Ladakh Flash Point

Status
Not open for further replies.
T

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
manqiangrexue said:
Whatever withdrawal was done was done to allow India to save face and learn its lesson. It's not a big deal because the PLA can be back there any day they want; who would stop them? We deny only that the withdrawal was due to Indian capability; it was due to Chinese mercy.

Cus as Kakyan said, Indian lives are expendable so Indian casualties and POWs don't matter. The Chinese don't say that about our soldiers.

Everything India loses is immediately irrelevant LOL

It's relevant because it puts the whole conflict into perspective. This is not some muddled disagreement between 2 neighbors who just cannot see each other's sides; everything here was caused by India's evil and cowardly intent.

We don't know that. Only Indians "know" that and repeat defeated points to preserve false dignity.

Awww, you're such a nice guy. Only like a really really nice guy would say this line twice in 2 posts back to back.

I don't think anyone's denying that China withdrew as much as they said they would. It's Indians who can't come to terms with the fact that being given back less land than China took doesn't count as status quo and that even that was given to them mercifully as they can get nothing from China by force.
Click to expand...
China retreated from finger 4 to behind finger 8, over 60 km. India withdrew back to the permanent base at finger 3, only a few hundred meters. Yes China took more land while retreating more lol. that definitely makes sense.
 
manqiangrexue

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
twineedle said:
China retreated from finger 4 to behind finger 8, over 60 km. India withdrew back to the permanent base at finger 3, only a few hundred meters. Yes China took more land while retreating more lol. that definitely makes sense.
Click to expand...
Argue with the other people on the details. You only repeat what's been disproven based on Indian claims which are always false. Your testimony has no value except to save face for India by calling its clear defeats irrelevant and obfuscate whatever else can be muddled. India has no victories except for those it invents to sooth its people.
 
coolieno99

coolieno99

Junior Member
Mt1701d said:
China already has a Great Wall... it’s called the Himalayas...
Click to expand...
This is the reason why India want Aksai Chin. It's just too difficult to march an invasion force thru the Himalayas to invade Tibet. Aksai Chin is a relative flat land located north of the Himalayas (actually north of the Karakorams, which itself is north of the Himalayas). Aksai Chin has no economic value and cannot support human habitations. It only has military value. Aksai Chin can serve as a staging area for a large, well-equipped army to invade Tibet. India already has a puppet government , the Dalai Lama, ready to be installed in a "Free Tibet" operation.
Why India want to invade and annex Tibet? Half of the India population is under the age of 26. There are 120 MILLION unemployed, jobless Indians. Each MONTH, 1 MILLION young Indians enter the job market seeking employment in a job market that has essentially zero opportunities. India need new land for its out-of-controlled rapidly growing population.
Look what happened to Sikkim. The Sikkimese are closely related to the Tibetans. The Indians claimed Sikkim was peacefully and willingly annexed. Who in the world would want to be annexed by a failed, chaotic, impoverished, backward, 3rd world country India??? After Indian "immigrants" had infiltrated Sikkim, the Sikkimese have become a minority in its own country. The King of Sikkim was exiled to U.S. and eventually died there. Jai Hind.
Tibet, and Aksai Chin has to be defended at all cost. China is not obligated to solve India's uncontrollable population growth problem.
 
quantumlight

quantumlight

Junior Member
Registered Member
coolieno99 said:
This is the reason why India want Aksai Chin. It's just too difficult to march an invasion force thru the Himalayas to invade Tibet. Aksai Chin is a relative flat land located north of the Himalayas (actually north of the Karakorams, which itself is north of the Himalayas). Aksai Chin has no economic value and cannot support human habitations. It only has military value. Aksai Chin can serve as a staging area for a large, well-equipped army to invade Tibet. India already has a puppet government , the Dalai Lama, ready to be installed in a "Free Tibet" operation.
Why India want to invade and annex Tibet? Half of the India population is under the age of 26. There are 120 MILLION unemployed, jobless Indians. Each MONTH, 1 MILLION young Indians enter the job market seeking employment in a job market that has essentially zero opportunities. India need new land for its out-of-controlled rapidly growing population.
Look what happened to Sikkim. The Sikkimese are closely related to the Tibetans. The Indians claimed Sikkim was peacefully and willingly annexed. Who in the world would want to be annexed by a failed, chaotic, impoverished, backward, 3rd world country India??? After Indian "immigrants" had infiltrated Sikkim, the Sikkimese have become a minority in its own country. The King of Sikkim was exiled to U.S. and eventually died there. Jai Hind.
Tibet, and Aksai Chin has to be defended at all cost. China is not obligated to solve India's uncontrollable population growth problem.
Click to expand...
India will not have our land.

 
plawolf

plawolf

Lieutenant General
quantumlight said:
India will not have our land.

Click to expand...
That’s a stupid fear mongering video, especially when it comes to rivers in India and the subcontinent.

Most of the water the feeds those rivers comes from monsoon rains, which gets triggered by the Himalayas forcing the clouds higher.

Even if China damned the rivers and cut off all water flow, it will not really after the major rivers downstream much if at all, because that’s not where the overwhelming majority of the water comes from.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top