Ladakh Flash Point

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xizor

Captain
Registered Member
Are you denying you retreated ? Then again, denial of reality is a favorite pastime around here.
Explain your version of the reality rather than throw in blanket statements.

We can discuss about that reality. (Although I think there's nothing more to discuss considering the numerous posts prior).
 

Nobonita Barua

Senior Member
Registered Member
You have also been force to vacate your own territory, by your logic. ANd we are still holding your territory in Galwan, according toy your 1959 claim line.
According to whom? You? Lol.
You vacated entire Chinese perceived territory, including those you said undisputed, finger 3 to finger 4. You are half a kilometre away from your own territory by that logic after getting beaten black & blue. China enforced 1959 claim line even without sending any troops, lol. And China still holds the "occupied" land you lost in war.
 

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
According to whom? You? Lol.
You vacated entire Chinese perceived territory, including those you said undisputed, finger 3 to finger 4. You are half a kilometre away from your own territory by that logic after getting beaten black & blue. China enforced 1959 claim line even without sending any troops, lol. And China still holds the "occupied" land you lost in war.
Lol you have no idea where you own 1959 line is. Do some research before posting garbage online.
 

Xizor

Captain
Registered Member
Dated. Also, depending on which side is the aggressor, the result of the disengagement at Galwan means different.

Considering the evidences China has put up, It clearly shows an aggression from India being thwarted.

No need for me to explain since the evidence I have posted speaks for itself.
Yes you'd need to. Because others aren't blind here. Almost all of your assertions and claims, intended to merely troll if any, has been rebutted with evidences through multiple posts. It's here for all to see.
 
Last edited:

quantumlight

Junior Member
Registered Member
Hell no. That's why I favor maintaining stalemate at the border so continue to make India bleed internally.

There will eventually a payback for India for initiating the border conflict. Maybe 10 years from now.
In a Post Peak Oil world, one in which climate disasters will get worse, and all the low hanging fruit of easy resource extraction/refinement are gone, the rate limiting factor of global growth and productivity is no longer human labor, manpower, brains, talent etc.... We are reaching or have passed peak resource .... Its more and more people fighting for ever shrinking zerosum pie... fusion is still 4 decades away if ever, we are running out of time to utilize a new energy source. We have never left the oil age, everything even renewables still depend on oil infrastructure.

In this grand scheme of things, having a friendly and propserous India is NOT good for China nor the world... Look at India population, its demographics, its juxaposition to China border. Its in China's benefit to keep perpetual controlled conflict so India is always poor.. and if it has to seem like its losing a propaganda infowar to India in the short term to achieve a long term objective then so be it.

Those bickering about this finger or that finger are not touching the whole elephant
 

Nobonita Barua

Senior Member
Registered Member
ACtually, I have already provided interviews of an Indian Army Officer who actually served on Pangong andwent into detail about Indian patrolling ops. Unlike Shukla and Sawhney who never even sered in LAdakh. Then again, you are only listening to them becasue they share your views, yet you discount other far more respected Indian analysts like Nitin Gokhale, Snehesh Alex Philip, Major Manik Jolly, Manu Pubby, as well as non- Indian experts such as Nathan Ruser, Dr. M Taylor Fravel, and Jeff Smith. Then again, you are not interested in learning about the ground reality or what the status quo was actually like, you are interested in an echo chamber.

BTW, according to Sawhney, there should have been a cyber/slgorithim war in 2020. that date got pushed to 2024. He also claimed that China would never disengage from Galwan, which it did in July. So much for being "always right"
You mean you have reference of liars who got caught red handed after claiming they were unarmed, outnumbered, ambushed? Lol. I'm pretty sure he "served" well.
Why are you giving references of satellite pictures when we have coloured pictures?

Sawhney is right. China never disengaged from galwan, you begged for mercy after dying in scores there.

So much for not giving an inch & getting lost part back, lol
 

Xizor

Captain
Registered Member
Lol you have no idea where you own 1959 line is. Do some research before posting garbage online.
And you've got ideas about this " 1992" agreement line? You were insisting that China violated the 1992 agreement with India, yesterday.

China doesn't look at NASA and Google Maps to draw its borders, unlike India.
 

twineedle

Junior Member
Registered Member
You mean you have reference of liars who got caught red handed after claiming they were unarmed, outnumbered, ambushed? Lol. I'm pretty sure he "served" well.
Why are you giving references of satellite pictures when we have coloured pictures?

Sawhney is right. China never disengaged from galwan, you begged for mercy after dying in scores there.

So much for not giving an inch & getting lost part back, lol
Facts don't care about your feelings, and the satellite imagery by third-party sources is clear for all to see. Selective video clips does not change that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top