Ladakh Flash Point

Status
Not open for further replies.
T

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
ougoah said:
Which months did India occupy which peaks?

The only thing that really happened was some Indian troops crossed into China in Reqin (reported by both sides) and within two weeks they left. The entire time they were there, China was reporting on it and then after two weeks, China reported that the Indians were "expelled" out of China and stopped complaining about India intruding into what China regards as China proper (part of the 80%).

So kindly stop lying and exaggerating stuff.
Click to expand...
Do you have any sources for that? And where was I lying? The Indian Army's statements have always been consistent, at least with regard to Kailash.

Up until the February disengagement, the Chinese MEA had made it clear that India was occupying China's side of the LAC on Kailash Range. India refuted these allegations, and said it simply foiled China's attempts to cross the LAC. India occupied half at least half a dozen peaks China claimed for months and China couldn't do anything, and now you want people to believe China "evicted" India lol.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:
O

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
1624679641081.png

this is all India is good at. No Chinese bother with India but these Jai Hinds are a true strain on humanity. Constant trashtalking, spreading lies, trolling, counterproductive work. check the comment section of any Chinese article written in English. Pick one and look.

No wonder it is the toilet of the world. Too much empty trashtalking not enough real decency.
 
T

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
ougoah said:
Yes.

Also can you first back up your claim? the one you made first? About mighty India occupying China for months? LOL
Click to expand...
When did I say Indian army was occupying China? I simply said India occupied with China perceived was its territory.
The major peaks occupied on the South Bank were Thakung, gurung, Table Top, Magar, gurung, Mukhpari, Rezang La and Rechin La. Those were occupied until February. As per the Indian perception, they are within the Indian side of LAC. As per China's perception, they are on China's side. The Indian army specifically stated all the peaks occupied were on India's side of the LAC.
 
O

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Around the time where India's tactic involved capturing Chinese territory and southern disputed territory to improve India's bargaining position during talks.

There were about 5 or so English language articles from Chinese state mouthpieces complaining over the span of two weeks. Eventually they showed the photo of Chinese troops occupying the edge of LAC - Black Top and Helmet Top. There wouldn't be any Indian troops east of PLA positions after this. Prior to this, it is true that Indian troops went into China and were east of Black and Helmet Top for no one knows how long but no more than 2 weeks. PLA had to meet Indians here as well since India adopted this tactic but failed to secure or occupy anything for bargaining. That is abundantly clear otherwise there wouldn't then be visual evidence showing PLA presence and presence right on the LAC.
 
O

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
twineedle said:
When did I say Indian army was occupying China? I simply said India occupied with China perceived was its territory.
The major peaks occupied on the South Bank were Thakung, gurung, Table Top, Magar, gurung, Mukhpari, Rezang La and Rechin La. Those were occupied until February. As per the Indian perception, they are within the Indian side of LAC. As per China's perception, they are on China's side. The Indian army specifically stated all the peaks occupied were on India's side of the LAC.
Click to expand...

LOL but that goes without saying. Why twist your own position and words? India is currently occupying Chinese claimed territory just like China is occupying Indian claimed territory. So this was your "point" this whole time? It should have been clear that you're referring to the specific event of Indian intrusion into China proper (as claimed by Chinese state and Indian military and politicians as a gloating opportunity). Unfortunately for India that wasn't worthy of much because the Indians quickly left.
 
T

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
ougoah said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Around the time where India's tactic involved capturing Chinese territory and southern disputed territory to improve India's bargaining position during talks.

There were about 5 or so English language articles from Chinese state mouthpieces complaining over the span of two weeks. Eventually they showed the photo of Chinese troops occupying the edge of LAC - Black Top and Helmet Top. There wouldn't be any Indian troops east of PLA positions after this. Prior to this, it is true that Indian troops went into China and were east of Black and Helmet Top for no one knows how long but no more than 2 weeks. PLA had to meet Indians here as well since India adopted this tactic but failed to secure or occupy anything for bargaining. That is abundantly clear otherwise there wouldn't then be visual evidence showing PLA presence and presence right on the LAC.
Click to expand...
Did you read the India today Article I posted? The Indian Army never attempted to capture Black and Helmet Top. Nitin gokhale, who has difect sources from the Army, confirmed this immediately. India simply occupied the lower heights of black and Helmet to preempt China from crossing into Indian territory. This has been stated by the Indian Army multiple times.
 
T

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
ougoah said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Around the time where India's tactic involved capturing Chinese territory and southern disputed territory to improve India's bargaining position during talks.

There were about 5 or so English language articles from Chinese state mouthpieces complaining over the span of two weeks. Eventually they showed the photo of Chinese troops occupying the edge of LAC - Black Top and Helmet Top. There wouldn't be any Indian troops east of PLA positions after this. Prior to this, it is true that Indian troops went into China and were east of Black and Helmet Top for no one knows how long but no more than 2 weeks. PLA had to meet Indians here as well since India adopted this tactic but failed to secure or occupy anything for bargaining. That is abundantly clear otherwise there wouldn't then be visual evidence showing PLA presence and presence right on the LAC.
Click to expand...
Do you have any evidence for that? The Indian army itself debunked those claims. The Indian position was that India occupied the lower heights of Black and Helmet Top to prevent China from crossing into the Indian side. The "readjustments" occurred elsewhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top