Ladakh Flash Point

Status
Not open for further replies.

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
If there was no obvious military solution here and there isn't a more hidden agenda serving the CCP's strategic goals, then this is quite clearly a stupid blunder. There is definitely some agenda. We know the scrapping of article 370 and India's continuous antagonism before 2020 contributed to suggested motivations, but this isn't the complete picture. There is no need for military antics of this scale for diplomatic problems with diplomatic solutions. CCP has some grand plan or it's utterly hopeless and incompetent as well. How else could all this have ended up? Lol the predictability of the entire set of events proves if anything that the CCP has anticipated every step (because it's so easy in this case) and so it begs the question why.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Exactly! Read what you said here and it becomes obvious that the CCP may have blundered by making a move which it can't or won't finish. CCP doesn't seem like it should continue to reinforce this region with heavier than ideal military presence. It shouldn't be bogging itself down like this either for many considerations. But moving away only invites further intrusion and confidence from India. The CCP won't start the war either and so will not invade India to do what you mentioned and that's assuming it would be tolerated by the rest of the world. It won't. It'll certainly invite nuclear exchange which China may come out on top of with minimal damage given the tiny yields of Indian fission weapons and lack of long range delivery systems at the moment. Still definitely not the ideal outcome... in fact bottom of the pile.

It just seems to me that this unilateral move to capture India's claims and settle the border according to China's own understanding on it is just getting it into a geopolitical stalemate unless it's happy to continue putting new military presence in Tibet. Perhaps this is the actual goal along with further safeguarding BRI and CPEC. I can't think of any other realistic non-conspiratorial theories. Maybe war is the goal and this is the flirting/foreplay stage. Time will tell. Playing tit for tat fisticuffs with occasional outbreaks of shooting, like the LOC has suffered from for decades, is certainly not the desired outcome of this move.

You are falling for Indian fake news in thinking China is advancing to its claim line. The moves made so far are nowhere even close to the Chinese claim line.

PLA advances have largely been reactionary or tactically minded. A lot of the time the PLA evict Indians from a position they tried to seize and dig in to stop the Indians trying again/as punishment to teach them that trying to salami slice grab land will only mean they loose it; other times it is to take choke points to try to stop or limit Indian salami slicing infiltrations.

These are all extremely limited tactical moves made in response and/or to counter Indian attempts to change the status quo.

Yes, it’s not ideal that China has to surge troops and push back Indian samali slicing, but what is the alternative really?
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
Yes. The Indian troops have already started using their firearms. That is more than enough justification for PLA troops to go "weapons free". I was hoping that that 'head-shot' or 'drone strike' is indeed real. If its not, then its yet more pussyfooting around by China. India would certainly take this as a sign of weakness, and be emboldened to mess around further with the PLA. US and Russian troops threatened by hostile gunfire do not show such restraints. They would rain hell on their enemies for doing that. When Indian troops showed the PLA no respect by using their firearms to "chase them away", they must be given a fitting reply. Otherwise this Indian BS is going to drag on and potentially humiliate the PLA.

It's quite likely the PLA gave them a lethal response because the Indian government and its mouthpieces are rather passive now and did not brag or celebrate about chasing PLA away at all. They are only claiming they "thwarted" PLA attacks and PLA fired warning shots. Nothing about PLA being chased away or retreating. Thwarting attacks is a BS statement BTW unless they have a time machine. PLA marching into India and then getting turned away? Are they stupid (oh wait...)?! LOL Why would PLA march into India now without the intention of killing those who stand in their way? It's absolutely nonsensical when you consider the positions and history of this clash. PLA won what they came after. If they want more, they will be killing for it and they will certainly understand they need to kill for it because India of course won't be giving it away. So what thwarting?

I don't get if it's just really low intelligence people writing Indian propaganda but anyone with the capacity to think critically can see how moronic and ridiculous their lies are. They literally do not make any sense without some potent mental gymnastics.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
You are falling for Indian fake news in thinking China is advancing to its claim line. The moves made so far are nowhere even close to the Chinese claim line.

PLA advances have largely been reactionary or tactically minded. A lot of the time the PLA evict Indians from a position they tried to seize and dig in to stop the Indians trying again/as punishment to teach them that trying to salami slice grab land will only mean they loose it; other times it is to take choke points to try to stop or limit Indian salami slicing infiltrations.

These are all extremely limited tactical moves made in response and/or to counter Indian attempts to change the status quo.

Yes, it’s not ideal that China has to surge troops and push back Indian samali slicing, but what is the alternative really?

If this is the case then it is a completely different set of conditions and the situation can almost be interpreted as entirely Indian provocations and aggression as opposed to Chinese aggression justified as responses to Indian diplomatic aggression and threatening Chinese interests that run through Kashmir.

Just going to be a chronic problem then with no immediate end or solution in sight. Maybe India is under instruction or maybe it's doing this on its own volition.
 

Petrolicious88

Senior Member
Registered Member
India is repeating the 1962 path to war almost perfectly. We are going from tactical maneuvering, to fist fights, and now to gun fire.

The only difference now is that unlike 1962, India does not occupy large areas of Chinese territory, which prompted the Chinese counter attack then. But since India claims that these Chinese territories belong to them, it would be India's turn now to be the ones doing the "counter attack".

It looks like China has no more patience left with India. There has been too much one-sided Indian provocations on the military, economic, and diplomatic front. And now we have the 1st military gunfire directed at PLA troops since the last Sino-Vietnam skirmish. I don't know what is still holding China back at the moment. Is it because the CCP is still trying to playing nice, or Indian incompetence?

Things are almost certainly going to get worse from now on. I think that there is a deliberate approval from the top of Indian leadership for the military to get reckless with the Chinese. I think there is a good-cop, bad-cop routine going on here. Modi and the ministers would play the good-cop and pretend to ask for restrain and talks. But behind, they order the Indian military to bully the Chinese on the ground for concessions. Obviously, the Indian military is failing in their task miserably, so they now resort to gunfire.

India is overdue for a much deserved spanking by the PLA. Perhaps when India does turn this into a hot war. China would get the chance to showcase its true capabilities against a conventional adversary. This would mark the combat debut of the newly modernized PLA. And all those modern Chinese weapons could finally prove their worth in battle. Then China would no longer be labeled a paper tiger.
Yes, India is buying time. It provokes and then asks for meeting to cool things down. Then it deliberately provokes again.
Indian thinking can probably explained by this article:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This articles how many Indians believe they can surprise China with a strong strike that will cause PLA to have huge losses which will ultimately allow India to negotiate a solution in its favor. Even if China won tactically, if they take huge losses then it will be India which will be able to gain strategic victory.


My thought is: the current political climate in India is extremely nationalistic and jingoistic. Anyone following Indian media can see a trajectory where only military strength and toughness is glorified. It doesn't matter what losses India takes as long as they appear tough. There is a strong thinking that India have been soft in the past with Pakistan and China and muslims. Now India will not be soft and will go for bold moves under the new Modi govt. This is sort of the selling point of Modi and BJP that they will be tough while Congress have been soft.


I think there is a strong appetite for war in India right now. There is a strong appetite to prove its toughness and boldness. Indians don't care about losing right now as long as they appear tough and glorious. Case in point, the Balakot strike which was a net loss for India in every measure and humiliated India and really boosted Pakistan's prestige. But Indians did not care. They were happy that India did something to Pakistan regardless or the outcome. India is an angry and hungry nation right now. They think China will not go for all out war. And even if it does, India will somehow inflict huge losses on China to force them to back down.

I don't see a similar appetite in China. So, India will keep provoking China. They will always be bolder than China in the border fight. Verbal warnings will simply not work. Chinese exercises will not work since India thinks China does not have any interest in fighting a war with a "tough" and "bold" India.

So, what does China think about this matter? What does Xi Jinping think?

I really don't know. Xi Jinping has been extremely pragmatic and willing to swallow a lot of humiliations if it meant China could maximize its benefits and minimize its losses. Xi Jinping has also been systematic and bold in pursuing Chinese interests as well.

Considering that the new cold war is rising fast, he could decide that fighting a full-scale war will be a net loss for China. So, he could swallow a humiliation and negotiate a solution that is slightly more advantageous for India, thus, giving Modi the public win.

Alternatively, maybe he has had enough of Indian provocations regarding Kashmir and joining the Quad and many other provocatives moves by Modi and has taken a fundamental decision to teach India a lesson. The fact that India is sinking under Covid and economic slowdown is the perfect time to strike India heavily.

Whatever the decision was, it has already been made.

Maybe, there is a third way. Which is just simmering tensions and skirmish for many years. This is what happened between 1962-1980s between India and China. I think there is a strong chance we will see border firing and artillery firing similar to how it is in India-Pakistan border. This type of firing and tension could continue for many years.
India is buying time. It provokes then sue for peace. Then it provokes again. It wants to keep the border area hot and force China to deal with the SCS and the western border.
 

Mohsin77

Senior Member
Registered Member
It is quite clear now that India 100% does not want war and knows it will lose one.

It's also clear that China has zero real appetite for an actual war

I think Blue is true because Red is false. The Indian side does not want war precisely because it knows the PLA is ready and willing.

China would never have taken the moves it did, if it wasn't ready and willing for war. It cannot afford to get caught in a bluff here. That would be a strategic blunder, which would have jeopardized its entire Western sector strategy in the long-term (all along the border chain with India.) We know that China has been preparing for this for a long time, building massive infrastructure and flooding in forces to its new Theater Command. They can ramp up operations and reinforcements in a short time to get up to full-scale war if needed. This is exactly why India does not want to fight.

Here's another interesting question: Why did China choose the spring season to start this standoff? IMO, it was because if this thing started in August, India could claim that it was winter which stopped them from mobilizing and responding. However, India had ample time to respond in the summer. This shows that China dared India, and gave it the opportunity to hit back if it wanted to.

As for the question 'why is China willing to go to war,' I think that has been covered many times over the course of this thread. The answer to that question is why I think this is just beginning. India will be kept on the back-foot, strategically, for the foreseeable future. The pressure will keep increasing, until India capitulates and changes course, one way or another, the easy way or the hard way. I think Praveen Sawhney is right that this is the direction where this is headed in the long term.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
I think Blue is true because Red is false. The Indian side does not want war precisely because it knows the PLA is ready and willing.

The PLA would never have taken the moves it did, if it wasn't ready and willing for war. China cannot afford to get caught in a bluff here. That would be a strategic blunder, which would have jeopardized its entire Western sector strategy in the long-term (all along the border chain with India.) We know that China has been preparing for this for a long time, building massive infrastructure and flooding in forces to its new Theater Command. They can ramp up operations and reinforcements in a short time to get up to full-scale war if needed. This is exactly why India does not want to fight.

Here's another interesting question: Why did China choose the spring season to start this standoff? IMO, it was because if this thing started in August, India could claim that it was winter which stopped them from mobilizing and responding. However, India had ample time to respond in the summer. This shows that China dared India, and gave it the opportunity to hit back if it wanted to.

As for the question 'why is China willing to go to war,' I think that has been covered many times over the course of this thread. The answer to that question is why I think this is just beginning. India will be kept on the back-foot, strategically, for the foreseeable future. The pressure will keep increasing, until India capitulates and changes course, one way or another, the easy way or the hard way. I think Praveen Sawhney is right that this is the direction where this is headed in the long term.

I totally agree with all this and certainly thought this way EXCEPT for the fact that China itself has been offered the opportunity to start the war. It could even create false justifications if it wanted to. China knows India is incapable of fighting this war since it invited India to open it up... didn't even need to falsify reasons, all of them were handed to the Indian side on a silver platter. The Indians didn't bite.

So what is delaying China from going kinetic? This really destroys this theory and all the speculated motivations that come with it.

If one is to say that the idea is just to put pressure on India, then it seems to be unifying their resolve. If Modi weren't doing such a shit job overall, Indians would be putting even greater resources toward resisting China's pressure.
 

caudaceus

Senior Member
Registered Member
I totally agree with all this and certainly thought this way EXCEPT for the fact that China itself has been offered the opportunity to start the war. It could even create false justifications if it wanted to. China knows India is incapable of fighting this war since it invited India to open it up... didn't even need to falsify reasons, all of them were handed to the Indian side on a silver platter. The Indians didn't bite.

So what is delaying China from going kinetic? This really destroys this theory and all the speculated motivations that come with it.

If one is to say that the idea is just to put pressure on India, then it seems to be unifying their resolve. If Modi weren't doing such a shit job overall, Indians would be putting even greater resources toward resisting China's pressure.

Having said that, based on the situation until today what are your predictions of the end game if any?
 

SimaQian

Junior Member
Registered Member
We Chinese knows that, colonization and breaking a country is never our thing. Especially in a nuclear armed India. It looks bad on domestic audience and much worse on international audience. If China do that, expect nukes will be flying. In this case nobody wins.

We just have to live with it, just like what the Xiongnu and Mongol harassment to China over the centuries. Like it or not, China and India will still be neighbors for the next thousand years. We see the long term solution of the of the northern barbarians was the Great Wall. Obviously China cannot do that anymore in the southern border. There is no long term solution to this except short term fixes by swatting out the intruders.

The realistic way to approach this, is to develop strategies on how to minimize the cost in maintaining the border. The Chinese civilization is far more smarter now than the Great Wall builders. So maybe technology may lead the way to develop unmanned systems to help maintain the border.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top