J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread VIII

Aval

Junior Member
Registered Member
No prototype bort numbers

By this logic is the J-XDS/50 already in production? Not necessarily even in LRIP, but at least beyond EMD?

To date, not a single J-XDS airframe has been seen with bort numbers. And we've had lots of good quality photos of its underside and even on the runway, and overall these include at least a version with a pitot and a second version without. We've also not seen any major external structural changes (apart from the aforementioned pitot) as a stark comparison with the J-36 prototypes.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
By this logic is the J-XDS/50 already in production? Not necessarily even in LRIP, but at least beyond EMD?

To date, not a single J-XDS airframe has been seen with bort numbers. And we've had lots of good quality photos of its underside and even on the runway, and overall these include at least a version with a pitot and a second version without. We've also not seen any major external structural changes (apart from the aforementioned pitot) as a stark comparison with the J-36 prototypes.
The J-50 may not follow the same procedure as the J-20. For one, one is SAC and the other is CAC. Second, the J-20 has been following the same procedure with numbering for prototypes vs none for production planes for a decade plus now. Third, there seems to be multiple J-20As without borts.
 

Tomboy

Captain
Registered Member
By this logic is the J-XDS/50 already in production? Not necessarily even in LRIP, but at least beyond EMD?

To date, not a single J-XDS airframe has been seen with bort numbers. And we've had lots of good quality photos of its underside and even on the runway, and overall these include at least a version with a pitot and a second version without. We've also not seen any major external structural changes (apart from the aforementioned pitot) as a stark comparison with the J-36 prototypes.
There's not enough photos of J-50 to say it doesn't have bort numbers. It could simple be on top of the airframe or somewhere else. Shenyang usually puts their serial on the vertical stabilizer for J-35s however J-50 doesn't have any so it could be anywhere and judging from J-35 they could also tiny in size.

Chengdu puts their serial on the side of the airframe and usually pretty large in font which is easily visible.
 

Aval

Junior Member
Registered Member
The J-50 may not follow the same procedure as the J-20. For one, one is SAC and the other is CAC. Second, the J-20 has been following the same procedure with numbering for prototypes vs none for production planes for a decade plus now. Third, there seems to be multiple J-20As without borts.
There's not enough photos of J-50 to say it doesn't have bort numbers. It could simple be on top of the airframe or somewhere else. Shenyang usually puts their serial on the vertical stabilizer for J-35s however J-50 doesn't have any so it could be anywhere and judging from J-35 they could also tiny in size.

Chengdu puts their serial on the side of the airframe and usually pretty large in font which is easily visible.

The FC-31 demonstrator and various J-35 prototypes (including J-35A at Zhuhai 2024 and J-35 reveal in 2025) have large font bort numbers on the side of the fuselage, towards the front near the intakes. I get that these aren't the serials for production variants (which for the J-35/A are on the vertical stabiliser), but we've got clear images of the underside and both sides of the J-XDS and there's not even a faint haze of any sort of numerical marking. Isn't this unusual?

I don't want to go too off-topic for the J-20 thread, so I'd like to make this my last comment here on this topic before I move to the J-XDS thread. I want to know others thoughts on this situation though.

EDIT: On further inspection, I realise that the J-XDS is uniquely difficult for bort numbers. Both SAC and CAC put bort numbers on front side of the fuselage and SAC additionally puts them on the vertical stabiliser. The J-XDS doesn't have vertical stabilsers, and the place where the bort would go on the fuselage is occupied by the still mysterious slightly-canted side bay panel with a bulge.
 

Wrought

Captain
Registered Member
The FC-31 demonstrator and various J-35 prototypes (including J-35A at Zhuhai 2024 and J-35 reveal in 2025) have large font bort numbers on the side of the fuselage, towards the front near the intakes. I get that these aren't the serials for production variants (which for the J-35/A are on the vertical stabiliser), but we've got clear images of the underside and both sides of the J-XDS and there's not even a faint haze of any sort of numerical marking. Isn't this unusual?

I don't want to go too off-topic for the J-20 thread, so I'd like to make this my last comment here on this topic before I move to the J-XDS thread. I want to know others thoughts on this situation though.

EDIT: On further inspection, I realise that the J-XDS is uniquely difficult for bort numbers. Both SAC and CAC put bort numbers on front side of the fuselage and SAC additionally puts them on the vertical stabiliser. The J-XDS doesn't have vertical stabilsers, and the place where the bort would go on the fuselage is occupied by the still mysterious slightly-canted side bay panel with a bulge.

Should be quite obvious that the context of a missing bort number for a mature airframe expected to begin mass production is very different from the context of a brand-new and obviously unfinished airframe which is many years away from that milestone.
 
Top