Ladakh Flash Point


ougoah

Major
Registered Member
Chinese govt hiding soldiers deaths vs Indian govt releasing info as soon as they get.

But you will need IQ above 79 to understand this.

If Chinese govt was hiding PLA deaths why did they then release it right after the disengagement?

You need an IQ over 20 to understand this.

You need an IQ over 10 to understand that China was waiting because the info would have pushed Modi towards a classic Indian mob lynching and pushed Jai Hinds into war with China which would be such a waste of material for PLA.

How come Indian govt didn't release info that PLA controlled F8 to F4 for two to three months? Well reported even by India's own who know Modi was lying and something was up?
 

ougoah

Major
Registered Member
@lp1g

I know you have rupees to make through posting elsewhere but can you lift your game here? It's pathetic to all who read this dialogue. Do you have nothing more than cop-outs?

Quote each of my questions and respond with quality if you can... I know it's not possible because these questions break down your entire position but have a go so we can have a laugh.

Why do you say Chinese govt was hiding when the Chinese govt literally the following days of June fight reported that a violent clash happened? If it wanted to say 4 PLA dead then, they could have said it. If that's a lie there is no point waiting 8 months. They could have said 4 PLA lost the following week. You need a semi decent intelligence to understand these things now.

CCP claiming 4 PLA lost 8 months after fighting could have been done the next week. It's all the same and all as easy to be called out back then as it is now. Why doesn't anyone call it out since they know?? Can't answer it because the answer are obvious and embarrassing to India i.e. (or your low intelligence) withholding such a relatively small PLA loss for that long was to shelve nationalist sentiments until negotiations can be worked and finalised.
 

ougoah

Major
Registered Member
Why did CCP shelve all the headless chicken routine that India performed? Because 1. It's embarrassing to all intelligent and sane folks. 2. It doesn't improve or further its agenda in negotiations.

We observe the following facts.
  • PLA held F8 to F4 throughout the ordeal until agreements reached.
  • IA challenged but unable to remove PLA and tried taking Reqin (or Rechin La) parts on China's side in effort to gain some bargaining power. It failed. IA retreated to black top and helmet top base while PLA held hill tops.
  • China wanted this to be settled anywhere beyond F8 which is basically the same as its offers to India since 1959.
So with these in mind, how does announcing that during this violence which India kept saying was China's fault until some visual evidence suggests that India is no victim here, serve China in getting Indians to agree to China's deal? It doesn't. It pays to keep these sorts of specifics shelved until clearer paths emerge. As soon as agreements done, China revealed it and revealed much more than India has. At least China provided some evidence whereas India provided "according to anonymous alleged Indian military man". Please that really is so pathetic. Much more pathetic than even suggesting Mig-21 shot down an F-16 with zero evidence. Actually probably equal in caliber.
 

Nobonita Barua

Senior Member
Registered Member
Chinese were hiding 4 soldiers from last 8 months while Indian govt relased info next day.
Yea, india was hiding more dead soldiers in coffin after lying that only 3 dead, then forced to admit 20 died.

Chinese number remained exactly same.

Indians first died falling off cliff, then freezing in water, then by spike clubs being ambushed. Who knows how many times your each poor costume guy died.
 

Nobonita Barua

Senior Member
Registered Member
Come on! chimp brain is all they've got. In fact, seemingly not even that.
Never believe a word these apes say.
Remember this?
Another indian that day was citing GT because it was CPC mouth piece?

They can't confirm their own dead, but started to report Chinese fatalities as fast as they could.
First they said only 3.
Then it went upto 20.

These apes lie whenever they open mouth. :rolleyes::rolleyes:
 

ougoah

Major
Registered Member
How does India lose over 40 men to capture by PLA?! How badly does it have to lose in any engagement to result in 40! PLUS! men getting captured??

fake news and false bravado is India's specialty as Pakistan knows all too well.

This is false bravado and there are millions of these sorts of articles and posts.

1614080888864.png

Meanwhile real life... they lose over 20 men and somehow mysteriously get 40+ captured in June and a dozen or so captured in May. May photo teaser released ages ago. Funny how India's ALL EXCLUSIVELY cheap talk and lies but zero substance and evidence.


1.jpg


There is one image leaked from June clash aftermath as well. Non-gory. And a few gory ones of IA soldiers abandoned.
 

ougoah

Major
Registered Member
What I really don't understand is how India can have over 40 men captured (PLA leaks say over 100 but we don't take alleged military leakers seriously so we'll stick with the officially known 40+ men)

the first batch of returned IA alive and well you see? Would PLA return them alive and well if they allegedly killed 20+ PLA?? Yeah I don't think so either.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


even admitted to by India's own pathetic media. Can't deny it because there were dozen more captives to be returned in following days and week.

How does India lose every indicator of controlling the situation when it loses over 20 men which they would not even collect and try rescues for during the night and then lose so many to being captured? Not just June but also in May. How does it do that and find PLA mercy while it successfully allegedly "slaughtered" 40 to over 100 PLA? Yet could not provide a single shred of proof and would not officially declare this?

Why did India hide? Why was Modi so shamed and wouldn't even find the courage to say the word China?
 

Top