An opinion from York. Maybe he's basing it on some info, but it is an opinion to consider nonetheless.
He thinks the prior for the total number of J-20s produced should be reconsidered and revised downwards, and that it might not surpass 1000 airframes. The reasoning is simple: 6th gens are on the horizon, and it would probably be more cost-effective to shift resources to 6th gens and UADFs.
He thinks the prior for the total number of J-20s produced should be reconsidered and revised downwards, and that it might not surpass 1000 airframes. The reasoning is simple: 6th gens are on the horizon, and it would probably be more cost-effective to shift resources to 6th gens and UADFs.
