Are they lying down or kneeling?
More like squattingAre they lying down or kneeling?
4.印軍涉渡過程隊形紊亂,各自手持盾牌棍棒行動,稱其為散兵遊勇實不為過。因為地面部隊徒手涉渡,必須在下游檢派深知水性者擔任安全戒護,以便在有人失足遭致溪流沖走時得以營救。涉渡人員應相互編組支持,必要時運用手中棍棒相互聯結支援,或是探索前進落足點。部隊徒步涉渡時,通常會先派出深黯水性者擔任試渡前哨,以便尋找最佳涉渡路線,並在率先到達彼岸後,擔任前哨警戒。觀察印軍士兵在涉渡過程中,以棍棒擊水生波,此等無謂嘻鬧之舉,就知印軍士兵基本涉渡程序都未經訓練,在與敵接觸戰況不利後,遁逃時溺斃於溪流,完全不令人意外。
When were Indians ever at f8? We ahve already debated about patrols, but it is clear that India had never built any permanent structure past FInger 3. THe only country that did was China. How can India retreat from land it never occupied? That is not how retreating works.
2. As for why media is allowed to "lie," that is how freedom of speech works. That is also why idiots like Ajai Shukla make up bs like 1000lm of land lost(which is hilariously quoted here) even though satellite imagery clearly disproves that.
By now you should know that claims are different than control. Both India and Pakistan claim each other's Kashmir, India claims Aksai Chin, and China claims Arunachal Pradesh. The reason why India never patrolled or occupied past finger 4 is becasue CHina effectively controlled it after 1962, creating the de facto lac that both sides agreed to observe in 1993. BTW, India still claims up to finger 8. You still have not provided evidence of India trying to violate the 1993 agreement.India claimed up to F8. This is a fact. During the past, IA soldiers patrolled up to F8.
If India never did any of this, why wouldn't India accept China's 1959 deal in the past? Which gives India at least up to F4 and more if they negotiated. India never accepted because it wanted up to F8. Your own claims mention everything up to F8.
It never occupied it like PLA did last year because it was disputed. China wouldn't allow India occupy it during dispute unless it accepted some deal to settle it for good.
By now you should know that claims are different than control. Both India and Pakistan claim each other's Kashmir, India claims Aksai Chin, and China claims Arunachal Pradesh. The reason why India never patrolled or occupied past finger 4 is becasue CHina effectively controlled it after 1962, creating the de facto lac that both sides agreed to observe in 1993. BTW, India still claims up to finger 8. You still have not provided evidence of India trying to violate the 1993 agreement.