Coronavirus 2019-2020 thread (no unsubstantiated rumours!)

[Dolcevita]

View attachment 67932

Oh boy, oh boy. I was trying to find an example, and Gordon Chang came to the rescue.

If Gordon Chang is so concern about the health of population in Pakistan, what has he done other than malign and discredit China's assistance?

He would rather people in Pakistan die than be vaccinated with Chinese vaccine to show his loyalty to western democracy.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Quickie]

I'm not sure if they're focusing on those who haven't got COVID yet.

If they're just vaccinating everyone but not the children, we probably need 200 mil vaccines which would take longer than the chart which seems to assume no overlap.


View attachment 67945


Regardless, the US (and likely EU&Rest of the Americas as well) isn't far from herd immunity due to total neglect of the situation.



China will need 1 billion+ vaccinated though.

They will only vaccinate those people who have previously not been infected with the virus i.e. not tested positive for the virus. That would include those who unknowingly got infected with the virus but recovered from it, meaning they still need that same number of vaccines given how unreliable the antibody test can be.

 

[Gatekeeper]

If it's from Ft. Detrick, then why was the main outbreak not first in the US?

Are you saying the US deliberately put the virus in China to kill people? You realize that's an act of war right? If China believed that then it would go to war with the US. That's a serious charge to bring up against people without proof.

My. You do have selective hearing. I was merely suggesting your assertion that the chances it could be from the Wuhan lab is as high as the chances it could come from fort Detrick.

And if it is from fort Detrick. It could easily be the military personnel that went to Wuhan was ACCIDENTALLY exposed to the virus. But that you somehow turned it around as to say it was deliberate and act of war.

You know something. You remind me of another member here. Are you sure you're not the same person? Lol

 

[NiuBiDaRen]

My. You do have selective hearing. I was merely suggesting your assertion that the chances it could be from the Wuhan lab is as high as the chances it could come from fort Detrick.

And if it is from fort Detrick. It could easily be the military personnel that went to Wuhan was ACCIDENTALLY exposed to the virus. But that you somehow turned it around as to say it was deliberate and act of war.

You know something. You remind me of another member here. Are you sure you're not the same person? Lol

Heard there was a member here with multiple personalities. Maybe it's the same guy? Seems like we have a lot of crackpots here

 

[Gatekeeper]

Sure, if it originated in a US lab, then there's hell to pay for the US government. I just haven't seen anything besides conspiracy theories.

I'm not here to trigger people, either. This investigation is going to be a serious high stakes matter for China and especially Xi Jinping. The CPC needs to bring out more evidence and bigger guns than just screaming Ft. Detrick with no evidence.

Why do you sound like MSM. Every time a major crisis, you guys always put the blame on the guy at the very top in China. Whereas if it happened in the west, it is always blaming the lowest functionary or system failures.

Then you go on to accused CCP and not China. (That is telling of your anti-CCP). of making accusation with no evidence about fort Detrick. Yet doesn't say Jack sxxt about the U.S. doing the same about Wuhan? In fact you are implying with your posts that it's ok to accused Wuhan without evidence.

 

[Gatekeeper]

The Economist might as well publicly declare themselves as a CIA PsycOps programme with how extreme their brown-nosing of America is.

That's right. The economists is sxxt. I think I told you guys the story about my sister still gets me the economist subscription. I haven't got the heart to tell her to stop it.

 

[FangYuan]

Then you go on to accused CCP and not China.

The basic logic of anti-China extremists.

"I don't hate China, I just hate CCP"

If China were still a poor, backward country like the Qing period or some African country, they would love China more, just like rapists love a beautiful girl.

 

[localizer]

Why do you sound like MSM. Everyone a major crisis, you guys always put the blame on the guy at the very top in China. Whereas if it happened in the west, it is always blaming the lowest functionary or system failures.

Then you go on to accused CCP and not China. (That is telling of your anti-CCP). of making accusation with no evidence about fort Detrick. Yet doesn't say Jack sxxt about the U.S. doing the same about Wuhan? In fact you are implying with your posts that it's ok to accused Wuhan without evidence.

The basic logic of anti-China extremists.

"I don't hate China, I just hate CCP"

If China were still a poor, backward country like the Qing period or some African country, they would love China more, just like rapists love a beautiful girl.

I believe Paul Volcker, with regards to China, said it matters not whether a governments policies are tood or bad, but rather how effectively it can implement those policy.

We’re beginning to see that in effect. Why have a government that takes huge tax money and ends up being incompetent in implementation? Right now government in “Democracies” are getting bigger with no benefit to society.

 

[localizer]

https://www.reddit.com/r/Sino/comments/l3xmi5

 

[plawolf]

https://www.reddit.com/r/Sino/comments/l3xmi5

Ah, so that’s why their journey back to Wuhan was so difficult. They went to the wrong province and couldn’t find Wuhan and probably were convinced they were onto a huge scoop where the big bad CCP has ‘disappeared’ a whole city.