Discussing Biden's Potential China Policy

  • Thread starter Deleted member 15887
  • Start date
S

spring2017

New Member
Registered Member
hashtagpls said:
I'm of the opinion that such a war must and should be a war of conquest
Click to expand...
War of conquest? Then what's the difference between you and those you called "white anglo"?

Any war of conquest must be resolutely opposed by the people of China, Asia and the World. No to mention it is delusional to think that such a war can be won, but that's besides the point.
 
hashtagpls

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
spring2017 said:
War of conquest? Then what's the difference between you and those you called "white anglo"?

Any war of conquest must be resolutely opposed by the people of China, Asia and the World. No to mention it is delusional to think that such a war can be won, but that's besides the point.
Click to expand...
The Xiongnu were an existential threat to the Han Dynasty, as was Carthage to Rome. Similarly, the Anglo must be weakened sufficiently so as to guarantee peace not just in east Asia but also around the world. This is realpolitik.

Confiscating Australia, NZ and Hawaii and Alaska would deprive the anglos of strategic depth and launchpads to invade China.
 
j17wang

j17wang

Senior Member
Registered Member
hashtagpls said:
I'm of the opinion that such a war must and should be a war of conquest; if chinese lives must be lost for the defence of China, then the price for such losses ought to be:
1) The Pacific becomes a Chinese lake.
2) Australia and NZ, Hawaii and Alaska and all the islands in between becomes Chinese territory and must become sinocised.

Such a war would only be the first of perhaps three "punic wars" that must expel white anglo influence from this hemisphere
Click to expand...

No, China is be a moral nation, we must do better. Australia, NZ, Hawaii, and Alaska will be completely restored to its original demographic composition, not 90%, or 99%...but all the way 100%.
 
hashtagpls

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
j17wang said:
No, China is be a moral nation, we must do better. Australia, NZ, Hawaii, and Alaska will be completely restored to its original demographic composition, not 90%, or 99%...but all the way 100%.
Click to expand...
There're precious little inuit or native America or aboriginal population on those stolen lands; in fact, many such self proclaimed natives have white skin and light eyes, passing for anglo as was the intention of the genociders.

I don't doubt for a moment that the anglos would do the same to us; read up on matt pottinger and what he wanted for China. Basically, Pottinger wanted to do a "Morgenthau Plan" for China ie mass de-industrialisation save a few Treaty Ports where the whites could pillage China at will.

The only peace saving solution is to deprive these anglos of the means to pursue such aims.
 
Bellum_Romanum

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
hashtagpls said:
There're precious little inuit or native America or aboriginal population on those stolen lands; in fact, many such self proclaimed natives have white skin and light eyes, passing for anglo as was the intention of the genociders.

I don't doubt for a moment that the anglos would do the same to us; read up on matt pottinger and what he wanted for China. Basically, Pottinger wanted to do a "Morgenthau Plan" for China ie mass de-industrialisation save a few Treaty Ports where the whites could pillage China at will.

The only peace saving solution is to deprive these anglos of the means to pursue such aims.
Click to expand...
Where can I read that C.I.A. plant pretended to be a WSJ reporter when all along I suspect that he followed on his mom's footsteps of working for the C.I.A. a.k.a. Gloria Steinem? Or whatever that hippies last name was.
 
solarz

solarz

Brigadier
hashtagpls said:
The Xiongnu were an existential threat to the Han Dynasty, as was Carthage to Rome. Similarly, the Anglo must be weakened sufficiently so as to guarantee peace not just in east Asia but also around the world. This is realpolitik.

Confiscating Australia, NZ and Hawaii and Alaska would deprive the anglos of strategic depth and launchpads to invade China.
Click to expand...

Learn some real history before spouting your nonsense here.

Han Wudi's victory over the Xiongnu was an inflection point for the Han dynasty. It set the dynasty on a path of decline and ultimately collapse.
 
hashtagpls

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
Bellum_Romanum said:
Where can I read that C.I.A. plant pretended to be a WSJ reporter when all along I suspect that he followed on his mom's footsteps of working for the C.I.A. a.k.a. Gloria Steinem? Or whatever that hippies last name was.
Click to expand...
Sources are from Carl Zha podcasts with The Daily Mao.
solarz said:
Learn some real history before spouting your nonsense here.

Han Wudi's victory over the Xiongnu was an inflection point for the Han dynasty. It set the dynasty on a path of decline and ultimately collapse.
Click to expand...
Nonetheless, the Rome-Carthage analogy fits.
 
solarz

solarz

Brigadier
hashtagpls said:
Sources are from Carl Zha podcasts with The Daily Mao.

Nonetheless, the Rome-Carthage analogy fits.
Click to expand...

Which one is China in your analogy? Rome or Carthage? Are you proposing China wipe the US out and salt its ground, or are you proposing China should conduct a series of Hannibal-like campaigns in an ultimately self-defeating strategy?

If you want to use historical analogies, a far more apt period to look at would be the Spring and Autumn period, where multiple states were competing for hegemony.
 
hashtagpls

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
solarz said:
Which one is China in your analogy? Rome or Carthage? Are you proposing China wipe the US out and salt its ground, or are you proposing China should conduct a series of Hannibal-like campaigns in an ultimately self-defeating strategy?

If you want to use historical analogies, a far more apt period to look at would be the Spring and Autumn period, where multiple states were competing for hegemony.
Click to expand...
China would be Rome of course, and even when Carthage was conquered, it was still reused by the Romans as a thriving city; the location was simply too good to salt and leave to ruin.

Similarly, the continents of the Anglos: namely Australia and if able, north america are prime real estate; an extra 1.4 bin Chinese could settle those lands even at the expense of the anglos squatting there.

A war would be a waste of life if not for the acquisition of land and territory to be held in perpetuity.
 
hashtagpls

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
As an addendum, if anyone has any doubts as to the intentions of the anglos, have a read of this:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

tl;dr Anglo australians advocated bio-warfare against south east asians- around the same time anglo americans were using bioweapons against Chinese in korea.

Depriving the anglos of the choice lands which they squat on is a more humane outcome compared to the genocide and extermination they have so often employed in the past.

In fact, given the historical sentiment and MO of the anglos, it does give credence to the theory that COVID-19 was an anglo devised bioweapon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top