Coronavirus 2019-2020 thread (no unsubstantiated rumours!)

[Quickie]

Someone here asked about the difference between inactivated and mRNA vaccines.

In this video, eye-opening questions on how the mRNA and inactivated vaccine work and the former's potential problems from (of all persons like Scientists, doctors, and famous experts) an Australian Senator (at 7:00).

His talking point is basically what we have been discussing in this thread previously, i.e. how the mRNA vaccines would enter the body's bloodstream and end up in different parts of the body, which we were told not to worry too much about. The issue is the production of spike proteins in those cells and how much of them are produced and remains, leading to questions about the body's autoimmune reactions.

Inactivated vaccines on the other hand are rendered in such a way as to lose the ability to enter into cells and in addition, are molecularly too large to enter into veins/capillaries, meaning that the autoimmune system will react to the vaccines only intercellularly at the injection site potentially with much fewer side effects. (My words)

 

[Quickie]

Edited:

.... meaning that the body's immune system will react to the vaccines only intercellularly at the injection site potentially with much fewer side effects.

I mistyped "autoimmune" which is normally associated with the immune system attacking the body's own cells.

 

[In4ser]

More people in the West are starting to express doubts about the Chinese-origin COVID narrative. Video Commenters are even talking about Fort Derrick Origin Conspiracy because they're also finding the timing of the latest news to be very suspicious.

 

[supercat]

More people in the West are starting to express doubts about the Chinese-origin COVID narrative. Video Commenters are even talking about Fort Derrick Origin Conspiracy because they're also finding the timing of the latest news to be very suspicious.

The report was made by the Department of Energy - won't you expect that it's one of the culprits behind the NS blow-up? What WSJ buried deep in their article was the fact that the report was made with "low confidence". Furthermore, the lead author of the WSJ article, Michael R Gordon, was the same one who pushed the narrative of Iraq WMD.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China's Paxlovid analogue is less expensive.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[daifo]

I guess its officially over for Chinese territories

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[SteelBird]

I'd say it short; The new round of origin of Covid-19 is totally political motivated in order to bargain with China about its support to Russia in the war in Ukraine. Period!

 

[Biscuits]

The report was made by the Department of Energy - won't you expect that it's one of the culprits behind the NS blow-up? What WSJ buried deep in their article was the fact that the report was made with "low confidence". Furthermore, the lead author of the WSJ article, Michael R Gordon, was the same one who pushed the narrative of Iraq WMD.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China's Paxlovid analogue is less expensive.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

So Washington finally coming clean about fort detrick?

Personally I don't really believe it, but if it comes from they themselves... Still, none of China's nor other expert epidemiologists have claimed that the virus is man made, so that should rule it out.

I'd say it short; The new round of origin of Covid-19 is totally political motivated in order to bargain with China about its support to Russia in the war in Ukraine. Period!

Even if US comes clean, its not that relevant anymore because the virus endemic. If they really did something deliberately wrong, they would censor it completely. If they didn't do anything wrong and it was just natural, the virus is still endemic and its not that useful to know its origin. Bargaining material that is worth zero doesn't provide anything.

 

[tokenanalyst]

The report was made by the Department of Energy - won't you expect that it's one of the culprits behind the NS blow-up? What WSJ buried deep in their article was the fact that the report was made with "low confidence". Furthermore, the lead author of the WSJ article, Michael R Gordon, was the same one who pushed the narrative of Iraq WMD.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China's Paxlovid analogue is less expensive.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

So this guy is the literal definition of "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me". But US Hawkish politicians have no shame.

 

[Bellum_Romanum]

I guess its officially over for Chinese territories

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

You noticed that western media propagandists are no longer or lessening the use of "DRACONIAN" but it's now chosen to use mandate, strict policy bla blah... Western American propagandists are very sophisticated sophists that you have to literally read every piece of drivel they produce through a magnifying glass coupled with extreme skepticism, otherwise you would have missed the subtle and shadow changes without your conscious knowledge.

 

[KYli]

Winners take all. Pfizer and Moderna is the true winners and Sinopharm and Sinovac are also a bigger winners.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!