F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
The F-35C, without refueling, has longer legs than the Super Hornet. She has been designed to control up to three UCASS each...if our new administration will bring that program back to life (the X-47B was the prototype of that aircraft), and with the F-35Cs driving those very stealthy unmanned aircraft into Indian territory on stealthy Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (SEAD) missions on their front door while they then come in and deliver the big bertha weapons, they will perform exactly as you imagine...and more so. They can also take enemy aircraft on when necessary and have all of the sensors identified and spurressed while doing so.

Like I say, there are a lot of folks who love to hate these aircraft...but they are a lot more capable, a lot better, and will (as I have said) re-rwrite the book on naval warfare for the Charlie version, and the same will go for the Alpha (Air Force) and Bravo (Marines).

The ford carriers are going to enhance those capabilities and when we start doing upgrades to th Super Hornets and make them advanced Hornets (that upgrade can be done on all existing aircraft) it will enhance the entire air wing's capabilities.

...and I believe now we will have actual adult, steely eyed leaders who will have their generals, admirals, and war fighters figure out how best to use these assets...and then they themselves will have a whole new set of powerful tools in any "art of the deal" that they may find it necessary to apply.

I am glad to see it. Any American or true ally to America will be glad to see it happen over the next 8-16 years I hope.

Those F-35 Charlie's along with the Ford class will give those birds the long-legs they need, to be where they are needed within a matter of hours, that's the "secret sauce", in 10 hours you can move your airfield 300 nautical miles further inland, or 300 nautical miles further out of "harms way", you have serious option, and can pick the time and place of your engagement. The real reason China is building those military outposts on islands, almost like "static aircraft carriers"! smart, but likely to cause problems, but they knew that before they started?? they weren't counting on a Trump victory, a Hillary would have been as feckless and ineffective as Obama!
 
Last edited:
F-35-Red-Flag-1.jpg

F-35A Lightning IIs piloted by the 388th and 419th Fighter Wings prepare to depart Hill AFB, Utah, Jan. 20 for Nellis AFB, Nev., to participate in a Red Flag exercise. Red Flag is the U.S. Air Force’s premier air-to-air combat training exercise. This is the first deployment to Red Flag since the Air Force declared the jet combat ready in August 2016. (U.S. Air Force photo/R. Nial Bradshaw)
found inside
It looks like the controversial F-35 is holding its own at Red Flag exercise underway at Nellis AFB.
Well, after eight days “at war”, in spite of being “just”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
– the FOC is expected next year with Block 3F) the F-35A Lightning II is proving to be an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
during Red Flag 17-01, the Air Force’s premier air combat exercise held at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada: its ability to gather, fuse, and distribute more information than any other fighter in history provide the pilot with vital situational awareness that can be exploited to escape (and engage?) highly sophisticated and lethal enemy ground threats and interceptors.

Actually, the extent of the F-22 Raptors contribution to the above mentioned kill ratio is not clear: the F-35s are flying alongside Raptors and, as one might expect, the F-22s take care of the aggressors whilst the F-35s slip undetected through the surface-to-air defenses until it reaches the position to drop munitions at the target.

Considered that the F-22s are providing air cover to the Lightning IIs, is the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
a team result or the actual kill ratio of the F-35A?

There’s been much debate about the kill ratio of the F-35 made public after
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
).

“The first day we were here, we flew defensive counter-air and we didn’t lose a single friendly aircraft,” Lt. Col George Watkins, an F-35 pilot and 34th Fighter Squadron commander, said in a release. “That’s unheard of,” he added.

With the F-35A, pilots can gather and fuse data from a multitude of sources and use the jet’s advanced sensors to precisely pinpoint a threat. Then they can take it out with one 2,000 pounds bomb. It would be impossible for a fourth-generation aircraft to survive such a mission, according to Lt. Col. Dave DeAngelis, F-35 pilot and commander of the 419 Operations Group, Detachment 1.

As of last Thursday, Hill’s Airmen have generated 110 sorties (with 13 aircraft), including their first 10-jet F-35A sortie Jan. 30 and turned around and launched eight jets that afternoon. They have not lost a single sortie to a maintenance issue and have a 92 percent mission-capable rate, said 1st Lt. Devin Ferguson, assistant officer in charge of the 34th Aircraft Maintenance Unit. Legacy aircraft average 70 to 85 percent mission-capable, according to the U.S. Air Force.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
now noticed
F-35 to make Australian debut at Avalon
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

says "an hour ago":
The Lockheed Martin F-35 will make its Asia-Pacific air show debut at Air Show Australia at Avalon in late February.

Two F-35As will be flown from the USA, says the show organiser in a statement.

This marks the first time the F-35 will appear in Australia. The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) has taken delivery of two F-35As, which are part of the international F-35 training pool at Luke AFB in Arizona.

The RAAF is committed to buying 72 F-35As, and could take its acquisition up to 100 aircraft.

A source familiar with the F-35A’s debut says the aircraft’s appearance at the show was contingent upon securing air-to-air refuelling support for the ferry flight from the USA.

The Avalon air show will also see the public debut of the RAAF’s Boeing EA-18G electronic warfare aircraft, as well as several other recent acquisitions.

Held at Avalon International Airport near Melbourne, Airshow Australia will run from Tuesday 28 February to Sunday 5 March.
 
Saturday at 5:39 PM
... I'm wondering if quote unquote savings amount to 455m (Spicer Yesterday at 10:32 PM)? 600m (Trump Monday at 10:12 PM)? 724m (Yesterday at 11:01 PM and inside FlightGlobal right above)? EDIT more? LOL

let's wait and see
LOL! now I failed:
76*7.41+12*8.78+2*10.38 = 689.28
and it should've been 724 instead, considering

"Industry and Pentagon officials explained that this figure was derived by multiplying the unit price reductions of each variant from Lots 9 to 10 by the number of units of each variant purchased in Lot 10."
F-35 Prices Drop Again in Lot 10
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


and previous info about the number of respective aircraft in Lot 10 and (multiplied above by) declared cutback for respective aircraft between Lots 9 and 10

I'll wait for the Comptroller hahaha
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
"The DOD release also enumerated the number of jobs that result directly or indirectly from the F-35 program, asserting that it now generates 146,000 jobs, and will, at peak production in the 2020s, generate more than 260,000 jobs."

is this the new focus of the Pentagon?!
F-35 Prices Drop Again in Lot 10
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Doubtful LM have a total workforce of 112000 pers. and built many armament type ships also
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Looking it and i think interesting going for fuel qty, comsuption and range
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/j-20-5th-gen-fighter-thread-v.t7303/page-436
Something I had already thought
Yet
F-119 seems gridy
the F119 produces a maximum of 26,000 lb of thrust (dry) - that's 18,200 lb of fuel used per hour
for 2 : about 18 tons hour !!!

F-35 with F-135 i have 11 tons

And in addition F-22 is more big than F-35A and carry same qty of fuel curious ?

For to exact for size with wings etc... F-22 is much more large but for fuselage F-35 is big especialy behind the cockpit look pics
LM have do one airfcraft unusual the more big single-engine fighter bomber never build with a fat fuselage less nice in more small wings and very big engine also less agile than 5gen others fighters but have the more sophisticated electronic with sensor fusion F-22 have but less efficient still her radar is more powerful 2000 modules vs 1500 but don't have IRST F-35 have.

Ok F-15 also big carry less ( 6,1 t int ) but the 2 others are different comparable as stealth fighter used with a big qty of internal fuel and less often with FTs.

Not naysayer about F-22 very nice mainly capable fighter but curious for her max weight 38 t similar about with T-50, J-10 he carry clearly less fuel than others 10 and 11 tons a difference 20 % ofc USAF have many tankers for compensate it but curious...

F-22 et F-35.jpg
 
Last edited:

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
JSF pilot ensemble designed to keep out CB agents
By Kenji Thuloweit, 412th Test Wing Public Affairs / Published February 02, 2017



170110-F-LD740-098.JPG




Marine Corps Maj. Douglas Rosenstock, 461st Flight Test Squadron, is inspected by contractor Dr. Angela Theys during a chemical/biological pilot ensemble test Jan. 6. (U.S. Air Force photo by Brad White)

170106-F-LD740-002.JPG




Marine Corps Maj. Aaron Frey (center) prepares to board a Marine F-35B Joint Strike Fighter in a chemical/biological ensemble. All components of the CB ensemble are in addition to the pilot’s sleeved flight jacket and G suit. (U.S. Air Force photo by Brad White)

170106-F-LD740-024.JPG




Marine Corps Maj. Aaron Frey, 461st Flight Test Squadron, speaks with Jim Kristo, 461st FLTS, while seated in an F-35B Jan. 6 during tests of a chemical/biological pilot ensemble. (U.S. Air Force photo by Brad White)


EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. --
After several tests over the past six months to contaminate and decontaminate an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter with simulated chemical and biological agents, the 461st Flight Test Squadron has now moved forward to testing a suit ensemble designed to protect the pilot from those threats.

“Over a decade of planning, flight equipment and decontamination system design and build-up testing have led to this single flight test event,” said Darren Cole, 461st FLTS Human Systems Integration lead.

The chemical/biological ensemble consists of a special CB suit, a Joint Service Aircrew Mask used for the F-35, a pilot-mounted CB air filter, CB socks and gloves double taped at the wrists. The ensemble also features a filtered air blower that protects the pilot from CB contamination while walking to the jet. It provides both breathing air and demist air, which goes to the pilot’s mask and goggles. All components of the CB ensemble are in addition to the pilot’s sleeved flight jacket and G suit.

“Among the data we’re collecting is how much thermal stress is added to the pilot with the CB ensemble on and the impact the additional gear may have on flying the aircraft,” Cole said.

The ensemble also includes a communication device so the pilot can speak to people while wearing the ensemble with helmet and mask.

“It is a conversational communication unit, which is a box that integrates with the communication system so that when he speaks into his mask it lets people hear the pilot talk… it makes him sound like Darth Vader.”

For the CB ensemble tests, an F-35B is on loan from Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona. Marine Corps test pilots Maj. Aaron Frey and Maj. Douglas Rosenstock from the 461st FLTS donned the CB ensemble for the first tests Jan. 6.

“The first pilot stepped to a clean jet in the CB ensemble and we contaminated it using a simulated agent. The engine run pulls in the simulant so we need to make sure the air is filtered before it gets to the pilot. First, the air goes through the [On-Board Oxygen Generation System] and then the pilot-mounted CB filter to remove any remaining contaminants. There is another filtered air supply blower that provides cooling and demist air to the pilot’s hood and goggles. We also used three air sampling devices to be sure all the air provided to the pilot was clean.”

The simulant sent into the jet’s air intakes is made of elements that have been researched and tested to be safe, but mimic the properties of the harmful agents.

After the ground test, a second pilot came out to simulate stepping to a “dirty jet.” He conducted an engine startup and then took off on a flight. Both pilots wore passive absorption devices on their bodies that the simulated contaminant would stick to if it made it through the CB ensemble. Data was taken from both pilots to see if anything was different from the separate startup scenarios.

“We purposely chose the Marine [short takeoff, vertical landing] version of the F-35 because the equipment is more complicated and basically has more nooks and crannies for the contaminant to hide in. This aircraft also has full-up mission systems. These tests will demonstrate that the U.S. and partner nations can fly, fight, and win in a CB threat environment and then quickly decontaminate the aircraft and return it to normal operation.”

Cole added that this has been the only time this suit has been flown in this configuration on the JSF and is the first ever simulated contaminated aircraft flown for this kind of data collection.

As with all F-35 tests conducted at Edwards, the data will be sent to the F-35 Joint Program Office so procedures can be documented and distributed to F-35 operators in the future so they know what to do while in a chemical or biological threat environment.

“We’ve established the procedures to step to the aircraft and hook into it and the order of powering on systems to get the filtered air supply to the pilot,” said Lauren Gilmore, 461st FLTS, flight test engineer. “We’ve developed procedures on who needs to help the pilot; how many people are needed to support the logistics trail; how many people are needed to help the pilot don the equipment and how many people will be needed in the Life Support unit. We’ve also noted how many Airmen may be needed to escort the pilot out to the aircraft and recover the aircraft. We helped a lot with the F-35 concept of operations.”

The 461st FLTS will have the F-35B from MCAS Yuma through the end of February for the tests.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Big excercise you can see numbers of opponents mentioned

Red Flag proves ‘intense’ for F-35A pilots

Red Flag 17-1 is living up to its reputation as a grueling and rigorous test of fighter pilot skills, according to Hill Air Force Base F-35A pilots participating in the premier air-to-air combat exercise at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., from Jan. 23 to Feb. 10.

The three-week exercise has friendly ‘Blue Force’ taking on enemy ‘Red Force’ aggressors in both live and mock training environments to test air-to-air, air-to-ground, and space and cyber warfare during both day and nighttime missions.

Each operation begins with a lengthy and intensive preflight planning session where Blue Force pilots meet with cyberspace, special forces, space technology experts, and allied counterparts to shape what they hope to be winning game plans and tactics.

“Most of the work takes place before we get in the air, and it’s in these planning sessions where mission success actually begins,” said Lt. Col. Dave DeAngelis, Reserve F-35A pilot and commander of the 419th Operations Group, detachment 1.

“When we’re flying the actual mission, White Force [the Red Flag planning team] will then change things up to fully test our ability to respond to the unexpected, just like in real combat,” DeAngelis said.

At any given time, Blue Force may have up to 60 aircraft fighting to take on Red Force aggressors that come in waves of 8-16 aircraft at a time. Additional enemy aggressor aircraft are added to the fight each time Blue Force shoots down a Red Force jet. In total, Blue Force may face as many as 50 total enemy aircraft during a mission.

“It’s intense participating in an exercise of this magnitude,” said Maj. Jayson Rickard, a Reserve F-35A pilot with the 466th Fighter Squadron. Rickard was handpicked to serve as the first F-35A mission commander at Red Flag and said the exercise offers exceptional preparation for a future air-to-air “shooting war.”

F-35A pilots have unique challenges given the massive amount of information provided to them via the aircraft’s sophisticated data-gathering capability.

“The F-35A’s sensors and ability to build the battlespace picture is amazing, but with the number of friendly aircraft, enemy aircraft, and surface-to-air threats at this Red Flag, it's a lot of information to process,” said Maj. James Schmidt, an active-duty F-35A pilot with the 34th Fighter Squadron. “Thankfully, the F-35A’s ability to show us where the friendly assets are, where the enemies are, and know that they can't see us gives it the lethal advantage to locate threats and targets deep in enemy territory.”

Following each mission, everyone involved participates in an extensive debrief session, which can last six hours or more, to dissect every detail of the mission, reviewing what went right and what went wrong.

“The real learning begins during debrief. The whole goal is to not make the same mistake twice and ensure lessons learned on any failures are corrected for the next mission,” Schmidt said. “This is especially valuable to the F-35A community as we continue to build our tactics and understand how we fit into the bigger picture of fifth- and fourth-generation assets. Then the cycle begins again, starting with solid planning the next day.”

About 2,300 personnel and 129 aircraft, to include allied partners from Britain and Australia, are participating in Red Flag 17-1.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
understandably Top Marine Corps aviator wants F-35Bs faster than planned
The Marine Corps’ top aviator is hungry for more F-35Bs, telling reporters on Wednesday that he would like to see the service’s buy rate increase to 37 jets per year.

That would almost double the planned rate of F-35B procurement over the next few years, which is projected to sit at 20 aircraft per year from fiscal years 2018 to 2021.

"We have the infrastructure in place,” said Lt. Gen. Jon Davis, deputy commandant for aviation. "Bottom line is we've had a very anemic ramp, so we've been holding onto the older airplanes longer. If asked by the American people to get the airplanes faster, I guarantee we'd put them into play very, very quickly.

“We'd transition squadrons faster is what we'd do,” he said, adding that if the service were allowed to purchase 37 B-variants a year, it would be able to retire its legacy F/A-18 Hornet and Harrier planes by 2026.

The Marine Corps currently owns about 50 F-35Bs in test, training and operations squadrons, and is gradually making the shift from Hornets and Harriers to F-35s, Davis said. In January, it relocated 10 F-35Bs from Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 121 from Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Yuma, Arizona to MCAS Iwakuni, Japan — marking the first international deployment of the short-takeoff-and-vertical-landing version.

Next up, a Hornet squadron — VMFA 122 from MCAS Beaufort, South Carolina — will transition to an F-35B squadron based at MCAS Yuma. Following that, another F-18 squadron, VMFA 314, will become the Marine Corps’ first F-35C squadron.

Davis’ comments on the F-35 echo a similar debate in the Air Force about the optimal pace of joint strike fighter purchases, and how demand for the fifth-generation fighter can be balanced with other priorities. Last summer, Air Force Gen. Herbert “Hawk” Carlisle, the outgoing head of Air Combat Command, told reporters that he would like to see yearly F-35A procurement by the Air Force increase to 60 planes as quickly as possible. Currently, the service is set to buy about 40 planes per year until 2021.

At a breakfast event Tuesday, the Air Force chief of staff said that he would like to see faster F-35 acquisition, but questioned whether it would be the service’s top budget priority.

“The more F-35s that we could actually procure in the shortest period of time to be able to reduce the aircraft age and be able to get more heavily into the fifth-generation business is clearly a priority,” Gen. David Goldfein said. “Is it the number one place that I would spend dollars? That’s going to be a department-level discussion.”
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top