The only way i could think is to built some kind of extension on the deck edge elevator so the Rafale is sticking out as much as needed to clear the wings. Of course what this will do to the elevator balance is another matter, at a minimum they will need a beefed up lifting/lowering mechanism and motors.The Rafale M is listed at 11M wingspan.
The MiG-29K folded is just under 6 meters.
This is the MiG-29K folded on Vikrant's elevator.
View attachment 153401View attachment 153402
It'll be hilarious to see them jerry-rig a process to get the Rafale M with non-folding wings on that elevator -- designed specially by the Russians for the MiG-29k. LOL
Wooden pallet or Euro pallet. If you know, you knowThey can put some pallets under one of the wheels so the plane is tilted.
Brahmos, among other things coming from airspace control, is enabled by airpower. India doesn't have American/Chinese space asset power, and even those aren't omnipotent.Tbh, Brahmos is a bigger threat then IN carriers.
True but India has more efficient assets to launch Brahmos from Given Pakistan's geography, dont really even need the Naval assets for that tbh unless they wish to do it ar the area around Gwadar and pissing off the entire world by fucking around with global oil trade by attempting to blockade a seldom used port.Brahmos, among other things coming from airspace control, is enabled by airpower. India doesn't have American/Chinese space asset power, and even those aren't omnipotent.
Also, carriers employ rampages, kh-35s and, soon, brahmos-m.
Brahmos, in land attack role, is a somewhat expensive way to deliver 300ish warhead with reasonable (not point accurate) precision. It's a good weapon, and it's shown itself very well recently, but it is not a wonder weapon.True but India has more efficient assets to launch Brahmos from Given Pakistan's geography, dont really even need the Naval assets for that tbh unless they wish to do it ar the area around Gwadar and pissing off the entire world by fucking around with global oil trade by attempting to blockade a seldom used port.
This sounds they were more integrators than makers/builders, but they should have gained some experience while integrating these separate things right, prob should contribute knowledge to their next one. Although its been 10+ years so...idk if that experience is getting used anywhere right now.In fact, I'm not sure Indians designed any of the major systems on Vikrant. Radar, AD, engines, etc. were all sourced from overseas. Fincantari from Italy were involved in the base design of the ship. Their issues again is importing with little seeming control. Yes, that's how you end up with these silly issues. Why build a carrier with such restrictive elevators and no blast deflectors? Why design a new carrier where all the launch points are in the middle of the angled deck precluding any chance simultaneous launch and recovery?
The carriers are just showpieces, Rafales or not. India is unlikely to ever risk them in combat.This sounds they were more integrators than makers/builders, but they should have gained some experience while integrating these separate things right, prob should contribute knowledge to their next one. Although its been 10+ years so...idk if that experience is getting used anywhere right now.
Till Raf-M arrive and a new more efficient carrier design is made they are more glory/trophies to parade around vs a force multiplier, is that safe to say?
Indian navy Mig-29Ks carry Kh-35Us and Rampages.Bramhos can only be carried by Su-30. The Indian Navy's MiG-29s are nearly useless.
They did use them in both combat and left-of-launch situations in the past.The carriers are just showpieces, Rafales or not. India is unlikely to ever risk them in combat.