Honestly, 606, guys, I'm not greedy. Just do a tad bit better than or at least as good as your original goal of 175 kN and I'm good.
/s
/s
Yep, and that'll solve 90% our problems just because>90% J-20A aircraft will be with ws-15.It’s akin to J-11B first batch where they used AL-31. It is a transition phase so they can get the pilots up to speed with new capabilities.
That just seems like cope, truth is probably closer to WS-15 development ran into issues and is being further delayed for a unknown amount of time. PLAAF obviously wants WS-15 as hinted previously by people on Weibo and considering the alleged massive improvement I don't see why they would be so hesitant to switch if it is ready considering they had to retool the production and supply line for J-20A anyways.
Isn't it nice we can finally lay to rest those consternated worries from ancient Decembers long past.It is obvious that the WS-15 is not yet mature enough. Moreover, considering that engines will not play a decisive role in BVR air combat, it is reasonable to continue using an engine that has been proven reliable.
A quick, crappy comparison I whipped up based on one from @Deino. It's not perfectly to scale but it gives an idea as how the nozzles' lengths vary.Yeah it's noticeably longer than even the WS-10C2. But without close-ups or images of decent quality it's quite easy to be uncertain...
View attachment 166995
And hey, no prototype bort number.

Something tells me the WS-15 is easily put on J-20A still sporting the WS-10C2. No redesign required.A quick, crappy comparison I whipped up based on one from @Deino. It's not perfectly to scale but it gives an idea as how the nozzles' lengths vary.
View attachment 166996
Could just be subtle angle differences in the photos.view from below the j-20a´s intakes appears to be less pointed on the sides.