Chinese Trainer Aircraft (JL-8, JL-9, JL-10 (L-15), etc.)

tamsen_ikard said:

I dont think they are comparable. Jf-17 is a full fledged fighter with aesa radar, ecm and good air to air capabilities. It also has solid anti shipping and anti radiation missile capabilities. I dont think this trainer will have the advanced radar capabilities. It might be used for light bombing missions but even there it will not be optimized for it.

Click to expand...

But so can be this one. They're in the same class, both supersonic/high performance and so on.
Many LIFTs already go for advanced AESAs and armament sets anyway (Koreans even going towards adding true LACM capability for FA-50 blk.70).
Here it's especially visible - IMHO what we see here is a light fighter in all but name. It may still qualify as qualification trainer for combat pilots, but at this point it's super expensive as a trainer, and can do most combat stuff without major restrictions.

Tomboy said:

IMO if there is enough demand, most if not all of what you said could be integrated with the airframe. Those and the LO features on the aircraft could make it a potent light fighter. Also, it may be in the interest of the PLA to integrate this trainer stock with a low cost AESA to better prepare pilots for transition to a real 5th/6th generation fighter.

Click to expand...

What's the point of adding all these features to the trainer to bring it on par with the JF-17, when one could just acquire the JF-17 itself?

_killuminati_ said:

What's the point of adding all these features to the trainer to bring it on par with the JF-17, when one could just acquire the JF-17 itself?

Click to expand...

It's still fully LIFT capable; 2 in 1, with much longer airframe life;
State of the art national engine, rather than imported RD-93;
It's a 3 decades newer, fresher airframe, without archeotech J-7 trails like in JF-17. It may be outright better at flights envelope;
It's Hongdu, not Chengdu, effectively reinstating them as fighter house. Local ambitions matter.

Wow, this new plane looks like it would be fun to fly. Any idea where these pictures were taken?

Syrida2887 said:

View attachment 163488

Click to expand...

by78 said:

Better versions of previously shared images.

Click to expand...

These two images are taken in very different weather conditions - which could suggest it has already conducted multiple flights?