Hong-Kong Protests

plawolf said:

The riots were designed to force Chinese troops out onto the streets to repeat 1989, and the rioters were all supposed to die, live on TV.

The goal was to force the EU to pick sides against China, so that the US can steal EU strength to finally get China to cave.

China saw the trap and danger, and endured the unendurable, and now the US had a big problem with all the still living rioters wanting asylum.

Click to expand...

Wofie. As usual, you got the nail on the head. This is exactly the game plan all along. To bring the troops onto the streets of Hong Kong so the west can point their fingers once again as a "Tiananmen square" 2.0 (we already know Tiananmen 1.0 is not it portrait it as).

However, I thought it was great that China took the wind out of their sail when they send they did sent out the troops, but not with guns. With brooms and sweepers!

hashtagpls said:

Is that right?
Seeking asylum in the US Consulate can now be prosecuted under NSL?

Click to expand...

I'm not sure how the MSM gets interpreted in this instance. But I'm sure the act of claiming asylums from a foreign government itself can be interpreted as collision. (The fact he was unsuccessful in his attempt is irrelevant).

And least we forget. This 19 year old thug is not the sharpest tool in the tool box. He's 19, yet still in 6th grade. Normally 15 to 16 year olds. It can only mean one thing. He has been withheld (Not passing his exams) at least three times in his short education. Lol

hashtagpls said:

Is that right?
Seeking asylum in the US Consulate can now be prosecuted under NSL?

Click to expand...

Gatekeeper said:

Wofie. As usual, you got the nail on the head. This is exactly the game plan all along. To bring the troops onto the streets of Hong Kong so the west can point their fingers once again as a "Tiananmen square" 2.0 (we already know Tiananmen 1.0 is not it portrait it as).

However, I thought it was great that China took the wind out of their sail when they send they did sent out the troops, but not with guns. With brooms and sweepers!



I'm not sure how the MSM gets interpreted in this instance. But I'm sure the act of claiming asylums from a foreign government itself can be interpreted as collision. (The fact he was unsuccessful in his attempt is irrelevant).

And least we forget. This 19 year old thug is not the sharpest tool in the tool box. He's 19, yet still in 6th grade. Normally 15 to 16 year olds. It can only mean one thing. He has been withheld (Not passing his exams) at least three times in his short education. Lol

Click to expand...

IMO, it's not the asylum per se. It's those who went to the embassy are already known by the police as criminals, and going to embassy asking for asylum was seen as trying to run away.

Litebreeze said:

IMO, it's not the asylum per se. It's those who went to the embassy are already known by the police as criminals, and going to embassy asking for asylum was seen as trying to run away.

Click to expand...

Ordinary I would agree with you. But let's not forget that the NSL as promised is not retrospective. So the deeds of attacking the policemen and getting shot in the process is null and void in the grand scheme of things. So he would've got off scotch free if he just stay low.

Alas, no, don't forget he's got an IQ of an ambeoa. So he went in to the consulate which is post-NSL and therefore is guilty of this "new" crime. There just no helping these low lives.

Gatekeeper said:

@J20 RTS

View attachment 66874

Click to expand...

Normally, I don't like replying to my own post. But this caught.my eyes. I know it's not Hong Kong or the UK for that matter. So what is it doing here?

Well, it's because of these Hong Kongers are so delusional, they think they would be welcome with open arms. Well this video of a Asian girl's treatment in Germany should killed any illusion of the land of milk and honey. I know it's Germany, but it is very similar to the UK. Believe me.

localizer said:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

No country wants another country's trash.

Click to expand...

The irony is he thought his actions were going to impress the US. And the first thing an American would think is would he dare go after a policeman in the US and try take his gun to shoot him with it like he did in Hong Kong? He should've told the US that he wouldn't dare do this to a white person because they are his master. It scares Westerners to see someone they see as wimps and push-overs to become so violent when the violence is all about showing the West their passion at hating Chinese like they do thinking Americans will recognize that kinship. But in the end the US saw him as a foreign Chinese that thinks differently from an American that they wouldn't want to be around.

AssassinsMace said:

The irony is he thought his actions were going to impress the US. And the first thing an American would think is would he dare go after a policeman in the US and try take his gun to shoot him with it like he did in Hong Kong? He should've told the US that he wouldn't dare do this to a white person because they are his master. It scares Westerners to see someone they see as wimps and push-overs to become so violent when the violence is all about showing the West their passion at hating Chinese like they do thinking Americans will recognize that kinship. But in the end the US saw him as a foreign Chinese that thinks differently from an American that they wouldn't want to be around.

Click to expand...

I mean, it's just stupid to take these types of people into your country, they cause trouble everywhere they go.

Look at FLG causing trouble in the US, TW, HK with the pro-trump propaganda and other conspiracy theories, does the US think it's worth letting them in to use them against China? Taiwanese media got destroyed by FLG.


Even if the girl is hot, she ain't worth it if she crazy.

Tho FLG and HK terrorists are more of the ugly and crazy type

Gatekeeper said:

@J20 RTS

View attachment 66874

Click to expand...

I really enjoyed that Reuters article. Basically they took an article from 1996 and pressed Ctrl + F, and replaced 1996 with 2019.

That being said, it kind of also relies on the fact that no one will bother to do the math. They mention handover, but these people were just teenagers then! Their parents would have a bigger impact on their freedom than the big bad party!

Also, I really enjoy these articles. They always talk about no future, no freedom, but they never actually say HOW. There’s actually no evidence of this. They cite the NSL, but how has this actually been used? Is there great firewall in HK? No. Is there still Apple Daily? Yes. Are there still protests? Yes. So what has actually changed?

Finally, they rely on people simply ignoring what happened in 1997, mass exodus, followed by mass return. Either they couldn’t cut it overseas, or the opportunity in China is simply more lucrative. What will be different this time around?

Good luck to these people. I have an anecdote that I didn’t really get before, but I get it now that I’m older. Someone relayed to me that they were really ticked off once by a person telling them “How lucky they were to be in Canada”. Like they weren’t refugees, why are they “lucky”? They immigrated fairly to the rules on a merit based system, no luck involved. Like needing to beg to be accepted.

AssassinsMace said:

The irony is he thought his actions were going to impress the US. And the first thing an American would think is would he dare go after a policeman in the US and try take his gun to shoot him with it like he did in Hong Kong? He should've told the US that he wouldn't dare do this to a white person because they are his master. It scares Westerners to see someone they see as wimps and push-overs to become so violent when the violence is all about showing the West their passion at hating Chinese like they do thinking Americans will recognize that kinship. But in the end the US saw him as a foreign Chinese that thinks differently from an American that they wouldn't want to be around.

Click to expand...

Actually you are being to generous to the US and to him. As it's got nothing to do with him being crazy, therefore rejected his attempt at going to America.

It is much more simple than that. And that is, US has never seen any of these rioters as an indispensable asset. They have, and always will be expendable asset.

All the time they are causing havoc in Hong Kong, they are a good asset. But once they are caught or doing anything else other than casing havoc. Then they have turned into bad assets. Which needs to kept well clear off.

They don't get they name of condom for nothing

Gatekeeper said:

Normally, I don't like replying to my own post. But this caught.my eyes. I know it's not Hong Kong or the UK for that matter. So what is it doing here?

Well, it's because of these Hong Kongers are so delusional, they think they would be welcome with open arms. Well this video of a Asian girl's treatment in Germany should killed any illusion of the land of milk and honey. I know it's Germany, but it is very similar to the UK. Believe me.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1340411113125646342

Click to expand...

It's a strange video and some of those incidents looked staged. If she likes Germany why would she show Germans being rude and unpleasant? The human natural thing is to hate those that hate you. If you look in this forum you see some "Chinese" members always pointing to how everyone in the world hates China to say Chinese have to go out of their way to not get the world to hate China. They do that because for them when people show hatred for Chinese, they go into appeasement mode. They would start sucking up and not get angry. So because they do that, they think all Chinese will do the same thing to get Chinese to surrender to the West and do everything they want.

Gatekeeper said:

Actually you are being to generous to the US and to him. As it's got nothing to do with him being crazy, therefore rejected his attempt at going to America.

It is much more simple than that. And that is, US has never seen any of these rioters as an indispensable asset. They have, and always will be expendable asset.

All the time they are causing havoc in Hong Kong, they are a good asset. But once they are caught or doing anything else other than casing havoc. Then they have turned into bad assets. Which needs to kept well clear off.

They don't get they name of condom for nothing

Click to expand...

I see that. I was looking into the perspective that idiot who thinks the US will give him asylum. He thinks Americans will see him as kindred soul when all he is is a puppet doing their dirty work for them which says it all the more that they didn't give him asylum.