstanding account of bravery and valour is about a young Ghatak commando (name withheld). He despite all odd fought bravely and killed 12 Chinese soldiers, single-handedly. When four Chinese soldiers cornered him, he pushed all four, one by one off the cliff. While pushing them down, he slipped off the cliff. His fall was arrested by a boulder, gravely injuring him. However, the fall and the injuries didn’t deter him. He pulled himself back to the fight and started fighting with the Chinese again. When he got a chance, he snatched a barbed wired stick from a Chinese soldier. Thereafter there was no stopping him. He killed seven more Chinese with their own weapon of treachery. In the melee, the brave heart was stabbed from behind by a cowardly Chinese soldier. The grievously injured Ghatak swung around killing the attacker before making the supreme sacrifice."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

lgnxz

Junior Member
Registered Member
Yeah, the classic 'neutral' evidences according to indians: indian forums, words of retired indian generals, indian thinktankers, indian mass media, what else that I haven't named? :p

How about you ask your government to start posting their recorded videos on the situation on the ground like what we did multiple times already instead of relying on these "neutral" indian "evidences"? Or is it too hard to ask since apparently you can't even provide your soldiers with basic equipments for survivability and even stuff like this
Which is nothing but a bukhari mark 2.0 is lauded as a "military development"; I can imagine how a camera to record stuffs must feels like a distant alien technology to your soldiers given the comparison. If you can't bring these kind of hard evidences that normal human being can objectively accept, then just forget it with those neutral indian evidences™, ok?

Keep taking copium, you'll need it since most third-party sources debunk your narrative.
Nice projection, and kinda funny how you just straight away say the word copium to me like a kid who is just taught to parrot and learn a new word today. You actually seem eager to parrot a lot, from parroting your authority's word to word and now this. Is this merely your own trait or a typical trait shared across all indians?
 

lgnxz

Junior Member
Registered Member
Evidence from our side:
Meanwhile example of neutral evidences according to indians:
One outstanding account of bravery and valour is about a young Ghatak commando (name withheld). He despite all odd fought bravely and killed 12 Chinese soldiers, single-handedly. When four Chinese soldiers cornered him, he pushed all four, one by one off the cliff. While pushing them down, he slipped off the cliff. His fall was arrested by a boulder, gravely injuring him. However, the fall and the injuries didn’t deter him. He pulled himself back to the fight and started fighting with the Chinese again. When he got a chance, he snatched a barbed wired stick from a Chinese soldier. Thereafter there was no stopping him. He killed seven more Chinese with their own weapon of treachery. In the melee, the brave heart was stabbed from behind by a cowardly Chinese soldier. The grievously injured Ghatak swung around killing the attacker before making the supreme sacrifice
Very much glaring
 

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
So is this better?

"One outstanding account of bravery and valour is about a young Ghatak commando (name withheld). He despite all odd fought bravely and killed 12 Chinese soldiers, single-handedly. When four Chinese soldiers cornered him, he pushed all four, one by one off the cliff. While pushing them down, he slipped off the cliff. His fall was arrested by a boulder, gravely injuring him. However, the fall and the injuries didn’t deter him. He pulled himself back to the fight and started fighting with the Chinese again. When he got a chance, he snatched a barbed wired stick from a Chinese soldier. Thereafter there was no stopping him. He killed seven more Chinese with their own weapon of treachery. In the melee, the brave heart was stabbed from behind by a cowardly Chinese soldier. The grievously injured Ghatak swung around killing the attacker before making the supreme sacrifice."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Compared to some of the other stuff you have posted it is.
 

lgnxz

Junior Member
Registered Member
When we say that the indians are building a tent first and try to intrude into our territory, we don't need to rely on shitty satellite images or word of mouths as "evidences" like you. The PLA can just actually show it; after all, there's a saying that a picture is worth a thousand words.
tent.jpg
This is an easy to understand, undeniable proof. Something that you @twineedle and the rest of your kind could NEVER dream to achieve to backup your lying narrative. A good advice for when you need another beating in the future: ask your government to at least use their chinese phones like xiaomi that your kind love so much to record stuffs if they want people to believe their BS. None of these he said they said nonsense with the smell of typical indian exaggerations.
Compared to some of the other stuff you have posted it is.
Then you should stick to watching your bollywood movies instead of being a parasite in this site, there another good advice from me. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top